I just proved your point rediculous, and this is what you come back with? Get addicted myself? Sorry, Im not that weak minded.pnj said:shirley, your wrong about addictions.
get some, then come back and do some talking on the subject....ink:
WTF are you even talking about? I didnt say that coke and an orgasm affected the body differently. Learn to read.Andyman_1970 said:Dude, you have no clue what your talking about. An orgasm and cocaine affect the brain in the exact same way and in the exact same region - your brain does not know the difference.
This part you are correct, but the porn is the vehicle to that orgasm to get one more "hit".
Ok let me rephrase sex and the resulting (hopefully) orgasm can be as addicting as cocaine, and people are "wired" as it were to be inclinded for these kinds of addictions.
wow. you get smarter by the post, dont you? Exactly where did I say that Porn addicts dont exist?pnj said:again, you don't know enough about addictions.....
porn addicts exist.
google it.
No one has proven a damn thing. The statement was made that "Porn is as addictive as Heroin and Alcohol" and that is completely incorrect.Kornphlake said:shirly you're wrong, they've already explained that the probability of addiction to porn is not necessarily as high as the probability of an addiction to cocaine but it is equally difficult to overcome for one who is predisposed to have the addiction. Calling names and using bitting sarcasm won't make you any more right.
there are a number of variables here, and Im sure you know that, but if you give a person a shot of heroin every day for 6 months, they WILL be chemically dependant upon that to some level. The addiction WILL be there. Now some may overcome it more easily than others, but that is not the point. Porn does not work like this. Its not as addictive.pnj said:uh, not everyone that does smack is addicted.
how long does it take to be addicted to a given substance?
You're right if you show 100 guys porn for 10 days straight maybe 80% will have an addiction, if you give a group of 100 guys heroin every day for 10 days straight maybe 95% will have an addiction, I really don't know I'm not going to take the time to search for actual numbers, and frankly I'd be suprised if actual numbers existed as heroin is an illegal drug. I'd expect the addictive properties of heroin to be slightly higer than for porn, but the dependance (which is the word that escaped me in my previous post) for either is the same, as it triggers the same reaction in the brain, rather the trigger is chemical or mental.BurlyShirley said:No one has proven a damn thing. The statement was made that "Porn is as addictive as Heroin and Alcohol" and that is completely incorrect.
Lets say I take 100 guys and give them heroin every day. Then a hundred guys and show them porn every day.
100% of the Heroin guys WILL have a chemical addiction, a much less % will occur with the porn guys, therefor, Porn is not AS addictive. Its that freaking simple.
I dont think your numbers are even REMOTELY close for one, but also, the dependence is not the same. Please explain porn withdrawls to me.Kornphlake said:You're right if you show 100 guys porn for 10 days straight maybe 80% will have an addiction, if you give a group of 100 guys heroin every day for 10 days straight maybe 95% will have an addiction, I really don't know I'm not going to take the time to search for actual numbers, and frankly I'd be suprised if actual numbers existed as heroin is an illegal drug. I'd expect the addictive properties of heroin to be slightly higer than for porn, but the dependance (which is the word that escaped me in my previous post) for either is the same, as it triggers the same reaction in the brain, rather the trigger is chemical or mental.
Im not trying to deny that Porn is addictive at all. What bothers me is the assertion that, since it is, its as equally dangerous as heroin or something which as we all should be able to see, completely rediculous. People dont overdose of porn and die. Its not dangerous. People get addicted to all kinds of things in this world, that doesnt mean its as bad as heroin. Some people get addicted to the computer, should they outlaw those too? Are the mental shortcomings of a few, reason enough to ban something that is by and large harmless to the masses? Is that any reason to paint it as some form of heroin of the soul?TheInedibleHulk said:There is a difference between chemical addiction and psychological addiction, as any good pothead knows. Porn is quite obviously a psychological addiction as is pot, whereas herion and alcohol are chemical addictions. The point that "porn is as addictive as herion" is refering to the fact that some people are born predisposed to addictions, and for these people it may only take one shot or one magazine to start a lifelong addiction. The addictive gene seems to affect both kinds of addiction, which is why alcoholism tends to run in families. I havent seen any info on whether or not porn/sex addiction is hereditary, but certianly it is a topic that has recieved much less study than drug and alcohol addiction (anyone a psych major? here's a good study).
um, this may well be true since there are only a handful (or two handfuls) of neurotransmitters, but it's an empty statement. nerves fire, and release neurotransmitters when they synapse on their target. big deal.Andyman_1970 said:Since and orgasm sets off the same chemical reaction in your brain as cocaine (medical fact) - I would say this is not bogus.
ok, this statement goes a bit farther. please provide a reference. i'm interested in reading about this research.Andyman_1970 said:Dude, you have no clue what your talking about. An orgasm and cocaine affect the brain in the exact same way and in the exact same region - your brain does not know the difference.
now this kind of statement definitely needs a reference, from a peer-reviewed journal. it is outrageous.Kornphlake said:I don't have the exact referances in front of me, but something like 99% of all criminals on death row admit that thier crimes began after becoming addicted to porn.
i think you have the correct "handle" on the situation here.... hehegschuette said:You all are forgetting the basic fact that Porn does not cause the orgasm. Your right or left hand causes the orgasm. So maybe your right hand is degrading for women, ruins childrens lives, and causes an addiction.
Andyman_1970 said:I'm curious, how many "pro-porn" (or even something as tame as frequenting a Hooters) folks out there are also pro womens equality?
I am pro-porn and pro womens equality. I don't see it (as a whole) being degrading to women.Andyman_1970 said:So you have this sense that women are valuable and are worthy of being treated as equals with men, deserving of respect............and yet the way you live, the actions you partake in are in opposition to that (fundamentally)
me - raises handAndyman_1970 said:I'm curious, how many "pro-porn" (or even something as tame as frequenting a Hooters) folks out there are also pro womens equality?
Andyman_1970 said:Actors in a play don't become a that, we don't watch a play and go "man look at that a$$ I bet that feels so good", or "those are some awesome tit$ I would love to..........".
you might be able to drink with out binging, you might smoke once in a while, Just as there is with those things, some people do only think about porn. Sad but trueBurlyShirley said:Well, forgive me if I disagree with CNN, but I do view the occasional porno mag/movie and I havent sold any posessions to buy more. I dont just think about my next hit of porn every waking moment. If I dont see porn for a few months, I dont go through withdrawls and get forced into a methadone clinic or anything. That study or whatever CNN is citing is BOGUS.
why dont you read the rest of the posts I made? That should clear it up for you.scurban said:you might be able to drink with out binging, you might smoke once in a while, Just as there is with those things, some people do only think about porn. Sad but true
Yes, I want your daughter in porn.BurlyShirley said:BUT on the other hand, you have to ask yourself that all-important question:
Would you want your daughter in porn? **** No.
Maybe that means something.
great quote!binary visions said:You know, we've had a lot of fun here tonight. But you know what's not funny?
Killin' strippers.
See, strippers are people too. Naked people, who may be willing to pleasure you for a price you determine later behind the doors of a V.I.P. room.
Besides, there's no need to kill 'em. 'Cause most of 'em are already dead inside.
~The Family Guy