Hey Brother, I Love the Entrance. Perfect.It's the most advanced suspension fork to ever hit the trail
But you get a free Lahar frame with it.2600.00 and no test rides?
Nope, that sounds a bit familiar and a might sketchy.
Not sure if we should trust™ you.
like this?Is what I want(and the Monkeys),is a Proper “DC 4” + Fork”?
Yes Brother,like that,and other Grand Ideas. I have that Fork as I type.like this?
we had these in the shop i was working at bitd. the upper stantion threaded into the lower, so was effectively a convertible DC.
Surfs up, Serf!Fork looks sick. I just think they should just go all in with the marketing of it.
Call the fork:
The Push NFTP
Not for the Poors
"Forks for people who try at life."
If you are gonna get the hate anyway might as well embrace it.
have you considered a career in marketing?latest kashima kissed, root beer anodized, trending wingding
I dont have the patience for the publichave you considered a career in marketing?
What is it that you're able to do with other dampers that you're not able to do with a NINE.ONE damper? I'm surprised that you've already had a NINE.ONE damper apart to examine it.Id rather have a zeb/38 type chassis and then go all out with the damper…as in not-poppet-valve.
but wouldn't the inverted chassis/bushing designs, assuming they did it 'right', make all the difference?Id rather have a zeb/38 type chassis and then go all out with the damper…as in not-poppet-valve.
Damping IME is more important. Lubrication is important though, so a good open bath design solves that. Inverted requires exotic engineering to get a chassis that works at least as well for torsion, and it still leaves you with the negative that if a seal fails during a ride, it hoses your brake. Exotic engineering is exactly what we have here with the crown design…which can work…but costs a lot to work as well as a standard fork. Monies can be better spent in other areas IME.but wouldn't the inverted chassis/bushing designs, assuming they did it 'right', make all the difference?
You were the same guy that claimed up and down the HC97 did not use a POPPET VALVE…and then you went on to exactly describe a POPPET VALVE as the compression valving…if you want to go there?What is it that you're able to do with other dampers that you're not able to do with a NINE.ONE damper? I'm surprised that you've already had a NINE.ONE damper apart to examine it.
1. What is the difference between "exotic engineering" and "engineering"?Damping IME is more important. Lubrication is important though, so a good open bath design solves that. Inverted requires exotic engineering to get a chassis that works at least as well for torsion, and it still leaves you with the negative that if a seal fails during a ride, it hoses your brake. Exotic engineering is exactly what we have here with the crown design…which can work…but costs a lot to work as well as a standard fork. Monies can be better spent in other areas IME.
What does HC97 have to do with the NINE.ONE fork?You were the same guy that claimed up and down the HC97 did not use a POPPET VALVE…and then you went on to exactly describe a POPPET VALVE as the compression valving…if you want to go there?
You seem to love to play the word games, and at this point, I consider it to be purposefully deceitful. The riders on this board are smart enough to figure it out themselves. Ive said before on MTBR that you seem to not want to actually address things, but play further games, and since you are pressing the issue, I’ll bite: I think there is something you intrinsically miss with your supension analysis of forces and speeds and implementation of poppet valves in fork dampers, hence my original comment.1. What is the difference between "exotic engineering" and "engineering"?
2. You mention that "monies can be better spent". What would be an example of that?
What does HC97 have to do with the NINE.ONE fork?
Jm....how can I help? If you have a question just ask.You seem to love to play the word games, and at this point, I consider it to be purposefully deceitful. The riders on this board are smart enough to figure it out themselves. Ive said before on MTBR that you seem to not want to actually address things, but play further games, and since you are pressing the issue, I’ll bite: I think there is something you intrinsically miss with your supension analysis of forces and speeds and implementation of poppet valves in fork dampers, hence my original comment.
You are 100% able to post here, but this isn’t Darren’s thread on the Push inverted fork, this is Ridemonkey’s thread on the same. So we will discuss it and various branching topics…that dont need your approval.
1 exotic engineering is like regular engineering, but with blackjack and hookersJm....how can I help? If you have a question just ask.
Below are some questions that I had regarding your post:
1. What is the difference between "exotic engineering" and "engineering"?
2. You mention that "monies can be better spent". What would be an example of that?
3. What does HC97 have to do with the NINE.ONE fork?
I think JM is just mad at the world that nobody makes a fat tire fork that will still work in race conditions during the alaska zero kelvin temps1 exotic engineering is like regular engineering, but with blackjack and hookers
2 jb weld and duct tape for "Alaska engineering"
3 back in his day, uphill both ways