Well how else are wealthy white people expected to stay in power?? Huh?feature not a bug
Well how else are wealthy white people expected to stay in power?? Huh?feature not a bug
So the orange skinned draft dodger is trying to dis on Walz's service record saying it's stolen Valor, The man served in the National Guard for 24 years. Cheeto got a doc to say he had bad bone spurs to get out of any kind of service. That shit ain't gonna fly
How many trademarks has china fast tracked for Walz's kids?Walz has history with China - it's more hawkish than critics claim
Republicans claim the Democratic VP candidate is a friend of the Chinese government. The reality is very different.www.bbc.com
He seems to take quite a balanced middle road with China.
I can see the CCP funneling cash to the corruption in chief Trump in response.
jackslackofsurpirse.gif
especially coming from a draft dodger.I like the reaching comment by the right, "he retired from the military right before seeing action!"....like, people aren't allowed to retire from jobs.
Well this one was from JDs team, which figures: We need people to work till they die from it, to keep the wealthy comfy.especially coming from a draft dodger.
you think couch fucker does anything without the direction from donnie 2 scoops?Well this one was from JDs team, which figures: We need people to work till they die from it, to keep the wealthy comfy.
The Dems just need to not even address this at this level.I like the reaching comment by the right, "he retired from the military right before seeing action!"....like, people aren't allowed to retire from jobs.
@johnbryanpeters to a white courtesy phone...d2s in his latest word salad "press conference" accused walz of not wanting to have borders.
honestly its a smart strategy. just show everyone how deranged and disconnected he is using his own words.i love that the kamalahq twixter account is just reposting his shit verbatim w/ no context
because vaginas are icky and their most used smartphone app is grindrJust out of curiosity - I'd heard they were lambasting Walz for the feminine products in schools legislation... how in the world is the GOP trying to make a case for this being a *bad* thing? I know... I could do my own research.
because "tampon tim" is fuckin' hilarious, amirite? what a siccc burn!
I mean - I get all that. But do they actually try to make some *cogent* argument that this program is somehow bad?because vaginas are icky and their most used smartphone app is grindr
woo JD was a BadAss...not
Mr Vance served for four years in the US Marine Corps. He was deployed to Iraq for about six months in 2005 as a military journalist, although he didn't experience combat. “I was lucky to escape any real fighting,” he said in his 2016 memoir.8 hours ago
Private Joker.woo JD was a BadAss...not
Mr Vance served for four years in the US Marine Corps. He was deployed to Iraq for about six months in 2005 as a military journalist, although he didn't experience combat. “I was lucky to escape any real fighting,” he said in his 2016 memoir.8 hours ago
The Dems just need to not even address this at this level.
Just answer “how long is your service record? How many combat tours did you see? Fuck right off then.”
ETA: yeah, the dems need to shut this line of attack down hard, bc the “weapons I carried in war” comment treads the bloody edge of embellishment. He was deployed, but not in a combat zone. He may have carried a weapon, but not in the way his comment implied… (fwiw, that is a civlians take on things of which I have no firsthand knowledge…)
My fatherConfused here: Walz claimed to have a silver star, or your dad?
or Kerry?
I *think* it has to something do with how the wording of the law is written. It says that appropriate products should be made available to all menstruating students in school restrooms. It does not specify a gender/sex for the restrooms, it just says “restrooms”. There were some Republicans who pushed back on that language and wanted the wording to specify “female restrooms” but it was never included because fuck you, and the bill passed without the gender specificity language. My understanding is that it even had several Republican votes. I’m sure a google search would turn up sources, but I’m too tired, lazy, and buzzed to look for the article I read this in at the moment.I mean - I get all that. But do they actually try to make some *cogent* argument that this program is somehow bad?