Here is an interesting piece:
The Confusion of Joseph Wilson
21 July 2004
The Senate Intelligence Committees report shows it was Joe Wilson who twisted intelligence to downplay Iraqs nuclear threat, to further his own political agenda of helping Kerry win the election in November.
Memo to the masses: When you see the words misspoken, erred, and confused, in relation to former ambassador Joseph Wilson, know this: These words are typical beltway qualifiers that seek to say in essence that I lied, without ever having to say the word lied.
But as surely as the sun rises and sets upon another Democratic chapter of The conspiracies of President Bush, Joe Wilson has broken the hearts of many a Democrat this week in Washington -- not by lying, no, but by getting caught.
It seems like ages ago that columnist Robert Novak first alerted the public to the doings of the innocuous and relatively unknown Wilson. But in a column written on July 14, 2003, Novak wrote of Wilsons trip to Africa in February of 2002 to see if Saddam Husseins Iraq was trying to buy Uranium, or yellowcake, from Niger.
Fast forward to January 28, 2003 and the presidents State of the Union address: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
It is here in these now-famous 16 words that Democrats in Congress then and now talk themselves into near apoplexy, saying Bush misled the country about pre-war intelligence. But until Wilson went public with a 1400-word op-ed titled What I Didnt Find in Iraq in the New York Times, his findings regarding Iraq trying to purchase uranium went little noticed. It was Wilsons op-ed that not only ignited Congressional Democrats into a political frenzy, but tipped his hand as an official Kerry for President acolyte.
In his New York Times op-ed, Wilson brazenly declared: Based on my experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war, I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraqs nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.
But as the Senate Intelligence Committees July 9 report of this year shows, it is Wilson who twisted intelligence to actually downplay Iraqs nuclear threat, thereby meeting his own political agenda of helping Kerry win the election in November.
Consider the Senate committees findings:
-- The panel found that Wilsons report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, actually bolstered the case for most intelligence analysis, according to the Washington Post.
-- To this day, British intelligence maintains that Saddam Hussein sought uranium in Africa, recently underlined by a report from The Financial Times of London. The British government states, European intelligence officers have now revealed human and electronic intelligence sources from a number of countries picked up repeated discussion of an illicit trade in uranium from Niger. The New York Times paraphrased the above with a clear-cut story titled: Intelligence Backs Claim Iraq Tried to Buy Uranium The essay leaves no doubt as to the claim of Bush in January 2003 that Saddam Hussein was not only was trying to procure uranium, but had been for years.
-- Ambassador Wilsons wife, CIA employee Valerie Plume, specifically recommended Wilson for the trip to Africa. In a memo from Plume dated February 12, 2002 to the deputy chief of the Counterproliferation Division (CPD) from Plume, the Senate report concludes that according to the CIA testimony, Plume offered up his (Wilson) name.
-- Wilson misled the Washington Post in June of 2003, when he told the paper that the Niger intelligence was based on documents that had clearly been forged because "the dates were wrong and the names were wrong." In fact, Wilson had never seen the reports.
When the Senate committee staff asked Wilson how he could have come to that conclusion, Wilson replied he may have misspoken to reporters.
-- Contrary to Wilsons claims that the Bush administration understood that it was knowingly passing along questionable information to the American public, the Senate committee found in its investigations that the CIA did not tell the White House it had its own doubts about an Iraq/Niger connection for the procuring of uranium.
Joseph Wilson has had extensive ties to the Democratic Party throughout much of his time in Washington. Wilson is an unabashed supporter and donor to the Kerry/Edwards campaign for the presidency. In 2000, he donated to Vice President Gores election, as has his wife, Valerie Plume. In the mid-eighties, Wilson worked for Gore as a congressional staffer. He has donated money to such liberal stalwarts as Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy. He has in the recent past spoken to liberal 527 groups like Win Without War, which is a part of MoveOn.org, the premiere liberal hate group that is renowned for its coarse and hate-inspired political sloganeering.
One by one, the presidents accusers, and the conspiracies they inspire, are turning out to be disproved. Former terrorist czar Richard Clarke was shown to be wanting in the credibility department, and now, so is former ambassador Joseph Wilson. It is more than chilling in my mind when I stop to think just what the acquisition of power means to the party out of it. In this case, it is the Democratic Party. It has shown that it and its supporters, like Clarke and Wilson, would willingly throw the country into political Armageddon all in hopes of winning an election.
It is unclear whether good news can travel fast in a media mired in Orwellian reporting. I suspect not, as Im sure this surprises no one interested in the truth. One would hope that the country learns of the mendacity of Joe Wilson, and his willingness to inject his political viewpoints in a time of war, all in the hopes of seeing a Democrat in the White House.
The prolific architect, Frank Lloyd Wright, said The truth is more important than the facts. I would amend his words to say, The truth is that much more important because of the facts. In Joseph Wilson, the fact of the matter is that the truth is not important, regardless of the facts.
The Confusion of Joseph Wilson
21 July 2004
The Senate Intelligence Committees report shows it was Joe Wilson who twisted intelligence to downplay Iraqs nuclear threat, to further his own political agenda of helping Kerry win the election in November.
Memo to the masses: When you see the words misspoken, erred, and confused, in relation to former ambassador Joseph Wilson, know this: These words are typical beltway qualifiers that seek to say in essence that I lied, without ever having to say the word lied.
But as surely as the sun rises and sets upon another Democratic chapter of The conspiracies of President Bush, Joe Wilson has broken the hearts of many a Democrat this week in Washington -- not by lying, no, but by getting caught.
It seems like ages ago that columnist Robert Novak first alerted the public to the doings of the innocuous and relatively unknown Wilson. But in a column written on July 14, 2003, Novak wrote of Wilsons trip to Africa in February of 2002 to see if Saddam Husseins Iraq was trying to buy Uranium, or yellowcake, from Niger.
Fast forward to January 28, 2003 and the presidents State of the Union address: The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
It is here in these now-famous 16 words that Democrats in Congress then and now talk themselves into near apoplexy, saying Bush misled the country about pre-war intelligence. But until Wilson went public with a 1400-word op-ed titled What I Didnt Find in Iraq in the New York Times, his findings regarding Iraq trying to purchase uranium went little noticed. It was Wilsons op-ed that not only ignited Congressional Democrats into a political frenzy, but tipped his hand as an official Kerry for President acolyte.
In his New York Times op-ed, Wilson brazenly declared: Based on my experience with the administration in the months leading up to the war, I have little choice but to conclude that some of the intelligence related to Iraqs nuclear weapons program was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat.
But as the Senate Intelligence Committees July 9 report of this year shows, it is Wilson who twisted intelligence to actually downplay Iraqs nuclear threat, thereby meeting his own political agenda of helping Kerry win the election in November.
Consider the Senate committees findings:
-- The panel found that Wilsons report, rather than debunking intelligence about purported uranium sales to Iraq, actually bolstered the case for most intelligence analysis, according to the Washington Post.
-- To this day, British intelligence maintains that Saddam Hussein sought uranium in Africa, recently underlined by a report from The Financial Times of London. The British government states, European intelligence officers have now revealed human and electronic intelligence sources from a number of countries picked up repeated discussion of an illicit trade in uranium from Niger. The New York Times paraphrased the above with a clear-cut story titled: Intelligence Backs Claim Iraq Tried to Buy Uranium The essay leaves no doubt as to the claim of Bush in January 2003 that Saddam Hussein was not only was trying to procure uranium, but had been for years.
-- Ambassador Wilsons wife, CIA employee Valerie Plume, specifically recommended Wilson for the trip to Africa. In a memo from Plume dated February 12, 2002 to the deputy chief of the Counterproliferation Division (CPD) from Plume, the Senate report concludes that according to the CIA testimony, Plume offered up his (Wilson) name.
-- Wilson misled the Washington Post in June of 2003, when he told the paper that the Niger intelligence was based on documents that had clearly been forged because "the dates were wrong and the names were wrong." In fact, Wilson had never seen the reports.
When the Senate committee staff asked Wilson how he could have come to that conclusion, Wilson replied he may have misspoken to reporters.
-- Contrary to Wilsons claims that the Bush administration understood that it was knowingly passing along questionable information to the American public, the Senate committee found in its investigations that the CIA did not tell the White House it had its own doubts about an Iraq/Niger connection for the procuring of uranium.
Joseph Wilson has had extensive ties to the Democratic Party throughout much of his time in Washington. Wilson is an unabashed supporter and donor to the Kerry/Edwards campaign for the presidency. In 2000, he donated to Vice President Gores election, as has his wife, Valerie Plume. In the mid-eighties, Wilson worked for Gore as a congressional staffer. He has donated money to such liberal stalwarts as Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy. He has in the recent past spoken to liberal 527 groups like Win Without War, which is a part of MoveOn.org, the premiere liberal hate group that is renowned for its coarse and hate-inspired political sloganeering.
One by one, the presidents accusers, and the conspiracies they inspire, are turning out to be disproved. Former terrorist czar Richard Clarke was shown to be wanting in the credibility department, and now, so is former ambassador Joseph Wilson. It is more than chilling in my mind when I stop to think just what the acquisition of power means to the party out of it. In this case, it is the Democratic Party. It has shown that it and its supporters, like Clarke and Wilson, would willingly throw the country into political Armageddon all in hopes of winning an election.
It is unclear whether good news can travel fast in a media mired in Orwellian reporting. I suspect not, as Im sure this surprises no one interested in the truth. One would hope that the country learns of the mendacity of Joe Wilson, and his willingness to inject his political viewpoints in a time of war, all in the hopes of seeing a Democrat in the White House.
The prolific architect, Frank Lloyd Wright, said The truth is more important than the facts. I would amend his words to say, The truth is that much more important because of the facts. In Joseph Wilson, the fact of the matter is that the truth is not important, regardless of the facts.
or rather that his identity was never a secret.