Will it put its lotion on the skin??<snip>
The skin is kind of a departure.
I don't like the skin. It seems....sterile. Not really sure how else to describe it, but I get a very "hospital" vibe. Will the new site give me MERS?So... subjective opinions?
The skin is kind of a departure. Most of the functions are more dynamic than the page-by-page clicking of vBulletin. Everything look good to you guys, for the most part?
Got it. Will look into it.If you try to upload an image that's too big, a generic error message is displayed. It'd be nice if it informed you of the actual size limit.
Rep is there (as in, it's a function of the site) but I think we will be resetting rep counts.will rep be sticking around? hitting reset on post count?
Floating AIDS bar will probably be replaced with a static SARS bar. Reasonable tradeoff?I dig it. Seems to work fast. I love the jump to first new post. I dig the larger avatards. I'm so happy there's no floating AIDS bar on the side of the page, but maybe my adblocker is blocking that travesty there too.
If the biggest complaint is that the skin is a little sterile, I guess I'll take it.I don't like the skin. It seems....sterile. Not really sure how else to describe it, but I get a very "hospital" vibe. Will the new site give me MERS?
Yep, favicon hasn't been implemented yet.Using Chrome, no RM logo on browser tab.
Seems to be the same in IE, and, I think, in Firefox.
It's called "don't maximize your browser window and drag to resize yourself" eh?Any way to make the width adjustable for those of us who have moved into the 21st century and gone with this newfangled thing called "widescreen monitors"?
...I think we will be resetting rep counts.
SARS is so 2010. How about hiney flu?Floating AIDS bar will probably be replaced with a static SARS bar. Reasonable tradeoff?
Yeah, sorry, this reminds me of how awful some websites look after seeing other websites like G+ that utilize an entire widescreen monitor. Having everything squeezed into the middle 1/3 of my screen and then huge gray bars on either side is pretty bad (and yes, very similar to how Facebook is).It's called "don't maximize your browser window and drag to resize yourself" eh?![]()
Don't worry we'll still have respect for you when your rep hammer is pitiful..........NOoooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!
Seven years of college down the drain.but I think we will be resetting rep counts.
Nope. Sorry. We're serving ad templates across multiple sites and they need guaranteed site widths.Any way to make the width adjustable for those of us who have moved into the 21st century and gone with this newfangled thing called "widescreen monitors"?
Good feedback, thanks. Forum stats are only a placeholder to make the sidebar widget appear - they won't remain. If you click your username, there's a drop down of a bunch of stuff you can edit - hitting any one of them will bring you to a page with a list of items to edit on the left.Layout feels visually untethered. I'd like more delineation between posts (a la dark time/date/post # bar on this layout).
I also want the top nav bar to go away once I scroll down, analogous to how iOS apps work.
Follow Us icons and panel at bottom are too big.
Why is there a separate Home/contact us/help bar below posts, when there's space for those things in the bottom nav bar?
Forum statistics belong on forum page, not on thread view page.
Where's the equivalent of User CP? Profile isn't it...
i planned on retiring when i get to 24.....NOoooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!
Well, the ad widths could be the same, but right now there's huge open real estate on either side of the site. There's no way to make your page width be dependent on what resolution you're running?Nope. Sorry. We're serving ad templates across multiple sites and they need guaranteed site widths.
I'm not talking about banner sizes - those are easy. It's the actual templates (overlays, sidebar ads, site takeovers, etc.) that are a problem. And like I said, there are multiple sites from Grind Media that all use the same ad templates and we need consistency. So to make a change to one site, we'd have to change all of them, setting up multiple templates to span multiple sizes, on multiple sites. It's just not in the cards right now.Well, the ad widths could be the same, but right now there's huge open real estate on either side of the site. There's no way to make your page width be dependent on what resolution you're running?
I am trying to figure out if this is a question, as indicated by the punctuation, or a statement as indicated by the words.Time limit between posts?
I moved you to the regular user group. Try it now.I still get a permissions error when I try to do anything in the new site. Looks good when I'm logged out though.
It's a statement - it happens, tried to reply to two topics within some relatively short interval, and got a popup.Time limit between posts?
Layout feels visually untethered. I'd like more delineation between posts (a la dark time/date/post # bar on this layout).
Yes, it's by design. This site also has a limitation. It might not be set appropriately - I'll look at the settings. I've set up and torn down that beta site so much that I'm not sure 100% of the options are set right now.It's a statement - it happens, tried to reply to two topics within some relatively short interval, and got a popup.
It's a question - is this by design? Is the time constant appropriate?
Seriously. Don't you have to ACTUALLY ride bikes to be part of this forumYeah, get rid of IAB!
Seriously. Don't you have to ACTUALLY ride bikes to be part of this forum![]()
Partially that, but the current version does that too with me ad blockin.Can you elaborate, woo?
I understand Toshi's point and we'll do something to address that, but your other comment doesn't seem to relate... are you talking about the fixed width of the site? Or something else?
Well, you're not logged in.Look at the difference in available navigation options at the top of the current site vs the beta.
<snip>
It just seems like in an effort to 'clean up' everything so that it works on phones, functionality is being cut.