I would have :biggrin:Unfortunately it was dead. I didn't want to be morbid and whip out the camera
I know I was very close to having another petPoor little hamster.
That thing looks so f'ing scared.
In my eyes:Damn, Rob, you're a sensitive guy. :biggrin:
People DO suck, though. Not a pet person myself, but I think that's better than pretending to be a pet person when you're really just a baby animal person who dumps their charge in the closest park when it's moving time, relationship break-up time or the animal grows up.
I was thinking along the same lines although your timeline (1.8 hours) was far more generous than my 20 minutes :biggrin:vole was my first thought too.
a pet shop hamster would last about 1.8 hrs in the wild, and there'd be no trace of its existence.
Ever seen a baby(human) born? No sin there besides original sin.In my eyes:
Humans are not inherently innocent of anything.
Animals are inherently innocent of just about everything.
Why not let the punishment fit the crime? Perhaps dropping the pet abandoner off 100 miles south of Khartoum with naught but a compass, a roll of TP and a Captain America costume?People who dump animals for the above reason would have it too good if they were drawn and quartered.
Good point on the newborn. Never really thought of it that way. You're right that the animal kingdom is a wicked place, but humans should know the difference between moral right and wrong. I wouldn't expect an animal (save for higher primates) to even have an inkling.Ever seen a baby(human) born? No sin there besides original sin.
Human capacity for cruelty exceeds that of animals in direct proportion to their increased cognitive ability and creativity. I have seen behavior in the animal kingdom nothing less than wicked, but of course, we should know better.
Why not let the punishment fit the crime? Perhaps dropping the pet abandoner off 100 miles south of Khartoum with naught but a compass, a roll of TP and a Captain America costume?
Plain and simple, humans are animals and behave as such. Morals are just ideas, not natural concepts. Psychopathic dolphins are a natural phenomenon observed around the world. Groups of chimps like to go on war campaigns and eat their enemies. There are some evolution explanations for such behavior and its not unique to humans.You're right that the animal kingdom is a wicked place, but humans should know the difference between moral right and wrong. I wouldn't expect an animal (save for higher primates) to even have an inkling.
Quite correct, and bottlenose dolphins have even been witnessed killing youth of their own kind and playing "volleyball" with the corpses. Intrinsic genetic dispersal drive causes usurping Alpha males of some species to kill all infants in their group that they did not specifically father. Additionally, physical features sometimes adapt over eons to facilitate such violence, e.g. exaggerated schlongs on donkeys which enable them to "rape" mares and induce miscarriage of foals fathered by other males. It's a violent world we live in and only your own formidability improves your survival statistics and those bearing your DNA.Plain and simple, humans are animals and behave as such. Morals are just ideas, not natural concepts. Psychopathic dolphins are a natural phenomenon observed around the world. Groups of chimps like to go on war campaigns and eat their enemies. There are some evolution explanations for such behavior and is not unique to humans.
You mean to tell me Walt Disney was lying to us :biggrin:It's a violent world we live in and only your own formidability improves your survival statistics and those bearing your DNA.
The bastard! Somebody should unplug his cryogenic coffin just for that.You mean to tell me Walt Disney was lying to us :biggrin: