Shall I stow my tin foil hat?
- Thread starter MMike
- Start date
When you look at the images close up, look at the line of the edge of the grass - It's fairly clear where it transistions into other buildings in the background.
I'm not saying I'm sure you're 100% wrong but to me your nose/cockpit seem to be part of the detail of those buildings.
The thing you have identified as wing seems to be the only anomaly in that line I can find.
I'm not saying I'm sure you're 100% wrong but to me your nose/cockpit seem to be part of the detail of those buildings.
The thing you have identified as wing seems to be the only anomaly in that line I can find.
I KNOW WHAT I SEE DAMNIT!!! :mumble:Changleen said:
Calm down dude, I'm just trying to have a discussion.pixelninja said:
Have you actually looked at the other frames? And I wasn't going to say anything, but if that IS the nose and cockpit, isn't the 'wing' a little far forwards? If it's not the wing what is it? As I said, to me it appears your wing is the only out of place object in the frame.
I watched five various minutes of it, and even if a conspiracy is true, it's a very poorly done movie.stevew said:
The narrator at one point is talking about the engines and how much they weigh, and that they have titanium in them, and then he asks the rhetorical question: "How does 6 tons of titanium disappear?"
I didn't know that aircraft engines were made exclusively of titanium. By that rationale, my entire body is made up of the same material as my teeth...
The group that requested this footage under the FoI act is apparently a well known conservative group. They're called Judicial Watch. I don't know too much about them but it could be a ploy to take pressure off Bush. Decide for yourself. www.judicialwatch.org/about.shtml
They call themselves non-partisan but even a cursory look at their site reveals an N8 like infatuation with the Clintons (Hilary Watch section). Enough to make me question their bona-fides.stevew said:
He doesn't look anything like Marlon Brando.stevew said:
Down under we pass to the left (you know, got to do with why water spins opposite way in the toilet bowl) and we only puff once, we aren't that greedyjimmydean said:
If you look closely there is a white Ford Pinto in the first frame and it appears to be rolling backwards towards the Pentagon (guess the parking brake failed). Then a few frames later it hits the building and there's this massive fireball...
psst...I was jokingChangleen said:Calm down dude, I'm just trying to have a discussion.
Improved:Changleen said:Ha!
http://www.benettonplay.com/toys/flipbook/flipbook_player.php?id=1147916215-121551802
It looks like a Giant OCLV but the official report says it was a Kona Stinky Deelux! 
I don't see a faux bar linkage in the wreckage either! Do you really expect me to believe that much metal could just vapourise on impact? The hole was pretty tiny, which would make sense if it was only hit by a little bit of CF. The Stinky would have made much more of a mess.
I don't see a faux bar linkage in the wreckage either! Do you really expect me to believe that much metal could just vapourise on impact? The hole was pretty tiny, which would make sense if it was only hit by a little bit of CF. The Stinky would have made much more of a mess.
The release of this clip makes me even more skeptical of the "official" story. There were 8-10 cameras recording the events of what happened on that side of the Pent., and this is the best they can do???
Lets see the clip from the gas station across the freeway or how about a clip from one of the upper deck cameras looking outward or how about any view that isnt perpendicular to the impact zone!
Just give us a view that can be clearly examined and allow people to actually judge for themselves, rather than the media instantly claiming that these incredibly distorted images, are now solid proof that there was no foul play and then right into the history books it goes!? Just like the investigation of that ill conceived, totally corrupt, travesty known as the 911 commission.
Looks like a very skinny nose for a jet liner of that size.
Lets see the clip from the gas station across the freeway or how about a clip from one of the upper deck cameras looking outward or how about any view that isnt perpendicular to the impact zone!
Just give us a view that can be clearly examined and allow people to actually judge for themselves, rather than the media instantly claiming that these incredibly distorted images, are now solid proof that there was no foul play and then right into the history books it goes!? Just like the investigation of that ill conceived, totally corrupt, travesty known as the 911 commission.
Looks like a very skinny nose for a jet liner of that size.
I concur. Whilst I do believe that 9/11 did not happen as the public believes it did, Loose Change is very poorly done (eg, they state that a B-52 hit the Empire State building, whilst it was a B-25...you know...a fifth of the size)Silver said:
Doesn't get much "long and skinnier" than a 757...3D. said:
Now do one of the WTC !
H8R said:
MMike said:
9:03:11 a.m - bike hits the south tower....
http://www.benettonplay.com/toys/flipbook/flipbook_player.php?id=1148073473-121551802
thats actually a really good interpretation. congratsH8R said:
