Quantcast

RIP The Industry™

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,403
22,484
Sleazattle
Probably, yeah, sure. So what was your point? Every trail I've ridden was found AND built, at least to some extent. I don't think it was your intent, but saying they can just be found fully baked and ready to go seems to discredit that work.

I am saying that good trails are the ones where the builders take the time to route the trails to maximize the use of available natural features select challenging lines, give riders options etc. Shitty trails are the ones where people randomly pick a route on a map, bust out mini-dozers and copy and paste the same doubles and berms that can be found anywhere like it was a franchised boomer restaurant. I am not discrediting the effort of trailbuilders but noting the most important work goes into the picking the route, not the "building" that comes afterwords.
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,567
8,483
SADL
meh, not sure I fully agree. trails evolve. it's natural. people have different visions, styles, and preferences etc... I hate bermkake and flow trails as much as the next monkey. Out here, we had the land manager rebuild an old natural trail. bermkaked the fuck out of it. any attempt to cut out the switchbacks and ride the old line are promptly filled in with debris and branches by the retired people who have the time to go in and "fix" the trails. drives me nuts. your berms and switchbacks kill the flow. IMnsHO, if a new line gets ridden in, then there's probably a good reason for it. To be clear, I'm not talking about one-off strava lines, but fully burned in lines here.

I can't remember if it was on Pinkbike or on NSMB a few years ago where a trail builder talked about that process of "gifting their trail to the world, but needing to accept that it might evolve and change from his personal vision of it"... I'll see if I can dig it up.
You might have a different point of view if you would have spent 300 hours building a trail, by hand, to your liking and level, and have lesser riders come in and level features and create go arounds. I have fought that battle and won. Threats have been made and taken seriously.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
89,399
27,620
media blackout
You might have a different point of view if you would have spent 300 hours building a trail, by hand, to your liking and level, and have lesser riders come in and level features and create go arounds. I have fought that battle and won. Threats have been made and taken seriously.
Built on your own property?
 

jrewing

Monkey
Aug 22, 2010
450
311
Maydena Oz
We've got a company here in QLD that petitions all the councils to allow them to bring the trails "up to standard" (for a fee of course) and then runs over them with a machine. They not very popular with the core riders, but their stuff is insanely popular with the new riders and flow lovers so their stuff gets enough rider numbers to keep them in business.

I don't have a problem with them making new trails but fucking up existing good trails just to get money sucks.
Cunts
 

SylentK

Turbo Monkey
Feb 25, 2004
2,668
1,109
coloRADo
Alright, trails. Don't get me started. My local "club" which is supposed to be an advocate. And wants money and volunteers. Is just a bunch of suck up pussies. And really don't do shit. And try to make it sound like they do all the shit. And in the end, just eff up trails, if anything. Whateves.

So what about manufacturing? Innovation? Getting stuff done? Distribution? All LBS's, etc.

If moar people ride. But no moar trails are created. Not cool.

But....people will probably still buy the latest 65mm bong chamber Fox suspension hop up thingy. Cuz it's cool. :D
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,757
1,278
NORCAL is the hizzle
I am saying that good trails are the ones where the builders take the time to route the trails to maximize the use of available natural features select challenging lines, give riders options etc. Shitty trails are the ones where people randomly pick a route on a map, bust out mini-dozers and copy and paste the same doubles and berms that can be found anywhere like it was a franchised boomer restaurant. I am not discrediting the effort of trailbuilders but noting the most important work goes into the picking the route, not the "building" that comes afterwords.
Completely agree with most of this, except the part about picking one or the other as more important, because hat discounts the value of the other part. There are tons of folks who never pick up a shovel and a lot of them seem to think trails are just sitting there waiting to be "found". And there are great trails someone found but then spent tons of time working on, including the build but also getting approvals, etc. In some of those cases it probably would have been easier to build a shitty flow trail in a different location.
 

rideit

Bob the Builder
Aug 24, 2004
25,109
12,770
In the cleavage of the Tetons
A lot of places on public land have a N=N policy regarding trail density, usually due to wildlife/erosion issues. Here, in general, if a new trail s created, an existing trail would be decommissioned. This is changing, and there are obvious outliers, like at Ski Resorts and Teton Pass.
 

iRider

Turbo Monkey
Apr 5, 2008
5,840
3,343
But....people will probably still buy the latest 65mm bong chamber Fox suspension hop up thingy. Cuz it's cool. :D
Do you know how many people ride expensive bikes around that hardly or ever see real trails here in Europe? Even worse for eMTBs. Same demographic that needs a SUV or overlander vehicle to get the groceries.
 

iRider

Turbo Monkey
Apr 5, 2008
5,840
3,343
Thanks Seth... that's so far the most blatantly wrong statement of this entire thread.
Well done! :brow::clapping::thumbsdown:
While I agree with you, I think trails in the US are overhyped sometimes. When I did my first ride on Alpine trail in Oakridge, OR, the statements that I read before were "better than anything in the Alps", so my expectations were really high. While the trail is awesome, I have a hard time seeing this statement to be true.
So Seth's statement is partially correct, because in Europe you historically have many more ancient hiking paths that can serve as awesome biking trails. For example, in the regions where the frontlines of WWI were, there is a vast network of trails that are all pretty awesome.
 

