With redneck levels of safety engineering to suit.They've turned the 737 MAX into a brodozer.
"No seat belts, we die like men!" - Boeing, presumably.With redneck levels of safety engineering to suit.
It's okay, if the MCAS on that 737 doesn't kill you, the wing slats falling off might.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-48503610
SRS Biznez.The FAA will issue an Airworthiness Directive to mandate Boeing's service actions to identify and remove the discrepant parts from service. Operators of affected aircraft are required to perform this action within 10 days.
Can’t see the article.The Roots of Boeing’s 737 Max Crisis: A Regulator Relaxes Its Oversight (Published 2019)
A Times investigation found that the F.A.A. regulatory process, which gave Boeing significant oversight authority, compromised the safety of the plane.www.nytimes.com
Gravity.A Top Aviation Writer on What Really Brought Down Boeing’s 737 Max https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/18/magazine/boeing-737-max-crashes.html
Unless control surfaces were conspiring to push it down faster than gravity pulls.Gravity.
Boeing killed those people.Unless control surfaces were conspiring to push it down faster than gravity pulls.
The larger system, including Boeing.Boeing killed those people.
Nearly two decades before Boeing’s MCAS system crashed two of the plane-maker’s brand-new 737 MAX jets, Stan Sorscher knew his company’s increasingly toxic mode of operating would create a disaster of some kind. A long and proud “safety culture” was rapidly being replaced, he argued, with “a culture of financial bullshit, a culture of groupthink.”
Sweet baby fucking jesus........MCAS had been a big secret, largely kept from Boeing’s own test pilots, mentioned only once in the glossary of the plane’s 1,600-page manual, left entirely out of the 56-minute iPad refresher course that some 737-certified pilots took for MAX certification, and—in a last-minute edit—removed from the November 7 emergency airworthiness directive the Federal Aviation Administration had issued two weeks after the Lion Air crash, ostensibly to “remind” pilots of the protocol for responding to a “runaway stabilizer.” Most pilots first heard about MCAS from their unions, which had in turn gotten wind of the software from a supplementary bulletin Boeing sent airlines to accompany the airworthiness directive.
The engineers who created the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) flight-control system more than a decade ago for the military refueling plane designed the system to rely on inputs from multiple sensors and with limited power to move aircraft's nose, the Journal said on.wsj.com/2mOypqT.
The newspaper cited one person familiar with the design saying this approach was taken in order to guard against the system acting erroneously or causing a pilot to lose control.
In contrast, the version of MCAS on the 737 MAX passenger plane relied on input from just one of two sensors which measure the angle at which the plane’s nose is flying, the newspaper said.
That was a pretty impressive incident.Paging @Pesqueeb, to the white courtesy phone please, we have a little trouble with possessed catering carts.
11M views · 48K reactions | Catering Cart Is Out Of Control | This catering cart has a mind of its own | By LADbible | Facebook
This catering cart has a mind of its ownwww.facebook.com
Boeing 777X’s fuselage split dramatically during September stress test
When Boeing's new 777X suffered a ground test failure in early September, the damage was much more alarming than previously reported. It wasn't a cargo door blowout. It was worse.www.seattletimes.com
They aren't trying hard enough. A. A. beats them in this category.
Try flying whilst Muslim on southwest.They aren't trying hard enough. A. A. beats them in this category.