Thanks for that and thx for everyone for their posts which are excellent and constructive. Well it seems that this is snowballing - I hope we have more than a snowball's chance in hell of producing results. Since I have no winter sports I can put some time into this. We seem to have an emerging consensus, but we gravity riders should put some thought into the questions below for discussion at the StS yahoogroup and at our meeting.onetime said:So, the group is savetheshed@yahoogroups.com. We can all hash out our thoughts there. My one comment on the recent threads about MORE is that they are here to represent us. They are not the ones who actually veto any plans, that is done by those in control of the area in question. As for getting approved for "stunts", or rather the usual lack thereof, I think our first priority should be trails in general. We should look into some steeper sections with already existing features. But i'm getting ahead of myself, like I said we can all talk about it on the group site and at the meeting.
I'll write the short proposal in January after our meeting and of course circulate for comments. We should clarify three things:
1. We as gravity riders should rank what our own priorities are (MORE is already well-placed to represent the overall interests of general MTBing):
a. save current XC trails? (btw I don't think MTB access is threatened)
b. build new legal gravity/advanced trails? (my personal priority)
c. legitimize existing pirate trails?
d. importance of FR structures to us?
e. help maintain current trails?
f. participate more in NBR activities like clean-ups?
g. buy more guns?
2. We also should determine how to organize:
a. as an organized group?
b. as an ad-hoc collection of riders?
c. a loose affiliation of gravity goons?
d. divide labor (builders, policy people, organizers, etc.)
3. Determine our strategy (how to achieve our priorities):
a. help shape the emerging Shed recreational plan to incorporate gravity riding as a legitimate form of recreation.
b. just be hand maidens to maintaining existing XC trails (this won't sustain my interest personally).
Item #3 needs some more background info on the Shed's budgets, timelines, and proposed recreation mgt plan, and so on, but it's a start.
Hillary and I (and others) will be meeting with people who have been active in this stuff for a while, including Philip Werk, the Fred Shed MTB liaison and MORE member. This will give us the background info needed to explain how the Shed is managed, what the range of possibilities are, and so on. MORE people have been very positive about freeride. I've joined MORE myself and put my money where my mouth is.
Btw, this is the kind of work that I do (land mgt strategic planning for multilateral agencies overseas), plus I wrote my master's thesis for env'l policy on trail mgt and bike/boot/hoof conflict back in the early days. So I think I can really help the DH scene focus itself and put forth a good proposal that represents gravity's interests while maintaining the water catchment function of the watershed.
Lastly, for suspicious lurkers who might be reading: I don't know of a single big bike rider in the Shed who doesn't also ride XC or hike. Most also do other outdoor stuff like fish, hunt, camp, and so on.
One request: please read the IMBA freeride trail building guide and the Gorge FR Assoc website. Tons of great ideas in them that will help us legitimize our sport.