Quantcast

So I'm a big fat jerk right?

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
I have no problem with that.... but listen to this....

Say...just say... HYPOTHETICALLY, a fellow rider crashes really hard and needs hospitalization. Said rider has no insurance, and is stranded in a foreign country. He runs up some pretty crazy hospital bills. Now again, just say, the guys friends rally around and take up donations to help him out. That's nice no?

So say now a couple months pass. All healed up, back on the bike...and now traveling to far off places. My question is, if said rider can afford to travel for extended periods of time, should said rider have accepted money for hospital bills at all? OR if now all of a sudden a finanacial situation had changed, (making travel and leisure more feasible), should said rider be attempting to repay at least some of the donations?

All hypothetical of course...Remember, I'm a big fat jerk for even wondering this.
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
Well, on the surface it might seem that way. However:

1) When he was in need, his friends helped him out. As long as he would do the same, cool.

2) As long as nobody held a gun to anyone's head while asking for donations, they were voluntary.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
The right thing is for the said rider to at least make an effort to pay back.

Not saying that the donors will want it, but the rider should at least ask.... showing his appreciation for their $'s.

If he doesn't, then the next time some donors will take a pass on helping him out. I know I would.
 

stevew

resident influencer
Sep 21, 2001
41,044
9,983
I would think the simple twit would be looking into insuring himself before going on another trip.
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,149
1,250
NC
I think "said rider" should have made an effort to pay back hospital bills regardless of whether or not he could afford to travel... and doubly so since he can.

If my friends all took up a collection to bail me out of financial trouble, I would make a sincere effort to try to reimburse them. Which would, of course, involve postponing some plans that would eat up the reimbursement money.

I don't think it makes him a bad person, but it does make him inconsiderate.
 

douglas

Chocolate Milk Doug
May 15, 2002
9,887
6
Shut up and Ride
MMike said:
I have no problem with that.... but listen to this....

Say...just say... HYPOTHETICALLY, a fellow rider crashes really hard and needs hospitalization. Said rider has no insurance, and is stranded in a foreign country. He runs up some pretty crazy hospital bills. Now again, just say, the guys friends rally around and take up donations to help him out. That's nice no?

So say now a couple months pass. All healed up, back on the bike...and now traveling to far off places. My question is, if said rider can afford to travel for extended periods of time, should said rider have accepted money for hospital bills at all? OR if now all of a sudden a finanacial situation had changed, (making travel and leisure more feasible), should said rider be attempting to repay at least some of the donations?

All hypothetical of course...Remember, I'm a big fat jerk for even wondering this.

did he ask for money? if so, did he cry poor?

does he know have insurance?
 

stevew

resident influencer
Sep 21, 2001
41,044
9,983
Echo said:
At least he didn't use the charity given to him to buy 40's and drink them in front of the liquor store.
Did he survive a hurricane to?
 

Cooter Brown

Turbo Monkey
May 30, 2002
1,453
0
Snow Hall, tweakin on math
No, I think the donations were just that, a bunch of friends that got together to help a brother out. When they gave, they weren't expecting anything back, like it was a loan or something. They're probably jazzed that he's just back on a bike and hanging out on the trails once again with them.

just my $.02
 

Brian HCM#1

MMMMMMMMM BEER!!!!!!!!!!
Sep 7, 2001
32,177
377
Bay Area, California
Cooter Brown said:
No, I think the donations were just that, a bunch of friends that got together to help a brother out. When they gave, they weren't expecting anything back, like it was a loan or something. They're probably jazzed that he's just back on a bike and hanging out on the trails once again with them.

just my $.02
I think the point is, if you DIDN'T have the funds to cover your medical expenses, and your Buddy's bailed you out, you have know business jetting off again so soon after crying I'm broke.
 

laura

DH_Laura
Jul 16, 2002
6,259
15
Glitter Gulch
i don't know what i think about that. i know i would pay everyone back as soon as i could, but i'm just like that when it comes to money.

i have a similar situation though. our anthropology dept here has taken in a grad student from new orleans. he lost a lot in the storm. i gave him one of my old bikes to get around with. but then he started hitting me up to get him a hook up with some weed. well our dept. is having a fund raiser for him, to help him out. but i'm not giving any money. because i don't want him to buy weed with my money. maybe i'm a bitch. i shouldn't judge how people want to spend their money, but i'm not contributing.
 

