that was alan hale jr. screaming "Gilligan!"13 seconds in....
Its not completely clear but it does sound a lot like kill him.
(sorry tried to embed but it just isn't working for me today)
dude's totally lost it
that was alan hale jr. screaming "Gilligan!"13 seconds in....
Its not completely clear but it does sound a lot like kill him.
(sorry tried to embed but it just isn't working for me today)
Clearly the work of crazed liberals.The bear had been shot in the head
Dunno, it's NC so I guess it was a black bear. Here comes the race war, fought by proxy with bearz!!!!Clearly the work of crazed liberals.
...and I just heard that McCain/Palin were caught "palling around with bearorists"!Polar bears are arming and forming defense cooperatives as we speak...errr, type.
Well, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't out east here. Either you keep populations low by allowing hunts or they start getting killed because they live off people's trash or get smashed on the highway... then people die too.North carolina has a 'bear season?????'
Fukkin rednecks. Shooting a cub to make a point is pretty weak.
Because before rednecks came along, the world was overrun with bears EVERYWHERE! It's a good thing people are allowed to shot them a few month out of the year. Otherwise we would never be able to build n8mansions in their habitat.Well, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't out east here. Either you keep populations low by allowing hunts or they start getting killed because they live off people's trash or get smashed on the highway... then people die too.
Not near enough open range here.
Even if culling the population is good for the population, shooting a cub is pretty reprehensible.Well, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't out east here. Either you keep populations low by allowing hunts or they start getting killed because they live off people's trash or get smashed on the highway... then people die too.
Not near enough open range here.
Well to be fair, like I said, if the rednecks to didn't pay for the right to be able to kill them, we'd be paying tax dollars to some fish and game guys to keep the populations down. There's just too many people and too much sprawl for the population to remain unchecked. Blame people who decide to have chidren I guess.Because before rednecks came along, the world was overrun with bears EVERYWHERE! It's a good thing people are allowed to shot them a few month out of the year. Otherwise we would never be able to build n8mansions in their habitat.
In this situation, killing a Bear for a political statement obviously seems wrong, regardless of its age. But in general I dont care the age of Bear people shoot.Even if culling the population is good for the population, shooting a cub is pretty reprehensible.
Getting off topic but I still don't buy it.Well, you're damned if you do, damned if you don't out east here. Either you keep populations low by allowing hunts or they start getting killed because they live off people's trash or get smashed on the highway... then people die too.
Not near enough open range here.
Thank you very much, tip your waitresses, try the veal......and I just heard that McCain/Palin were caught "palling around with bearorists"!
Ive taken some courses that go pretty in-depth into Bear management. They aren't prolific breeders or anything, but they do require pretty significant acreage for a home range, so when you have as little "wild" land as you do in NC and TN, it doesn't take long for things to get out of control. East TN and West NC actually have the most dense Bear population in the world... particularly the Smokies area... so allowing hunts isn't any more detrimental to them than anything else.Getting off topic but I still don't buy it.
I can't imagine there are more bears in NC than there are here and there's no friggin 'bear season'. I see probably 10-20 a summer, usually in my front yard. I used to ride pisgah and tsali all the time and never once even saw bear shlt.
Drop me some knowledge yo.East TN and West NC actually have the most dense Bear population in the world... particularly the Smokies area... so allowing hunts isn't any more detrimental to them than anything else.
Would I want to kill a Bear? Not at all. But it makes sense for people to be allowed to given the data I've seen.
Drop me some knowledge yo.
Fish and game have something on this?
http://www.nps.gov/grsm/naturescience/black-bears.htmGreat Smoky Mountains National Park is one of the few places remaining in the eastern United States where black bears can live in wild, natural surroundings. For many, this famous Smokies resident is a symbol of wilderness.
Bears inhabit all elevations of the park. Though populations are variable, counts conducted in 2006 indicated approximately 1,500 bears live in the park. This equals a population density of approximately two bears per square mile
TMI. Please refrain from telling us what you and the bears should keep private.We are filthy with black bears around here...
