Keep an eye on it. My Thomson X4 made 7 years on the trail bike and then cracked.i have a stem that's been going for maybe a decade...before droppers their old posts were light/strong too.
Keep an eye on it. My Thomson X4 made 7 years on the trail bike and then cracked.i have a stem that's been going for maybe a decade...before droppers their old posts were light/strong too.
yea, i shard this with hab, and he commented on the dated geometry. my response was that its perfect for the kind of person that would actually consider a ti hardtail from thomson.I like Thomson but I fear they haven’t kept up with the times. They are popular with the Paul’s Components / bike jewelry set. Hence the made in Taiwan ti hardtail.
CANCEL CULTURE UGHit would appear the mullet cycles press release shit show over on vital got nuked
i suspect the company themselves pulled it, after they started getting asked for their patent numbers and an explanation as to why none of their alleged trademarks showed up in a TM searchCANCEL CULTURE UGH
That's what I figured, but the same company that suggested "Make biking great again" as a slogan will probably be the first to blame others...i suspect the company themselves pulled it, after they started getting asked for their patent numbers and an explanation as to why none of their alleged trademarks showed up in a TM search
who rides DH bikes anymore?DH bikes.
have you seen their awesome MS paint diagrams?That's what I figured, but the same company that suggested "Make biking great again" as a slogan will probably be the first to blame others...
i'm getting my DH bike freshed up for the summer.who rides DH bikes anymore?
but seriously...there was a time we all tried to trick out our DH bikes with the best of everything, but my guess is that most people are quite content with the stock seatpost or upgrade straight to carbon.
I'm not going to try to wrap my head around the first one, but in the second wouldn't that be a good thing? Don't you want a "better" "angle of attack" as they say? And the third one....lawdy.
I still have mine...and it's still 26". I even rode it last year.i'm getting my DH bike freshed up for the summer.
making a pictogram with arrows doesn't mean its compliant with the laws of physicsI'm not going to try to wrap my head around the first one, but in the second wouldn't that be a good thing? Don't you want a "better" "angle of attack" as they say? And the third one....lawdy.
I still have mine...and it's still 26". I even rode it last year.
My professional assessment as an engineer is: hogwash.making a pictogram with arrows doesn't mean its compliant with the laws of physics
update: confirmed it was pulled by the company.i suspect the company themselves pulled it, after they started getting asked for their patent numbers and an explanation as to why none of their alleged trademarks showed up in a TM search
Beats "acoustic bike" by an ample margin.
Minus the single pivot part..Trek is working on an HSP session with an idler.
It's still their abp design, so it could be argued that it's a linkage driven single pivot.Minus the single pivot part..
It actually loses the Full floater thingy, where the shock is bolted to the rear triangle alone, but not the ABP.Minus the single pivot part..
Hello new signatureWHAT'S A FREE BODY DIAGRAM ANYWAY. According to Newton's 420th law, "F = whatever I want."
it just reeked of the late 90's / early 00's mentality "our stuff is the best you can't even question it". they should call themselves bong resin bikes, because they've probably been encased in that stuff since back then.Everything on that page honestly made me pretty angry. It's like the cocky dumbshit in your high school physics class yelling over top of the teacher. EVERYONE ELSE IN THE BIKE INDUSTRY IS A MORON AND I'M THE ONLY ONE SMART ENOUGH TO WORK EVERYTHING OUT, SO IT'S A SECRET IN CASE YOU STEAL MY IDEAS. Like anyone was rushing out to copy your grossly falling rate rear end.
"Axle force path"... ok mate. Not sure where to even begin describing that except to say "not a thing". The front wheel does not care where the rear axle is when you're hitting a bump hard enough for OTB excursions to be a concern.
"Scrub radius"... a radius is a straight line for starters, and this is not a scrub radius at all, because the term scrub radius refers to suspension self-steer behaviour when the linkage moves in a plane that is perpendicular to the direction of travel AND has a steering element (in other words, car front suspension...). Absolute gibberish. Maybe they were trying to reference an actual contact patch path when cornering, which would have been almost as good because that still isn't significantly affected by rear wheel size on dirt anyway due to the very high slip angles.
"Force vector"... random arrows attached to nothing. WHAT'S A FREE BODY DIAGRAM ANYWAY. According to Newton's 420th law, "F = whatever I want."
They would have had a better time selling homeopathic bikes. As long as you believe you've got a bike...
i am going to use this term in the future whenever garbage physics is encountered.Newton's 420th law
I don't think a pivot placement for a single pivot frame could be patented. There's no way to protect/trademark a mathematical formula showing you've found the perfect/magical/unicorn jizzed location with relation to any other frame dimensions.@Steve M i also did a quick patent search, i couldn't even find a patent number on their website, which leads me to assume:
i also did a quick TM search, which is generally quicker and easier to return results, and nothing turned up.
- Its not their patent, they're just licensing it; or it was someone else's patent they acquired. Nothing wrong with licensing something, but not stating that is more than a little disingenuous.
- The patent doesn't cover what they say it does; they talked about pivot placement and such, but then also mentioned bearing combinations? Misleading.
- The patent is so poorly worded it wouldn't be able to withstand legal scrutiny if it were challenged - and that's assuming the have the ability (read: "funding") to defend such a challenge. Given all the other nonsense they've posted (combined with the fact that they're bragging about a bike with a regressive rate) leads me to assume this is the most likely scenario.
- There is no patent. This is likely false advertising (which is illegal)
i believe there are some patents where pivot placement was an element of the claims, however it was to support other claims for certain kinematics. not the location by itself.I don't think a pivot placement for a single pivot frame could be patented. There's no way to protect/trademark a mathematical formula showing you've found the perfect/magical/unicorn jizzed location with relation to any other frame dimensions.
“Miles is a mover & a shaker when it comes to ‘always be sellin’.”
@Steve M i also did a quick patent search, i couldn't even find a patent number on their website, which leads me to assume:
i also did a quick TM search, which is generally quicker and easier to return results, and nothing turned up.
- Its not their patent, they're just licensing it; or it was someone else's patent they acquired. Nothing wrong with licensing something, but not stating that is more than a little disingenuous.
- The patent doesn't cover what they say it does; they talked about pivot placement and such, but then also mentioned bearing combinations? Misleading.
- The patent is so poorly worded it wouldn't be able to withstand legal scrutiny if it were challenged - and that's assuming the have the ability (read: "funding") to defend such a challenge. Given all the other nonsense they've posted (combined with the fact that they're bragging about a bike with a regressive rate) leads me to assume this is the most likely scenario.
- There is no patent. This is likely false advertising (which is illegal)
Have these on my bikes... will keep an eye. Is that the 4mm kind or the 3mm kind? Have one of each iirc.Keep an eye on it. My Thomson X4 made 7 years on the trail bike and then cracked.
View attachment 157462
That's probably because you were trying to use it with a 35mm bullhorn handlebar on your penny farthing .I have an x4 as well and it's one of two stems that have ever twisted on me. Hard to get good torque on the 1.5mm stem bolts they use. Now I wrench the fuck out of them every time and will replace the stem when I can.
It was the 4mm kind. Ran it on my DJ (probably what killed it) and then trail bike where it finally died one ride. It actually made it back to the carpark (gently) with just the one clamp but yeah I guess everything aluminium and weight optimised will eventually fatigue and die.Have these on my bikes... will keep an eye. Is that the 4mm kind or the 3mm kind? Have one of each iirc.