Snacks

Turbo Monkey
Feb 20, 2003
3,523
0
GO! SEAHAWKS!
Echo said:
Well, on the surface it might seem that way. However:

1) When he was in need, his friends helped him out. As long as he would do the same, cool.

2) As long as nobody held a gun to anyone's head while asking for donations, they were voluntary.

Word.

MMike, why do you even care so much?:rolleyes:
 

Cooter Brown

Turbo Monkey
May 30, 2002
1,453
0
Snow Hall, tweakin on math
Brian HCM#1 said:
I think the point is, if you DIDN'T have the funds to cover your medical expenses, and your Buddy's bailed you out, you have know business jetting off again so soon after crying I'm broke.

I can see your view if he was in fact asking for it. But if the friends just got together and threw in a little just to help the cause because that's what friends do, then I think all is good.

Kind of depends on the circumstances it was given under.
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
Cooter Brown said:
I can see your view if he was in fact asking for it. But if the friends just got together and threw in a little just to help the cause because that's what friends do, then I think all is good.

Kind of depends on the circumstances it was given under.

To be fair, I don't think it was requested (hypothetically). The guy (hypothetically) rides for someone. The hypothetical sponsor I believe was the one hypothetically asking for hypothetical donations. Visa and Paypal I believe were hypothetically accepted.


If it were me, ...well A) I would have insurance....but I'm not sure I would be able to accept several thousand dollars like that... But if I really had no choice I know I would want to pay it back no matter what. ...hypothetically.
 

blt2ride

Turbo Monkey
May 25, 2005
2,332
0
Chatsworth
MMike said:
I have no problem with that.... but listen to this....

Say...just say... HYPOTHETICALLY, a fellow rider crashes really hard and needs hospitalization. Said rider has no insurance, and is stranded in a foreign country. He runs up some pretty crazy hospital bills. Now again, just say, the guys friends rally around and take up donations to help him out. That's nice no?

So say now a couple months pass. All healed up, back on the bike...and now traveling to far off places. My question is, if said rider can afford to travel for extended periods of time, should said rider have accepted money for hospital bills at all? OR if now all of a sudden a finanacial situation had changed, (making travel and leisure more feasible), should said rider be attempting to repay at least some of the donations?

All hypothetical of course...Remember, I'm a big fat jerk for even wondering this.
Of course he should pay his friends back; that goes without saying. However, there seems to be a bigger problem here--what happens if he gets hurt again? Hypothetically, this guy seems very self-centered to me...
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
So how long should the dude be required to sit around doing nothing until it's ok for him to start living his life again? Is there an instruction manual for this? I mean think of it this way:

Dude racks up 10 grand in medical bills.

Homies do a major solid and come up with 5 grand in donations.

Dude pays the other 5 grand out of pocket. Still costs him everything he has.

So your contention is he's not allowed to have any fun until he comes up with 5 grand to individually pay 500 people 10 bucks each?
 

Brian HCM#1

MMMMMMMMM BEER!!!!!!!!!!
Sep 7, 2001
32,177
377
Bay Area, California
Echo said:
So your contention is he's not allowed to have any fun until he comes up with 5 grand to individually pay 500 people 10 bucks each?
I guess it would depend on how long it has been between the hospital & his next vacation. If he jetted out on another trip within a few months, that isn't right.
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
Echo said:
So how long should the dude be required to sit around doing nothing until it's ok for him to start living his life again? Is there an instruction manual for this? I mean think of it this way:

Dude racks up 10 grand in medical bills.

Homies do a major solid and come up with 5 grand in donations.

Dude pays the other 5 grand out of pocket. Still costs him everything he has.

