It would be shorter.stosh said:I'm not sure if my bike had a long or short cage, what would be the disadvantage to ordering a "med" cage if my bike had a long cage?
so I don't f' it up again. Better clearance as a replacement to my toasted one.loco said:It would shift more crisply because the chain is shorter. If you use your big ring much, you could have grief. It should be ok, though. Why do you want medium??
Did you say you tore the other one off? I missed that. I don't know how much different it will be, but you don't want a short cage.stosh said:so I don't f' it up again. Better clearance as a replacement to my toasted one.
narlus said:what is the largest cog you've got on yr cassette? if it's a 32T or 34T, you might not be able to reach it w/ a med cage. give SRAM a ring.
loco said:Did you say you tore the other one off? I missed that. I don't know how much different it will be, but you don't want a short cage.
the big ring has nothing to do w/ the cage length of the der. take a look @ road bikes. big front rings, small cage der. why? because the cassette is smaller range (max gear is about 22T or so typically).loco said:It would shift more crisply because the chain is shorter. If you use your big ring much, you could have grief. It should be ok, though. Why do you want medium??
Ok I'll try to find the time to do that today.narlus said:the big ring has nothing to do w/ the cage length of the der. take a look @ road bikes. big front rings, small cage der. why? because the cassette is smaller range (max gear is about 22T or so typically).
take my advice and ask SRAM what rear cog is the largest a med cage can handle.
Max on a road cassette is smaller than a mountain cassette. The chain length has a lot to do with cage length. If the top pulley is in the same place, explain to me how that affects how many teeth you have in the back? It has to do with total inches, and last time I checked, the big ring adds quite a lot, where the cassette does not.narlus said:the big ring has nothing to do w/ the cage length of the der. take a look @ road bikes. big front rings, small cage der. why? because the cassette is smaller range (max gear is about 22T or so typically).
take my advice and ask SRAM what rear cog is the largest a med cage can handle.
Do you like They Might Be Giants?loco said:Max on a road cassette is smaller than a mountain cassette. The chain length has a lot to do with cage length. If the top pulley is in the same place, explain to me how that affects how many teeth you have in the back? It has to do with total inches, and last time I checked, the big ring adds quite a lot, where the cassette does not.
See Narlus, 2 of us think this. :eviltonguD_D said:<snip>The largest sprocket they can handle usually has plenty of leeway, you can usually get away with a road mech on a 32t cassette and mtb mechs should fit any mtb cassette.
I have never seen them. I've seen Dwight Yoakum a lot.stosh said:I've seen them live more than any other bad.
I've been to about 4 shows of theirs.
I actually managed to piss them off when they released their compilation 2 CD set. They were signing them and they made some comment about me rushing to get the CD's signed and I said yeah I need to get it home and on EBAY and they were f'ing pissed.
I of course would never have put it on ebay... but they didn't find the humor in it.
TMBG's are from NYC so I have a lot of chances to see them. How long have you been listening to them?loco said:I have never seen them. I've seen Dwight Yoakum a lot.
87 for sure. Maybe 86.stosh said:TMBG's are from NYC so I have a lot of chances to see them. How long have you been listening to them?
Yikes, ya got me beat by about 4yrs.loco said:87 for sure. Maybe 86.
so then explain SRAM's criteria which stosh posted.loco said:See Narlus, 2 of us think this. :eviltongu
Having taken the X0/X9 off of my bike, I will continue to think SRAM doesn't know what they are doing. I wouldn't take their word for it.narlus said:so then explain SRAM's criteria which stosh posted.
bwahhhhhhhhhhloco said:Having taken the X0/X9 off of my bike, I will continue to think SRAM doesn't know what they are doing. I wouldn't take their word for it.
*edit - they likely think most people are too stupid to get the chain right.
I think that must be it as well. (besides the cog limitations of the derailleurs)firetoole said:it mostly depends on the hanger angle and the size casset you are sporting
So by your logic I should be able to run a short cage derailleur since I'm running 11-32 and 22-32-bash? Is that true? If so cool! I know what I'm running next.zahgurim said:Ok, since you are running a 22-32-44 front, you have to be very, very carefull with your shifting if you're running a shortcage. That's if you can get it to work properly in the first place at all.
Ok cool because I just purchased the Med cage.zahgurim said:Ok, since you are running a 22-32-44 front, you have to be very, very carefull with your shifting if you're running a shortcage. That's if you can get it to work properly in the first place at all.
A shorty will only take so much slack from your chain, and since you are running 3 rings in the front you will have a lot of slack to take up.
I run a shortcage Dura-ace mech on 2 of my mtbs, one is an 11-32, one an 11-34. Both work awesome, but only because I run a single ring in the front. Going through the 9 cogs in the rear is not too much slack to handle...
You will have to set yours up while in the front middle ring, and be carefull with your shifting while in the top and bottom front rings, so that you don't have either too much slack in your chain, or to much, depending on the gear.
I definately reccomend going with at least a medium cage for your bike, since you are running the three front rings.
We're barely to the 2nd page.the Inbred said:a quick question turned into 3 pages....neato
You must be cooler than Dustin and I.Wumpus said:We're barely to the 2nd page.
You are cooler on pages, but you still don't know crap about cage lengths and tooth counts.narlus said:i'm on page one, you dolts.
narlus said:i'm on page one, you dolts.