lthumbsdown:skinny centered layout
- Thread starter TN
- Start date
-
- Tags
- whine du jour
lthumbsdown:
x2
345
345
It just doesn't sound gangsta when you say it.
I didn't understand what the hell was going on in that thread.
I didn't understand what the hell was going on in that thread.
1000 pixels wide isn't exactly "skinny"
I've played around with 1000 pixel formats for a while and I relly don't see any drawbacks to it. The only potential problem is room for large photos, but they just push the side out and are displayed full size anyway.
Free beer to anyone that can tell me an actual problem with the layout other than its not what you are used to
I've played around with 1000 pixel formats for a while and I relly don't see any drawbacks to it. The only potential problem is room for large photos, but they just push the side out and are displayed full size anyway.
Free beer to anyone that can tell me an actual problem with the layout other than its not what you are used to
Change is bad....mmmkay
There are two wide grey bars in my browser windows.
SCORE!
:biggrin:
SCORE!
:biggrin:
Free beer to anyone that can tell me an actual problem with the layout other than its not what you are used to
Maybe it's something artsy or something............but what's the point? just seems to be less used space and nothing more than that.
Actually, since large photos only push out that particular post, I don't mind this at all.1000 pixels wide isn't exactly "skinny"
I've played around with 1000 pixel formats for a while and I relly don't see any drawbacks to it. The only potential problem is room for large photos, but they just push the side out and are displayed full size anyway.
Free beer to anyone that can tell me an actual problem with the layout other than its not what you are used to
Previously, large photos would affect the entire page, forcing a reader to scroll sideways for every message. This makes reading a thread slower.
I rather have no limitations on page width, but since I only a 17" monitor, it is fine with me.
It displays with a scroll bar on low resolution, making it really crummy if you run 800x600Free beer to anyone that can tell me an actual problem with the layout other than its not what you are used to
This is a pretty nice layout...ads at the top and not a lot of wasted space...http://www.bikemojo.com/speak/index.php...though it will probable show up as narrow since I think he has it set that you have to go into UserCP to change to wide.1000 pixels wide isn't exactly "skinny"
I've played around with 1000 pixel formats for a while and I relly don't see any drawbacks to it. The only potential problem is room for large photos, but they just push the side out and are displayed full size anyway.
Free beer to anyone that can tell me an actual problem with the layout other than its not what you are used to
Last edited:
The giant header image is a waste of space to some degree. The empty space you see at the top of the RM forums is going to be filled with things that are in development. I was going to put the tag cloud there temporarily, but that was abused pretty heavily so it had to go.
This is a pretty nice layout...ads at the top and not a lot of wasted space...http://www.bikemojo.com/speak/index.php...though it will probable show up as narrow since I think he has it set that you have to go into UserCP to change to wide.
Mine looks the same. Non-profits are kind of like the soviet union.
I thought you were supposed to be waiting in line for your bread?