So your contention is he's not allowed to have any fun until he comes up with 5 grand to individually pay 500 people 10 bucks each?
If it had been hypothetically, barely 12 weeks since the hospital episode, and now the hypothetical person was on a trip riding in Asia (let's say)....after having done EXTREMELY well racing the Mammoth National...(whenever that was).. would that affect your opinion?
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
Brian HCM#1 said:
I guess it would depend on how long it has been between the hospital & his next vacation. If he jetted out on another trip within a few months, that isn't right.
Sounds like the dude is (hypothetically) sponsored. So if he's healthy and his sponsors want him to do an event, he kinda has to do it, no? Or do you think he should risk losing his career while he saves up 5 grand to give 500 people 10 bucks each?
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
Echo said:
Sounds like the dude is (hypothetically) sponsored. So if he's healthy and his sponsors want him to do an event, he kinda has to do it, no? Or do you think he should risk losing his career while he saves up 5 grand to give 500 people 10 bucks each?
Hypothetically, it ain't an event...

On a side note, I can now type the word "hypothetically" really fast!
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
MMike said:
If it had been hypothetically, barely 12 weeks since the hospital episode, and now the hypothetical person was on a trip riding in Asia (let's say)....after having done EXTREMELY well racing the Mammoth National...(whenever that was).. would that affect your opinion?
Well since you are giving out small bits of additional information whenever you need to in order to support your opinion, it makes it quite difficult to continue this discussion :p
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
55,772
21,779
Sleazattle
MMike is a big fat jerk. But he does ask the questions that need to be asked but most are afraid too.

I would attempt to pay my friends back before spending money on non essential items. I guess it all depends on how the money was raised. If it was people getting together for a fundraiser, random $20donation type things it would be different. But if buddy-A and buddy-B shelled out serious cash I'd make paying them back a priority.
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
Westy said:
I guess it all depends on how the money was raised. If it was people getting together for a fundraiser, random $20donation type things it would be different. But if buddy-A and buddy-B shelled out serious cash I'd make paying them back a priority.
I think that's what I was trying to say :think:
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
Echo said:
Well since you are giving out small bits of additional information whenever you need to in order to support your opinion, it makes it quite difficult to continue this discussion :p

....AND he's a pedophile...and he used to money to fund a child pornography ring



(ok maybe not)
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
Look at it this way. A few years ago, RhinoFromWA jacked himself up bigtime with no insurance. Lots of monkeys threw him a few bones and Freak stepped up bigtime with the raffle. So if Rhino won the lottery, would I expect my $10 back? Hell no. Would Freak expect financial compensation for his efforts? Probably not. Would Rhino hook some people up who helped him out? Most likely. Do I have a point? Nah :D
 

MMike

A fowl peckerwood.
Sep 5, 2001
18,207
105
just sittin' here drinkin' scotch
Echo said:
Look at it this way. A few years ago, RhinoFromWA jacked himself up bigtime with no insurance. Lots of monkeys threw him a few bones and Freak stepped up bigtime with the raffle. So if Rhino won the lottery, would I expect my $10 back? Hell no. Would Freak expect financial compensation for his efforts? Probably not. Would Rhino hook some people up who helped him out? Most likely. Do I have a point? Nah :D
That's fine, and Rhino is a great guy. He laughs at my jokes, so that's enough for me....he also didn't go jetting off right away either...

I guess what it boils down to is the short time between accepting donations and then going off somewhere.

I'd better hope I never need a ridemonkey raffle to help me out, eh? I think donations would be a little scarce......especially from the PNW crowd....(hypothetically)
 
Personally....

I don't think it's an issue of payback. The donations were given in the name of 'charity'. He was in need, his freinds stepped up.

His travel is irrelevent, regardless of the reason.

The real issue for me is....if he is now spending his money on travel and racing in lue (sp?) of health insurance...he's selfish, and didn't learn a damn thing from the generoristy of his freinds. He's back out there putting himself in the same position, expecting his freinds to bail him out again if something happens.
 

OGRipper

back alley ripper
Feb 3, 2004
10,720
1,221
NORCAL is the hizzle
Is he paying his own travel expenses or are they being paid by his sponsor(s)?

If he plead poverty and asked for help, he should at least offer to pay back his close friends who ponied up, especially those who don't have a lot of cash to throw around. In that situation most people would not take it back anyway, but you would think the dude would put the $$ towards insurance for when he gets hurt again.

If he didn't really need or ask for the help he should not have accepted it in the first place.

And please, spare us any more of the "hypothetical" charade...