i, for one, do not welcome our robot-lizard overlords.It's easy for the bike to "tell" if it's climbing. . . That's how it knows you're climbing
i, for one, do not welcome our robot-lizard overlords.It's easy for the bike to "tell" if it's climbing. . . That's how it knows you're climbing
Eh?In terms of the force on the wheel, pushing the bike forward through the chainstay, this is much greater on a climb than can possibly be accelerating on level (or DH).
That's how it knows you're climbing
You mean something with 6 bars?This thread actually needs Dave Weagle to explain why he never chose to design anything remotely like this.
I was going to pull the plug on this shitshow, but decided that I would let it live.
For anybody searching for some Tantrum information, this will be an eye opener - if they don't commit suicide first.
One of those bars was sold along time ago.You mean something with 6 bars?
I agreeNo. it's entirely consciously... Yes. it's natural. and controlled by muscle memory and instinct more than thinking hard about it. Subconscious implies something you do without focus and are not aware of at the time.
I'm with you. But for anyone searching for info, they won't click on this, thankfully (for changing the title). You have to wade thru 20 pages of insults to get to 4 pages of discussion. Sad. This is more for the people that want to keep the hate alive, in between a few legit questions.I was going to pull the plug on this shitshow, but decided that I would let it live.
For anybody searching for some Tantrum information, this will be an eye opener - if they don't commit suicide first.
Would you agree that it takes more force to push a weight up a hill than on level ground? At the same speed?Eh?
I generate far more watts sprinting than I ever do climbing.. at what force in Watts does it decide I'm climbing?
and if what I think I've understood you're trying to say.. how does the gradient affect that force?
With additional commentary from Aaron the Lahar guy.This thread actually needs Dave Weagle to explain why he never chose to design anything remotely like this.
You do realize not all of your frames have to fail? There are incosistencies in welding. Also it's not a success when you sell 100-200 frames right away and then ruin your business for years. Sunn bicycles did that. Do you see them now?If I underestimate my sales numbers, I think that means I'm having a good year.
But let's follow your logic. 4 weeks after delivery, cracks start to appear due to a mfg defect. That means that whatever frames that are available will have already been made, maybe on the boat, when we realize this problem. The last thing I want to do is replace defective frames with some that have the exact same problem.
Yes, that means they would have to wait. But to me, that's better than giving somebody a replacement that I know will fail. I just can't see any point in that. No matter what another batch will have to be made. Why not the new gen that's already in the works?
With my previous model bike, they were usually completely sold out by May/June, except for maybe an XXL or extra small or 2. I had to have one of my personal frames warrantied after a couple years due to corrosion. There were none, so I got a frame that was 2 years newer. Worked for me.
Dude. I asked if the graphs provided are wrong can you give us an approximation. Did you give it to us? Nope. I asked where they are wrong and you didn't respond. So outside of responding with "OMGWTFBBQ you are wrong, my hands are big, I have the best experts" you did give us no info about the bike outside of the fact that you are putting more pressure on uphill capabilities of the bike than most producers and care less about downhill performance than most (when most want a decently pedaling bike that is great on the downhills, you want a great pedaling bike that is decent on the downhills and expect the shock to work double time)You might want to reconsider those statements in light of the actual thread. I came in a few pages in, when an extremely poor analysis was presented, which had no bearing on the actual suspension. It had LR's that were fully 30% off the charts, AS numbers that bore no meaning to the real bike. Claims of evil, unrideable traits that these numbers most produce.
No. I did not and will not provide dimensional info to satisfy you. I DID tell everyone that the numbers presented were severely inaccurate and did not reflect the bike. I told them that most of the LR curve was off the charts, I even mentioned which parts of the curve. I mentioned hard numbers, that my LR never exceeded 3.0 :1. I told them that the starting LR used was also beyond reality.
If I was really trying to find out what the suspension did and the designer give me the above clues (listening to learn), I would go back to my analysis and adjust it and see if it made more sense. Instead, I am told that MY numbers are wrong, and Hmcleay comes up some conclusions that are NOT EVEN POSSIBLE!!!! When I question him and these very direct, very obvious contradictions in his conclusion, he clams up.