It could very well be that hunting wasn't yet necessary, but that implementing it beforehand was just being proactive. Either way, as long as the populations aren't drastically declining, I wouldn't have a problem with it. Traditionally bear hunting has been a means of sustenance in the area, from the indians to the squatters who took their land, so having the government come in and deny that when it's not any longer necessity to do so would just be making laws for the sake of doing so. After all, any value we place on a bear above a deer or a mouse in your food pantry that you try to trap is strictly a subjective value judgement. Bears arent on the endangered species list, and while I think they're cool, who am I to declare they have any more right to live than beef cattle or pigs on a farm? If anything, gathering the food manually by hunting things like deer or bear gives a person a better perspective and appreciation for the world than simply buying it off a supermarket shelf would.I'm kind of curious about the reasons for opening a season though. Like number of car accidents etc.....
But those sites are a start.
Thanks.
A lot of people hunt for sport and waste most of the animal compared to the Native Americans though. Plus modern hunting tools/techniques make it much easier.If anything, gathering the food manually by hunting things like deer or bear gives a person a better perspective and appreciation for the world than simply buying it off a supermarket shelf would.
See, this is one of those statements that is (a) not really quantifiable and (b) even if it was, would still just be a personal value judgement. What percentage of an animal should have to be utilized for a person to be able to kill it? 50%? 75%?A lot of people hunt for sport and waste most of the animal compared to the Native Americans though...
Yes, but the states have quotas for the number of bear that are allowed to be killed, so it's not as if the equipment results in any more deaths, and there's also the fact that these modern tools should, in general, make the death much less painful than, say, a rock spear or arrowhead.Plus modern hunting tools/techniques make it much easier.
Its still a point though about wasteful hunting. Bring back the wolf instead and change the balance of the ecosystem rather than just the deer problem.You see what Im getting at here?
While I like the idea of bringing the Wolf back there's a couple things...Its still a point though about wasteful hunting. Bring back the wolf instead and change the balance of the ecosystem rather than just the deer problem.
I was riding at a local park a few weekends ago and some stupid f*ck hunter gutted his deer and left a huge pile literally 15 ft from the park lot
I suppose that's better than just taking the head and leaving the rest
my neighbor dropped an elk @ 150 yds w/ a .308 this wknd.
I agree that it controls population. This is going way too off topicWasteful hunting is a fair topic to discuss, but not a fair means of discrediting hunting at large as a means of population control.
It could very well be that hunting wasn't yet necessary, but that implementing it beforehand was just being proactive. Either way, as long as the populations aren't drastically declining, I wouldn't have a problem with it. Traditionally bear hunting has been a means of sustenance in the area, from the indians to the squatters who took their land, so having the government come in and deny that when it's not any longer necessity to do so would just be making laws for the sake of doing so.
Yeah and I use live mouse traps so I can dump them in unused vacation rentals around here. I'm consistent as fvck.After all, any value we place on a bear above a deer or a mouse in your food pantry that you try to trap is strictly a subjective value judgement. Bears arent on the endangered species list, and while I think they're cool, who am I to declare they have any more right to live than beef cattle or pigs on a farm?
Simple answer is in your reply.Even if culling the population is good for the population, shooting a cub is pretty reprehensible.
just a damn shameRog Coverely said several pellets pierced his Longwood home. Coverely showed several spiderwebbed-holes in the front windows of his home.
People can get pretty hateful when they are failing.Wow...just wow. I know there are crazy people on both sides but I stood in line of 28,000 people (for almost 4 hours) to see Obama last weekend and I heard nothing nearly as crazy and racist as most of those people in the videos.
$5 says he shot up his own place. Liberal Democrats dont have their own guns anyway...some more mccain supporter violencejust a damn shame
http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/member.php?u=6239$5 says he shot up his own place. Liberal Democrats dont have their own guns anyway...