it feels very canadianWhat is it?
I love rowdy hardtails, but I can't understand wanting 8" of travel on one.
2000's Bromont feel...... .243 hardtails with monstahsit feels very canadian
Especially with a headtube that short.What is it?
I love rowdy hardtails, but I can't understand wanting 8" of travel on one.
Homeboy just shredded this thing to a 3rd place finish at wind rock in a stacked pro class. Big ups. She ain’t the prettiest pony but he proved it works.View attachment 144557
is the world ready for 490mm chainstays?
Bike Check: Isak Leivsson's Homemade Steel Downhill Bike - Pinkbike
The Norwegian rider returns with a hand-built bike with geometry numbers based on Sam Hill's golden era.www.pinkbike.com
bonus points: 10mm stem
santa cruz also have a carbon rear end for the mixed size v10, so a release for one is likelymullet Demo is official.
yea, i can't remember the timeline, but there is a UCI rule that requires any bike/component that is raced in a WC has to be saleable to the public within a certain timeframe of when it is first raced.santa cruz also have a carbon rear end for the mixed size v10, so a release for one is likely
might have been poor sobriety but remi thirion and someone else i think is running a mix as well from instagram riding clips on vital. maybe commencal will have an option in the future.
New stuff - https://www.pinkbike.com/news/sram-new-gx-drivetrain-first-look-2020.html
Look at that jump to the last cog... the 50 tooth on my bike is already low enough that I only use it on steep or long gravel road type stuff. I've walked beside people riding in their 50 tooth and could probably have gone faster. Whats the point of 52 teeth? Maybe I posted in the wrong thread...
Some of us ride places like thisNew stuff - https://www.pinkbike.com/news/sram-new-gx-drivetrain-first-look-2020.html
Look at that jump to the last cog... the 50 tooth on my bike is already low enough that I only use it on steep or long gravel road type stuff. I've walked beside people riding in their 50 tooth and could probably have gone faster. Whats the point of 52 teeth? Maybe I posted in the wrong thread...
That makes no sense. Running a smaller chainring on a 29er than you would on a bike with smaller wheels? Sure. But you don't need a wider range on a 29er, you just need to adjust where that range falls to compensate for the wheel size.Not to be Captain Obvious, but 50-52 teeth cassettes are essentially 29-er specific.
Not needed for 27 (or 26 ofc).
Shimano XT offers 2 cassettes: one for 27, one for 29. E13 does too.
(I have no interest in SRAM drivetrains.)
Yeah I get that. I guess my question is, at what point does gearing get so low that you might as well just start hiking, as you'll move faster?
Look, we're talking the bike industry. Logic and reason have no place here.That makes no sense. Running a smaller chainring on a 29er than you would on a bike with smaller wheels? Sure. But you don't need a wider range on a 29er, you just need to adjust where that range falls to compensate for the wheel size.
my granny combo is 32x47 ... after that I'm walkin' .Yeah I get that. I guess my question is, at what point does gearing get so low that you might as well just start hiking, as you'll move faster?
Yeah I get that. I guess my question is, at what point does gearing get so low that you might as well just start hiking, as you'll move faster?
Spinning a low gear is less prone to push me into cramping stage than hiking when I'm worn out.Yeah I get that. I guess my question is, at what point does gearing get so low that you might as well just start hiking, as you'll move faster?
That makes no sense. Running a smaller chainring on a 29er than you would on a bike with smaller wheels? Sure. But you don't need a wider range on a 29er, you just need to adjust where that range falls to compensate for the wheel size.
Back when cars had smaller wheels we only needed 3 and 4 speed transmissionsI agree it's a bit silly, but it's pretty clear from the cassette offerings that the ultra low 52 is for 29 and the ~46T option is for 27, in my opinion.
But, spinning a 30T front-52T rear on a 27 is crazy low. And I am a weakling winch and plummet rider who climbs and sometimes pushes up steep shit.
Wider range is needed for climbing without a front derailleur.
because shimano has a 51 tooth cassette, duhWhats the point of 52 teeth?
this was my exact first thought.because shimano has a 51 tooth cassette, duh
Because riding is always better than walking.Yeah I get that. I guess my question is, at what point does gearing get so low that you might as well just start hiking, as you'll move faster?
I am still running an 11spd road cassette, 11-36 is fine for my local lack of hills.my granny combo is 32x47 ... after that I'm walkin' .
but with the exception of axs, what other major innovations has sram put out on their drivetrains since they launched eagle? say what you will about shimano's stumbles (which they have had) but when they put out 12 speed they actually put out some features that weren't just more range. the ability to actually shift under load is a big one (and by all accounts i've read actually works), plus their double downshit feature (albeit carried over from 11 speed) is a standout feature over sram as well. to be fair here, you can do more than 1 downshift on sram, but only with axs.We can argue about who needs what and what gear range makes you a manly man or not, but the new derailleur and current axs are backwards and forward compatible. That’s pretty good as far as the bike industry goes. It is also a swipe at Shimano doing 51, it’s an incremental gain for sure but in the last few years Shimano seems to be good at making things incompatible with its self in the same generation, scraping previous “standard” and also not having new stuff in stock even remotely close to its announcement.
bullshit, just look at the new sram force WIDE. incompatible with the force released last yearWe can argue about who needs what and what gear range makes you a manly man or not, but the new derailleur and current axs are backwards and forward compatible. That’s pretty good as far as the bike industry goes. It is also a swipe at Shimano doing 51, it’s an incremental gain for sure but in the last few years Shimano seems to be good at making things incompatible with its self in the same generation, scraping previous “standards” and also not having new stuff in stock even remotely close to its announcement.
personally climb with a 30/42 setup all over here. But I am eager to swap my drivetrain to 12speed with a big 51T cassette once I retire the current drivetrain in a few hundred miles.Yeah I get that. I guess my question is, at what point does gearing get so low that you might as well just start hiking, as you'll move faster?