Just like any of you, when asked a serious question by me. Or you just resort to name calling, funny memes and avoidance of the topic.
I did give you data. You just didn't want to use it. Didn't want to believe it. Didn't want to discuss it. It's easier to spew hatred than have a discussion where you already claimed and flamed you knew it all and might have to back up a bit.
I think i may know how to contact Jan Karpiel. Can I send him the link to this topic?With additional commentary from Aaron the Lahar guy.
Sure i did. Multiple times. I believe your graph started around 1.6 to 1 and continued dropping all the way thru the stroke till about 3.3 ish.Dude. I asked if the graphs provided are wrong can you give us an approximation. Did you give it to us? Nope. I asked where they are wrong and you didn't respond. So outside of responding with "OMGWTFBBQ you are wrong, my hands are big, I have the best experts" you did give us no info about the bike outside of the fact that you are putting more pressure on uphill capabilities of the bike than most producers and care less about downhill performance than most (when most want a decently pedaling bike that is great on the downhills, you want a great pedaling bike that is decent on the downhills and expect the shock to work double time)
AView attachment 124305 s fare as I know this is just a six bar, that's been around for years. Felt has been selling it for long time for instance the Compulsion 10. I don't see much difference.
Felt is still making bikes?AView attachment 124305 s fare as I know this is just a six bar, that's been around for years. Felt has been selling it for long time for instance the Compulsion 10. I don't see much difference.
"What matters is the ride."Sure i did. Multiple times. I believe your graph started around 1.6 to 1 and continued dropping all the way thru the stroke till about 3.3 ish.
I said the top of the graph is wrong, by about 15%. The bottom never goes over 3:1. It falls pretty quickly from topout to sag, more gently from sag to 50% and flattens out after that.
I told you exactly why I want this rate. to encourage the suspension to move deeper into its travel and respond better to impacts. To a point.
I told you that I prefer a low volume, hi rising rate spring as opposed to progressive linkage for the bottom of the stroke.
I have made the above points repeatedly throughout this thread.
And to this date, nobody has bothered to address the gross inconsistencies and contradictions in the analysis done. The conclusions by your own "experts" do not even agree with themselves. Nobody cares to talk about it.
Would you care to now?
how many used x-box games do i have to trade in?Funny that it managed to devolve into a shit show on two different forums. There might be a PB thread too, but it probably got buried under "what DH should my mom buy me?" threads.
i can get you some of my sisters used pantiesPlus a bad azz paintball marker.
Norbar,You do realize not all of your frames have to fail? There are incosistencies in welding. Also it's not a success when you sell 100-200 frames right away and then ruin your business for years. Sunn bicycles did that. Do you see them now?
It's not that funny. The same 2 experts posted the contested analysis. For some reason, on the "other" forum, the shistorm has vanished and the thread is now a logical discussion with a lot of demo reviews to compare. Not sure why anyone would not want to post a positive comment here.......Funny that it managed to devolve into a shit show on two different forums. There might be a PB thread too, but it probably got buried under "what DH should my mom buy me?" threads.
Really? I didn't know any of our Prime Ministers were into mountain bikes. Which one? Harper? Martin? Or are we going way back to The Little Guy from Shawinigan? Chrétien would bust you in the chops if you got in his way.When I was working with another bike company years ago, the whistler rental fleet developed an issue of cracking under the HT weld to the DT. I spent the night with the PM dye checking all the frames and sending the serial numbers to the factory.
Who the hell are you and how did you find this place?This thread is gold... the snarks and professional interneters are quite entertaining.
Forget about the weird marketing, leverage curves, your internet manhood measurements... Ride it, then talk sh!t.
No no shit?Who the hell are you and how did you find this place?
You can say shit here.
If so, that would be a very shitty situation.Are you shitting me?
Need a 180 degree phase shit.Up shit creek with the wrong suspension kinematics even.......
I'm Chuck Biscuits, and there's a link to this shit fling on another banner hawker.Who the hell are you and how did you find this place?
You can say shit here.