I say NO.
My town's library had a public meeting to discuss the issue tonite.
Those opposed to filtering , argued that the 1st amendement was being trampled if the 'net is filtered. My feeling is that as long as minors can access the computers then LEGALLY (untill the age of 18 here in Washington) they must not view porn. Besides we limit speech all the time. We can't slander, we can't lie under oath, and we can't plagerise.
Those for the filtering were simply asking that no minors have unfettered access to the 'net. Which is good.
Okay, what do you all think?
My town's library had a public meeting to discuss the issue tonite.
Those opposed to filtering , argued that the 1st amendement was being trampled if the 'net is filtered. My feeling is that as long as minors can access the computers then LEGALLY (untill the age of 18 here in Washington) they must not view porn. Besides we limit speech all the time. We can't slander, we can't lie under oath, and we can't plagerise.
Those for the filtering were simply asking that no minors have unfettered access to the 'net. Which is good.
Okay, what do you all think?