That is some very specific ad-targeting. I, for one, welcome our new algorithmic overlords.^^ Maybe, if it wasn't for the grammatical train-wreck. Or is this some sort of $tinkle specific, esoteric jab at Syadasti's ruling on ironic ?
We'll make a liberal out of you yet.so the real villain here is fat white people?
i can dig that.
i'm already an asshole with questionable morals, so i guess i'm partway th.......oh.......i seeWe'll make a liberal out of you yet.
I think you should say situational ethics rather than questionable morals...kinda like the difference between being 'floosy outdoorsy' and a gay Canadian.i'm already an asshole with questionable morals, so i guess i'm partway th.......oh.......i see
Or perhaps the MoC is an especially gifted bloviator.when a MoC dresses you down for deception, it might be time for some navel gazing
ftfy...when eddie munster dresses you down for deception, it might be time for some navel gazing
Not de-bunked so much as it has been Faux Noos-icized into deny, deny, deny give them more guns because these all werent Sandy Hook style shootings. At its heart, it is simply a list of sickening, chained events that need to be stopped. Isnt that enough?i think that has been debunked.....
Exactly. After I pointed that out it devolved into some lame BS about "it's still a waste of money". I declined to engage. Can't argue with stupid people, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.There are 3 kinds of people in this world, those who are good at math, and those who aren't.
Saw this on FB today. Pretty sure I appreciated it for a completely different reason than the guy who posted it.
You should have said that you got your Obama Check for $1, and since maybe his got lost in the mail you'll give him yours?Exactly. After I pointed that out it devolved into some lame BS about "it's still a waste of money". I declined to engage. Can't argue with stupid people, they bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.