though the welding may not be the prettiest, i've never heard of a weld-related failure. i've got an older tmx, and while the welds lack machine-like precision, they do look structurally sound. the fact that these frames are still out there, running strong after 2-3 years of abuse is a testament to their integrity. i like to think of them as utilitarian/industrial - a burly tool meant to survive years of abuse rather than be hung on the wall of a gallery. i wouldnt worry about the welds - they add character!grimm said:make sure you get an estethically sound weld before you do.. the one brooklyn frame i saw had awful looking welds
like i said, its an estethic matter. i dont think a 3000+ frame should have such bad looking welds.. since what you pay for is the craftmanship and not the material.xy9ine said:though the welding may not be the prettiest, i've never heard of a weld-related failure. i've got an older tmx, and while the welds lack machine-like precision, they do look structurally sound. the fact that these frames are still out there, running strong after 2-3 years of abuse is a testament to their integrity. i like to think of them as utilitarian/industrial - a burly tool meant to survive years of abuse rather than be hung on the wall of a gallery. i wouldnt worry about the welds - they add character!
Well doesn't steel tend to look less pretty than aluminum as far as welds go? I'm somewhat concerned now as I have a FQ coming. I don't care if the welds look kinda crappy. Is this going to affect the structural integrity of the frame? I know nothing about welding.grimm said:like i said, its an estethic matter. i dont think a 3000+ frame should have such bad looking welds.. since what you pay for is the craftmanship and not the material.
i know a thing or two about welding, and i didnt doubt they were strong either when i saw the frame, but if i had done the welding, i wouldve put some pride in my work and do them as nicely as i could. i know that a good welder can do nicer welds than a regular machine too. that said its up to each and everyone to have their own opinions about their looks, but personally i think the "industrial" looking welds on my JFC is much nicer than the bmw had, and they are both hand welded.
personally i want my burly tools to have nice welds too. cant hurt, and as for your bike holding up, thats what its supposed to do
dont worry, the frame will no doubt be structurally sound like mentioned above. im only talking about the LOOKS of the welds here, not the strength.Knuckleslammer said:Well doesn't steel tend to look less pretty than aluminum as far as welds go? I'm somewhat concerned now as I have a FQ coming. I don't care if the welds look kinda crappy. Is this going to affect the structural integrity of the frame? I know nothing about welding.
Knuckle
tmx said:i'd be pretty worried. good grief slammer, get a grip.
ah, so that's where you're coming from.grimm said:personally i only complain about welds that look tacky on a 3000+ frame. I dont care enough about BMW to complain about them specifically. just face it, not everyone loves those overbuilt tanks, no matter how good or excellent they may be.
Hold out as long as you can. it took me along time to build up my bmw and I am glad I waited. Rolling it out that first day made the wait well worth it. Just keep dreamin about rolling your FQ out for the first time for that massive street ride. People are gonna freek out.Knuckleslammer said:so for once in my SAL (sorry ass life) Ima gonna try to exhibit a little patience. I'm dreaming of king hubs, 2005 forks
Knuck
so you consider a 55lbs TMX NOT a tank? face it, most guys who buys these bikes are not after light race bikes.. it IS a tank.. coz its heavy, and will hardly ever break.tmx said:ah, so that's where you're coming from.
no one said all the world must love brooklyn's. sure isn't very nice, nor is it true what you say about them being overbuilt tanks. but it's a free-speaking world, so have at it.
i find it extremely hard to believe you really don't care enough about brooklyn to complain....while spending your valuable time posting several negative comments about the quality of their work.
have a chill pillmacmx said:it is heavy because it's chromoly. Which is stronger. And because it's stronger it is better, especially for DH. It doesn't break.
If you have ever tried a racelink, you will know that it pedals even better than an alu DH bike half it's weight.
By the way, the racelink frame, minus the shock and cranks, weighs only 1 pound more than a normal weight alu DH frame, so there.
And have you ever seen a parkbike? It weighs 6.2 punds which is as much as most lightweight freestyle BMX frames. And it's much bigger. And just as much as most dj alu frames, but stronger. I think that's pretty impressive.
it wasnt a TMX, it was the small thing, FQ i think they are called.Shortbus said:I'd be interested to see the ugly welds on that TMX we're debating about. Before i could jump to conclusions. I personnaly haven't yet noticed a SINGLE flaw in my mini link, being functional or aesthetic, nor did I in the short period of time i owned Joel's TMX. I think their work is huber top notch.
sheesh already, is right! i too was interested in seeing those welds until it became obvious this guy was coming from a very skewed pre-determined view of the company with an out-dated notion of their bikes. he's going to challenge me about the TMX being a tank when my point of expressing displeasure at his "overbuilt tank" comment had nothing to do with that one frame, it had to do with his erroneous accusation that brooklyn's are overbuilt tanks. hell yeah, 55 lbs is alot of weight for a bike, but i still wouldn't call it an overbuilt tank. given the amount of times that bike took a beating so i could be spared leaves me feeling that nothing was wasteful in that design. is the TMX heavy, hell yeah! especially for a scrawny chick such as myself. not my race link though, and certainly not the fq.Shortbus said:so just stay away already sheesh!
I said i'd be interested to see that weld. If its not flawed how can it be ugly? Did it not have a cute ass?
A, it was the best example, apart from the super trucker, that they never focused on light bikes, but bombproofness and function.tmx said:key elements that make his attempt at a valid point mute to this dialogue: A.) the TMX is now five years old and no longer in production. B.) we were originally talking about this mysterious FQ he says he saw so why he'd bring up a five year old frame made for an entirely different purpose than the newer FQ seems misdirected. C.) the TMX wasn't built to be a race bike (even though i raced fairly successfully on mine for three years) so it makes no sense to slam it's weight in regards to a race frame.
You gave us what we want allright.grimm said:Allright, ill give you what you want this once, just becouse you all try so hard to talk bs behind my back, knowing id at least look back to see if thats what you would do. ill give you that much.
now..
Everything breaks. If steel is "better" (in what aspect), why isn't every DH bike made of it?macmx said:it is heavy because it's chromoly. Which is stronger. And because it's stronger it is better, especially for DH. It doesn't break.
Are you comparing it to a normal weight bike that has the shock in it?macmx said:By the way, the racelink frame, minus the shock and cranks, weighs only 1 pound more than a normal weight alu DH frame, so there.
edited.Rik said:Everything breaks. If steel is "better" (in what aspect), why isn't every DH bike made of it?