DaveW

Space Monkey
Jul 2, 2001
11,744
3,231
The bunker at parliament
While I agree with you, I think trails in the US are overhyped sometimes. When I did my first ride on Alpine trail in Oakridge, OR, the statements that I read before were "better than anything in the Alps", so my expectations were really high. While the trail is awesome, I have a hard time seeing this statement to be true.
So Seth's statement is partially correct, because in Europe you historically have many more ancient hiking paths that can serve as awesome biking trails. For example, in the regions where the frontlines of WWI were, there is a vast network of trails that are all pretty awesome.
Think you need to think outside of the usual Euro and North American sports culture hegemony mindset mate. ;)
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,567
8,483
SADL
Built on your own property?
Well, technically, it was.

I was with the organization for 10 years and played a big part of the 300 acres land purchase. So the trails that I've built were approved and on protected land. I left the organization 4 years ago and since then a new breed of geriatric took over and are now modifying trails to suit their lack of abilities.
 

canadmos

Cake Tease
May 29, 2011
22,370
22,121
Canaderp
I mean really the argument itself is incredibly stupid. Who gives a shit where a trail came from or what its history is? If its good, its good. If its shit, its shit. I don't care if a donkey trudged on it 7000 years ago.
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,567
8,483
SADL
I mean really the argument itself is incredibly stupid. Who gives a shit where a trail came from or what its history is? If its good, its good. If its shit, its shit. I don't care if a donkey trudged on it 7000 years ago.
Ah, the Germans and their 'superior' everything... :D
 

Gary

my pronouns are hag/gis
Aug 27, 2002
8,653
6,567
UK
We had a small pumptrack made with asphalt in my town that was costed, and bloody accepted at $504000.
Can't tell if your use of "bloody" is intended to portray your disdain or joy?
Depending on size, location and expertise of the track construction company cost doesn't sound all that outrageous to me for a professionally built and designed asphalt pumptrack in 2025
This is my local Velosolutions track.
1737031707739.png


Think the final cost was somewhere around £100000 five years ago.
funded by a local parent group who found they had some money left over after fundraising to upgrading the kids play park next to the waste ground the pumptrack has new been built on. They didn't really know what to spend it on but had an idea about building a bmx track. I spoke with Lyndsey the chairperson and explained to her that a professionally built pumptrack would cost a bit more but be a far more versatile project and a far better use of their money. We had various meetings with the community and the council and once the idea had taken root, They raised awareness of the need for the pumptrack and applied for a council and national lottery grants. a year or so later the track was built.
it's an amazing addition to the local community.

opening day vid


The last page of this thread reads like a yawnfest of old folk spouting shit about what they like to ride best and moaning about what they don't.
Maybe I'm just lucky enough to live reasonably close to a massive variety of riding where respectfully sharing it isn't really a problem.
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,872
5,717
Ottawa, Canada
You might have a different point of view if you would have spent 300 hours building a trail, by hand, to your liking and level, and have lesser riders come in and level features and create go arounds. I have fought that battle and won. Threats have been made and taken seriously.
I get your point. But this is the opposite situation. They took an established trail and completely bulldozed it, and brought it up "au gout du jour". It's on a mildly inclined ridge, and the old trail pretty much followed the natural contours of the ridge, with a few slabby outcroppings you could roll over/pump down. They took that, put crushed stone as the trail surface, and a bunch of swoopy berms that don't really follow the flow of the trail. It used to be fun going down and a bit of a challenge going up. There were no issues with user conflict (bikers going in both directions and/or hikers) because the lines of sight were good, and it was easy to slow down. The new layout is full of blind corners, and very tight berms that aren't high enough to carry speed. the crushed stone surface compounds the issue. and going up now doesn't require any skill, just a good engine (or e-motor). For perspective, beforehand, you could ride it on a gravel bike with proper fat tires. it would have been jarring, but doable. Now you can do it on a $200 Canadian Tire city hybrid. I see it a few times a year.

It really angers me that they put so much effort and resources into ruining the trail. These are public funds, and they didn't really think about what the majority of users want, they pretty much focused on the desires of a few beginners and retirees who don't know how to ride (I know this because I actually showed up to some "dig days"). It angers me even more that they aren't recognizing the error of their original design, and allowing the trail to return to its more natural flow.
 

iRider

Turbo Monkey
Apr 5, 2008
5,840
3,343
Think you need to think outside of the usual Euro and North American sports culture hegemony mindset mate. ;)
I know what you are saying (and where you are located), but still the argument stands: historically, many more people were living in Europe, many more alpine towns existing and many of those were only accessible on foot/horseback until fairly recently. Then we had smuggle and WWI. Hence there is a really large network of trails in existence.
Not saying that awesome trails do not exist in other places and some of them are fairly old too, but the vast amount of trails in alpine terrain can hardly be matched by any other region that I know of. But please enlighten me, I could be wrong. :-)
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,872
5,717
Ottawa, Canada
I mean really the argument itself is incredibly stupid. Who gives a shit where a trail came from or what its history is? If its good, its good. If its shit, its shit. I don't care if a donkey trudged on it 7000 years ago.
I think what he's saying is that it's because of history that they have awesome trails. not that the history is what makes the trails awesome. This is a neat little read. This one is more modern, but equally interesting.

having hiked some of those "7000 year old" trails (though I think it's probably closer to 2000-3000 years ago), I have to agree that the quantity and quality of those little known, and little publicized trails are awesome. I haven't encountered anything similar on this continent (though in South America there's amazing ones too). Not saying they don't exist here, just that I haven't found them or ridden them.
 

SylentK

Turbo Monkey
Feb 25, 2004
2,668
1,109
coloRADo
Hey @Gary

We've got a new Velosolutions track. It's probably twice that size with lots of options.

Question: Do you do it directional? Ours doesn't say anything about direction. Not that it really matters, but one guy said you enter the berms where the red line has "this" like the white thing. Which I thought that would be the exit. IDK.

Like I said, it doesn't really matter.

Just trying to get some other's perspectives.
 

sethimus

neu bizutch
Feb 5, 2006
5,426
2,500
not in Whistler anymore :/
I mean really the argument itself is incredibly stupid. Who gives a shit where a trail came from or what its history is? If its good, its good. If its shit, its shit. I don't care if a donkey trudged on it 7000 years ago.
thing is, a trailbuilder always has bikes in his mind when building natural trails, but they would never make trails as awkwardly techy as some century old non bike trails are. and that’s the beauty of these types of trails. those trails evolved over time, eroded and can’t be used anymore like they were originally intended (to transport goods from the valley floor up to the small settlements, alps etc way above the mountains, with mules, bulls and/or carts). but the erosion has made them interesting through their randomness. a purposeful build trails doesn‘t have this randomness.

clear now what i mean?
 

Andeh

Customer Title
Mar 3, 2020
1,236
1,197
Maybe I'm just lucky enough to live reasonably close to a massive variety of riding where respectfully sharing it isn't really a problem.
You really are. Scotland's attitude towards outdoor activities and trails sounds amazing.
 

chuffer

Turbo Monkey
Sep 2, 2004
1,937
1,330
McMinnville, OR
The old (ancient) pathways and trails in the Japanese mtns were an absolute blast to ride. So much rocky steep jank. Of course, there was the occasional hike-a-bike too. The best part was is that, bc of the history as a kind of infrastructure, they typically ran from town to town, which meant train access.

I really enjoyed those trails, but I also really enjoy bike specific trails.

What were we talking about, again?
 

dump

Turbo Monkey
Oct 12, 2001
8,563
5,341
The old (ancient) pathways and trails in the Japanese mtns were an absolute blast to ride. So much rocky steep jank. Of course, there was the occasional hike-a-bike too. The best part was is that, bc of the history as a kind of infrastructure, they typically ran from town to town, which meant train access.

I really enjoyed those trails, but I also really enjoy bike specific trails.

What were we talking about, again?
I do love trails that go somewhere and serve a purpose. It was neat to go to the castle earlier this week. Turns out it’s from the 11the century!
 

Gary

my pronouns are hag/gis
Aug 27, 2002
8,653
6,567
UK
Hey @Gary

We've got a new Velosolutions track. It's probably twice that size with lots of options.

Question: Do you do it directional? Ours doesn't say anything about direction. Not that it really matters, but one guy said you enter the berms where the red line has "this" like the white thing. Which I thought that would be the exit. IDK.

Like I said, it doesn't really matter.

Just trying to get some other's perspectives.
No. The beauty of a well designed velo solutions track is that it's completely open for interpretation, new gaps n lines. Even for the very best riders.
Etiquette is closer to a skate park but because it's often full of little kids there's less elitism.
The red line seem to just be more of a line of sight/point of reference thing and *probably* also helps keep beginners on track.
Here you can see young Logan riding it in both directions. There are also plenty gap/transfers which would change your direction

 
Last edited: