If the CCC built it, it's likely gonna be a fun trail.Someone probably built that trail you found. Just sayin'.
If the CCC built it, it's likely gonna be a fun trail.Someone probably built that trail you found. Just sayin'.
Probably, yeah, sure. So what was your point? Every trail I've ridden was found AND built, at least to some extent. I don't think it was your intent, but saying they can just be found fully baked and ready to go seems to discredit that work.Like when I have built trails?
Probably, yeah, sure. So what was your point? Every trail I've ridden was found AND built, at least to some extent. I don't think it was your intent, but saying they can just be found fully baked and ready to go seems to discredit that work.
You might have a different point of view if you would have spent 300 hours building a trail, by hand, to your liking and level, and have lesser riders come in and level features and create go arounds. I have fought that battle and won. Threats have been made and taken seriously.meh, not sure I fully agree. trails evolve. it's natural. people have different visions, styles, and preferences etc... I hate bermkake and flow trails as much as the next monkey. Out here, we had the land manager rebuild an old natural trail. bermkaked the fuck out of it. any attempt to cut out the switchbacks and ride the old line are promptly filled in with debris and branches by the retired people who have the time to go in and "fix" the trails. drives me nuts. your berms and switchbacks kill the flow. IMnsHO, if a new line gets ridden in, then there's probably a good reason for it. To be clear, I'm not talking about one-off strava lines, but fully burned in lines here.
I can't remember if it was on Pinkbike or on NSMB a few years ago where a trail builder talked about that process of "gifting their trail to the world, but needing to accept that it might evolve and change from his personal vision of it"... I'll see if I can dig it up.
All too often, the worst trails are paid for.The best trails are found, not built.
Amencopy and paste the same doubles and berms that can be found anywhere like it was a franchised boomer restaurant
Built on your own property?You might have a different point of view if you would have spent 300 hours building a trail, by hand, to your liking and level, and have lesser riders come in and level features and create go arounds. I have fought that battle and won. Threats have been made and taken seriously.
CuntsWe've got a company here in QLD that petitions all the councils to allow them to bring the trails "up to standard" (for a fee of course) and then runs over them with a machine. They not very popular with the core riders, but their stuff is insanely popular with the new riders and flow lovers so their stuff gets enough rider numbers to keep them in business.
I don't have a problem with them making new trails but fucking up existing good trails just to get money sucks.
There's a place. Near the in n out burger.
these trails can ONLY be found on the old continentthe best trails didn't start as bike trails
Completely agree with most of this, except the part about picking one or the other as more important, because hat discounts the value of the other part. There are tons of folks who never pick up a shovel and a lot of them seem to think trails are just sitting there waiting to be "found". And there are great trails someone found but then spent tons of time working on, including the build but also getting approvals, etc. In some of those cases it probably would have been easier to build a shitty flow trail in a different location.I am saying that good trails are the ones where the builders take the time to route the trails to maximize the use of available natural features select challenging lines, give riders options etc. Shitty trails are the ones where people randomly pick a route on a map, bust out mini-dozers and copy and paste the same doubles and berms that can be found anywhere like it was a franchised boomer restaurant. I am not discrediting the effort of trailbuilders but noting the most important work goes into the picking the route, not the "building" that comes afterwords.
Do you know how many people ride expensive bikes around that hardly or ever see real trails here in Europe? Even worse for eMTBs. Same demographic that needs a SUV or overlander vehicle to get the groceries.But....people will probably still buy the latest 65mm bong chamber Fox suspension hop up thingy. Cuz it's cool.
While I agree with you, I think trails in the US are overhyped sometimes. When I did my first ride on Alpine trail in Oakridge, OR, the statements that I read before were "better than anything in the Alps", so my expectations were really high. While the trail is awesome, I have a hard time seeing this statement to be true.Thanks Seth... that's so far the most blatantly wrong statement of this entire thread.
Well done!
Think you need to think outside of the usual Euro and North American sports culture hegemony mindset mate.While I agree with you, I think trails in the US are overhyped sometimes. When I did my first ride on Alpine trail in Oakridge, OR, the statements that I read before were "better than anything in the Alps", so my expectations were really high. While the trail is awesome, I have a hard time seeing this statement to be true.
So Seth's statement is partially correct, because in Europe you historically have many more ancient hiking paths that can serve as awesome biking trails. For example, in the regions where the frontlines of WWI were, there is a vast network of trails that are all pretty awesome.
i‘m talking about old mule and smuggler paths, connecting remote settlements and countries. you neither have thoseThanks Seth... that's so far the most blatantly wrong statement of this entire thread.
Well done!
Well, technically, it was.Built on your own property?
i‘m talking about old mule and smuggler paths, connecting remote settlements and countries. you neither have those
Ah, the Germans and their 'superior' everything...I mean really the argument itself is incredibly stupid. Who gives a shit where a trail came from or what its history is? If its good, its good. If its shit, its shit. I don't care if a donkey trudged on it 7000 years ago.
Can't tell if your use of "bloody" is intended to portray your disdain or joy?We had a small pumptrack made with asphalt in my town that was costed, and bloody accepted at $504000.
I get your point. But this is the opposite situation. They took an established trail and completely bulldozed it, and brought it up "au gout du jour". It's on a mildly inclined ridge, and the old trail pretty much followed the natural contours of the ridge, with a few slabby outcroppings you could roll over/pump down. They took that, put crushed stone as the trail surface, and a bunch of swoopy berms that don't really follow the flow of the trail. It used to be fun going down and a bit of a challenge going up. There were no issues with user conflict (bikers going in both directions and/or hikers) because the lines of sight were good, and it was easy to slow down. The new layout is full of blind corners, and very tight berms that aren't high enough to carry speed. the crushed stone surface compounds the issue. and going up now doesn't require any skill, just a good engine (or e-motor). For perspective, beforehand, you could ride it on a gravel bike with proper fat tires. it would have been jarring, but doable. Now you can do it on a $200 Canadian Tire city hybrid. I see it a few times a year.You might have a different point of view if you would have spent 300 hours building a trail, by hand, to your liking and level, and have lesser riders come in and level features and create go arounds. I have fought that battle and won. Threats have been made and taken seriously.
I know what you are saying (and where you are located), but still the argument stands: historically, many more people were living in Europe, many more alpine towns existing and many of those were only accessible on foot/horseback until fairly recently. Then we had smuggle and WWI. Hence there is a really large network of trails in existence.Think you need to think outside of the usual Euro and North American sports culture hegemony mindset mate.
I think most of the good trails Seth is talking about are on swiss, austrian, italian and french ground.Ah, the Germans and their 'superior' everything...
I think what he's saying is that it's because of history that they have awesome trails. not that the history is what makes the trails awesome. This is a neat little read. This one is more modern, but equally interesting.I mean really the argument itself is incredibly stupid. Who gives a shit where a trail came from or what its history is? If its good, its good. If its shit, its shit. I don't care if a donkey trudged on it 7000 years ago.
thing is, a trailbuilder always has bikes in his mind when building natural trails, but they would never make trails as awkwardly techy as some century old non bike trails are. and that’s the beauty of these types of trails. those trails evolved over time, eroded and can’t be used anymore like they were originally intended (to transport goods from the valley floor up to the small settlements, alps etc way above the mountains, with mules, bulls and/or carts). but the erosion has made them interesting through their randomness. a purposeful build trails doesn‘t have this randomness.I mean really the argument itself is incredibly stupid. Who gives a shit where a trail came from or what its history is? If its good, its good. If its shit, its shit. I don't care if a donkey trudged on it 7000 years ago.
You really are. Scotland's attitude towards outdoor activities and trails sounds amazing.Maybe I'm just lucky enough to live reasonably close to a massive variety of riding where respectfully sharing it isn't really a problem.
I do love trails that go somewhere and serve a purpose. It was neat to go to the castle earlier this week. Turns out it’s from the 11the century!The old (ancient) pathways and trails in the Japanese mtns were an absolute blast to ride. So much rocky steep jank. Of course, there was the occasional hike-a-bike too. The best part was is that, bc of the history as a kind of infrastructure, they typically ran from town to town, which meant train access.
I really enjoyed those trails, but I also really enjoy bike specific trails.
What were we talking about, again?
on our local vs pumptrack the accepted flow is in a counter clockwise route (coming out to the right and dropping in from there the redbull tent on the bottom is in the pic).
View attachment 224874
No. The beauty of a well designed velo solutions track is that it's completely open for interpretation, new gaps n lines. Even for the very best riders.Hey @Gary
We've got a new Velosolutions track. It's probably twice that size with lots of options.
Question: Do you do it directional? Ours doesn't say anything about direction. Not that it really matters, but one guy said you enter the berms where the red line has "this" like the white thing. Which I thought that would be the exit. IDK.
Like I said, it doesn't really matter.
Just trying to get some other's perspectives.