with the real estate market tanking it doesn't look like we will be selling our place anytime soon. We just had the pod brought back from storage and unloaded it today [had all our wither clothes and gear in it]
I am perplexed by the idea of getting a small fuel efficient car followed by bolting a bunch of stuff on the roof that ruins the aerodynamics. I'm making this statement, though, with no quantitative idea of how much racks actually cost people in terms of gas mileage.
I am perplexed by the idea of getting a small fuel efficient car followed by bolting a bunch of stuff on the roof that ruins the aerodynamics. I'm making this statement, though, with no quantitative idea of how much racks actually cost people in terms of gas mileage.
Well for one the bike will not fit inside the vehicle, and two it only takes a few minutes to disconnect the rail footers and lift the entire rack system off as a whole unit. I don't anticipate leaving it on the roof if we aren't riding that day or weekend.
I am perplexed by the idea of getting a small fuel efficient car followed by bolting a bunch of stuff on the roof that ruins the aerodynamics. I'm making this statement, though, with no quantitative idea of how much racks actually cost people in terms of gas mileage.
not that it's exactly a wind tunnel medal winner, but my 94 Subaru Legacy got about 27mpg before i put the full upright racks on and it gets about 26mpg with two bikes on top at highway speeds; although, i can't go through any drive-thru's with bikes on top
I am perplexed by the idea of getting a small fuel efficient car followed by bolting a bunch of stuff on the roof that ruins the aerodynamics. I'm making this statement, though, with no quantitative idea of how much racks actually cost people in terms of gas mileage.
Car and Driver recently conducted a gas mileage test to determine the accuracy of commonly held fuel economy conceptions. The test scenario was to drive one vehicle around a 2.5 mile oval at steady speeds (35, 55, and 75mph) and measure fuel economy from the vehicle's OBD II data port. They repeated the circuits under a variety of conditions (cargo added, windows down, etc.) and compared the results. The findings are the best yet to help quantify the effects of these conditions on fuel economy.
The number one fuel sapping situation is driving with the air conditioner on and windows up. At 35 MPH there was a 15.3% reduction in fuel economy. At the same speed the fuel economy only suffers a drop of 1.6% with a roof rack and cargo box.
We were pretty sure that cargo boxes were the best thing going to help people downsize from big vehicles as everyday drivers. Cargo boxes add extra cargo capacity to a small vehicle but are only on when needed, it's the right way to get the best fuel economy in every driving situation. With this new Car and Driver test it is now really in perspective. See the full article in the December issue, at news stands now.
I know it does on my 97 CRV. There are a few small hills on the highway between me and Loco's house, and it is a fight to keep the car from constantly downshifting out of D4 into D3. If there is any headwind, it gets really annoying.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.