No comment needed.
Rick Perry from tonight's debate...
- Thread starter dante
- Start date
dur dur dur.... hey ron, what's that thing you were talkin' bout cuttin'?
:facepalm: is apropos
cocaine's a helluva drug
Bush would be proud
Lolololololol
" I would do away with education..."
I honestly don't know which is worse, that he couldn't remember which agencies he *desperately* wants to cut, or that the *only* one that he could remember without being prompted was education...
Regulating interstate commerce is a constitutionally mandated function of the federal government. fuuuuuuuck, Some Republicans are so damn stupid.
Most Republicans are now thinking "He don't know **** about gubment. Just like me! Got my vote. Wouldn't want no faggy intuhlectjool running this cunt-tree."
Anti-intellectual Jedi master.
It's Texas, it fosters a certain kind of stupidity. Just listen to HK's inane ramblings is further proof of that.
alinwink:
Shlt........ Bush was that dumb and still got 'elected'(sic)
Perry wishes he was that awesome*
*rich enough to afford karl rove
He seems to have started with his own.......
I couldn't get past 46 seconds. Jesus ****. While we can all breathe a sigh of relief that he won't be president, let's not forget he's already a ****ing governor! I wouldn't leave this dip**** in charge of defrosting hamburger, and he's in charge of the second largest economy in the nation.
The intellectual part of me thinks that his campaign is over... however, there are certain people in the Republican party who are willing to overlook certain types of stupidity.
Oh, and the other (less reported?) gaffe of the night was the guy who's under fire for sexual harassment and mistreatment of women calling the ex-Speaker of the House "Princess Nancy".
Overall it was actually a pretty good debate, the moderates weren't taking any sh!t from the candidates, and when one didn't answer the question, they asked it again more pointedly. A little more like an interview and less like a Fox News anchor lobbing softball questions.
Overall it was actually a pretty good debate, the moderates weren't taking any sh!t from the candidates, and when one didn't answer the question, they asked it again more pointedly. A little more like an interview and less like a Fox News anchor lobbing softball questions.
I refuse to believe that was real. A presidential candidate can't possibly be that stupid.
Oh, by the way, this also came out as well....
Newt's $300k lobbying for Freddie Mac deemed a "history lesson".
Newt's $300k lobbying for Freddie Mac deemed a "history lesson".
Last edited:
Not even President Commacho?
that was my point. Bush had plenty of stupid interviews/speeches even when he was prez.
I really feel like I could sit down and have an oxycontin with perry.
just one?
Commacho = smarter than Rick Perry
If I had to sit down with Rick Perry I would need the whole bottle.
Once you pop you just cant stop!
He resembles Arnold the governator, but arnold is much smarter.
That was both painful and dis heartening.
That was both painful and dis heartening.
This isn't going to effect his chances of winning the nomination at all. He represents all that is sacred to the GOP, racist, pro-life, pro death penalty, anti-education and bringing the bible into government. He's a tough acting dip sh!t that can be easily manipulated just like Shrub.
The look on Ron Paul's face is classic, "Wow, and just when I thought things couldn't get any easier for me..."
I have to admit, of that entire entourage, Ron Paul is able to at least convey his completely fvcking retarded ideas in a very coherent fashion. I mean he even has answers when people ask questions about his own ideas.
since when did we start believing anything white women say when oppressing a brother?
cain might have my vote with this video
Herman Cain
Herman Cain
I haven't been paying attention, but that was the feeling I got.
Ron Paul is the truth! I don't believe Newt Gingrich will self-implode like the rest of the front runners have so far, so I believe Ron Paul will have a difficult time defeating Newt, but I would really like to see a debate between Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich and Obama. For all that Obama lacks in presidential skills, he is a good debater and would put the rest of the GOP candidates to shame.
Gingrich has already imploded. He just may get a second chance because of the ineptness of the rest of the field. Huntsman is the only one that stands a chance against Obama. Fortunately, he is not bombastic enough to make it past the frothers.
"Truth" means dumbfvck flat taxer who thinks the government should be out of your life unless it involves a fertilized cell, and that Hammurabi currency should be legal tender right?
Last edited:
I just figured he was Bush Jr... Sucking of his daddies tit and with a coke problem.
You got it... somewhat.
Government policies are good when the country has a lot of money to go around and they support you, but generally they don't unless you're part of the 1% and buddies with the elected official and can convince him to invest in your market. Home prices, college tuition, healthcare, they're all artificially inflated bubbles thanks to the government giving out easy money to buy into the system. Healthcare is more complex, but it has way too much regulation.
So while I don't necessarily disagree with the moves that the government makes, I like the technology that Solyndra represents, I don't think we are in a position to be flagrantly tossing tax-payer money at businesses that lack the drive to earn it in the real market. It's time to stop stripping tax-payers of their income only to be redistributed into the bank accounts of ceo's that are friends of the government.
But mostly I like Ron Paul because he's the only candidate that will stand up to the military industrial complex. When Ron Paul says that he's bringing the troops out of Iraq, he means back to America, not to some military flotilla in the Persian Gulf like Obama is.
Last edited: