But therein lies your answer, for a while at least, mountain bike shocks were designed with an oil bath and constant lubrication, forks and rear shocks. This stopped for forks a while back, yet there are ways to add compensating pistons and still "make it work" as a full bath. Even the older "regular" full bath can perform pretty damn well with a decent damper (RC3 Evo V2, avalanche cart, etc), as I learned when I had one, but it won't be as consistent in terrain, but miles better than something with a crappy damper. The only remaining problem if you add some sort of compensating piston is that it's still heavier than it could be, so we sacrifice reliability for weight. The new 380 DH fork seems to address all of this, so we'll see how it works. Semi-bath can work, but it might need to be more than a few CCs that can easily come out of the fork, or at least have some simple easy way of being recharged/purged.Old school Zokes are the best from a reliability standpoint, but they're the worst from a suspension performance standpoint. They're "dumb" and as such, reliable, but the market shunned them as other companies started putting SPV, CTD, RC2, AC-DC, R2D2, and a whole host of other acronyms in their forks. Now Zokes suffer the same reliability flaws, but is replacing a $30 set of seals and $5 in oil every once in a while really that bad?
Last edited: