Let me be a little more clear. Profro seems to be the only one that was following my train of thought. For current (and through 2012 iirc) emissions regs, the technology exists such that the exhaust does not need to be post-treated with urea. The infrastructure is not there in many areas and consumers may have to worry about their truck shutting itself off because the urea tank is empty (the EPA has stipulated the engines computer must do this). Cummins has chosen to not use this technology until the infrastructure is in place, I feel that Ford should have as well. Thats just my opinion, nowhere did I say that the engineers at Ford are stupid.Urea is fine as long as America puts in the infrastructure to support it. It works well for fleets who fill at designated locations. I saw a really cool dual fuel (diesel + urea) system years ago from Ford that filled both tanks with a single nozzle. But what happens if you get to an area without urea at the pump, does OBD shut your vehicle down?
Mickey, if you don't have anything to add to the conversation fvck off. I don't jump into your skin suit conversations just to be a d!ck.
Seen it from the inside?
Plus... filling a 30-gal tank with diesel and then adding another $35 to fill the urea tank just sounds like a huge headache.