Quantcast

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
I like Richard Branson's style.....

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2008717282_hazy07.html

At an interview at the reception, Branson expressed anger at how much the Machinist strike cost V Australia, the new international unit of his Virgin Blue airline in Australia.

His passengers were left stranded because V Australia's new 777-300ER, parked Friday on Boeing Field, wasn't available for the peak holiday-travel season down under, Branson said.

"It was a horrible mess that Boeing was on strike. We messed up tens of thousands of passengers over Christmas," he said. "We had to buy tickets on other airlines and scramble to get seats which weren't available. The financial damage in an industry where the margins are minute is catastrophic."

Boeing contracts typically include a provision that it is not required to pay airlines compensation for delays due to strikes.

"We're already thinking there's another lot of planes we want to order. Do we give it to Boeing or should we go to Airbus, which doesn't go on strike?" Branson said. "We have a choice. Do we have to come back to Boeing? If there's a danger of ever having another strike, we won't."

At this point, Branson turned to Udvar-Hazy and said Udvar-Hazy had been making the same point at dinner last night.

"You can't deal with companies that are unreliable," Udvar-Hazy said.

At the suggestion that Boeing could hardly guarantee no future strikes, Branson said he would have to examine whether Boeing has "an unreliable management/work-force situation."

"Britain was plagued by strikes 30 years ago," added Branson, who is English. "America should have got over this by now."
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
my butt still hurts from the last time i got "paged" on capitol hill
 

Secret Squirrel

There is no Justice!
Dec 21, 2004
8,150
1
Up sh*t creek, without a paddle
I just saw a recent headline from the Seattle Times saying that Boing had lost 15 (or 18...) 787 orders in the past 3 weeks...


Whoops...


In a related matter, the first time I heard someone mention "the Virgin Megastore in NYC", I thought we'd all gone Muslim.
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
Hm, management punishes labor for unionizing and wanting to stop outsourcing, what a shock.
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
Companies are there to service the customer. If they stop doing that, they become irrelevant, no?

I'll never forget it this. I was in a meeting when I was working at Boeing. They were arguing about something, and one guy said, "Look. We're all here to build airplanes". The manager cut him off and said "No. We're here to make money".

A very important distinction.......
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
i think they're both right

as a business venture, blockbuster exists to offer movie & gaming alternatives to potential customers. they making money by keeping the customer base, not the other way around.
 

Samirol

Turbo Monkey
Jun 23, 2008
1,437
0
no, when unions prevent a business from being profitable, its a major problem.
unions only go on strike after the business refuses to work with them, all they wanted was job security in the age of outsourcing, that isn't an insane demand.
 
Last edited:

dante

Unabomber
Feb 13, 2004
8,807
9
looking for classic NE singletrack
More like 31 cancellations.......
Hmmmm, wonder how much those 31 cancellations are costing Boeing compared to what the union was demanding? There's always two sides to an argument, and I wouldn't say that management is completely blameless...



On a less serious note, who exactly is Branson going to go to for airplanes, Airbus? :rofl: Good luck with that, they're only what, a couple years behind on their a380?
 

Secret Squirrel

There is no Justice!
Dec 21, 2004
8,150
1
Up sh*t creek, without a paddle
I think the most amusing part is "after the business refuses to work with them"...

really?

No, really?

That's how it's gonna work, huh?

Talking about going on strike as a "negotiation tactic" is only a thinly veiled threat that hurts everyone. Awesome.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
24
SF, CA
all they wanted was job security in the age of outsourcing, that isn't an insane demand.
It IS an insane demand, because you cannot DEMAND job security.

Extortion may get them a short term gain but make no mistake it is absolutely at the expense of long term job security.

edit: To make my point both specific and painfully obvious, is it lost on you that this move may prevent outsourcing but may also cause layoffs at the same time? Great, instead of moving those 1000 jobs to China and India, no one gets them.
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
"Britain was plagued by strikes 30 years ago," added Branson, who is English. "America should have got over this by now."
I remember the turmoil of the Thatcher era. I don't know much about it, but I wonder how it was resolved?
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
86,083
24,611
media blackout
unions only go on strike after the business refuses to work with them, all they wanted was job security in the age of outsourcing, that isn't an insane demand.
What's insane is that union workers are demanding white collar compensation for blue collar jobs and blue collar skills.
 

Inclag

Turbo Monkey
Sep 9, 2001
2,752
442
MA
unions only go on strike after the business refuses to work with them, all they wanted was job security in the age of outsourcing, that isn't an insane demand.
Do you believe it is wrong for a company to use laborers of equal skill and quality at a lower cost if there is a large market of laborers that work at lower salaries? And no, these cheaper workers aren't people in a Chinese sweatshop as a union would like you to believe.
 

SkaredShtles

Michael Bolton
Sep 21, 2003
65,847
12,837
In a van.... down by the river
Do you believe it is wrong for a company to use laborers of equal skill and quality at a lower cost if there is a large market of laborers that work at lower salaries? And no, these cheaper workers aren't people in a Chinese sweatshop as a union would like you to believe.
Dude. Seriously. He's like talking to a big, retarded brick wall. :D
 

JohnE

filthy rascist
May 13, 2005
13,452
1,980
Front Range, dude...
Sounds like Branson should have leveraged his $$ against Boeing AND the machinists...something along the lines of "You both want my money, now play nice and build my airplanes or neither one of you gets it..."
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
On a less serious note, who exactly is Branson going to go to for airplanes, Airbus? :rofl: Good luck with that, they're only what, a couple years behind on their a380?
A380 has been type certified for a year. And how far behind do you think the 787 is going to be when all is said and done?

edit: roll out for the 787 was July 8 2007 (get it? 7-8-7?) Flight testes were supposed to begin shortly after that. They had way bigger problems than the strike. From an engineering standpoint, it was great because they we able catch up on some stuff because the planes weren't moving. But right now they are well over a year behind and they haven't flown yet. In my humble opinion, they are going to be more late than the A380 ended up being......

edit #2.... and Branson is right to be royally pissed. The dollar figures when calculating lost revenue when an airplane sits idle is just staggering. Like hundreds of thousands per day. When they plan around having an airplane, and it ain't there when it's supposed to be, means HUGE financial implications.
 
Last edited: