Fret not, Thomson's got you covered:damnit i was loving this guessing game...
alright im out
edit: its still gunu be a bong
Fret not, Thomson's got you covered:damnit i was loving this guessing game...
alright im out
edit: its still gunu be a bong
As was already mentioned, so people can have matching cockpits.Seems rather odd to me. Would that not increase cost / marketing / support etc?
Why would you have two identical competing products in the market and bring them out at the same time?
Yea I get that Fox has DOSS and all, but this is a bit different.
I was not aware that roadies now use droppers, too.As was already mentioned, so people can have matching cockpits.
The article mentioned something about the cable being easily detachable.... so not really.So is this any different than whats already on the market? I don't pay attention to this stuff much.
So this is the proof of my double oddness (or is it oddity?) - trail bike cockpit Renthal stem and Enve bar, road bike cockpit S-Works stem and PRO barI was not aware that roadies now use droppers, too.
I don't know, I suck at matching parts.Narrow browsing at work, so skipped a few posts
Makes sense I guess, but that's purely from a product branding perspective. Advertising costs and so goes up... and do people really care that much about absolutely having matched cockpits? I get bar and stem, but even post?
I saw the same thing on bikerumor. 9point8 internals in a blingbrand chassis. I like easton and raceface. I've got the same Havoc carbon bars and stem on both my DH bike and trail bike, and the 6six cranks on the trail bike, but I would rather throw my money at the little guy, especially if he charges me $100 less.Looks like a dropper post with licensed internals from 9point8 and they are charging $100 more for it. To me this sounds like a bad call. I like how the 9point8 works and all, but charging more for something you put little to no R&D into does not make sense.
-Brett
Makes sense I guess, but that's purely from a product branding perspective. Advertising costs and so goes up... and do people really care that much about absolutely having matched cockpits? I get bar and stem, but even post?
you have to have a little bit of slack in the cable for it to work properly. Not enough, and it is inconsistent in staying where you set it. The 9point8 instructions say 1 mm, but I got the best results with about an 1/8" instead. I'm leaning towards this rather than a 1st run production problem like the PB mentioned.OEMs, from what I gleaned from the PB blurb on the post, they intend to sell full matching "kits". Makes sense, Fox dominates the OEM suspension market, or at least did, they seem to be losing ground to SRAM, I'm sure they'll be offering package deals on fork, shock, stem, bars, crank, wheelset, dropper post and saddle.
OEM also helps explain the price. "Sir, that bike over at shop XYZ is certainly a bit cheaper than this one, but you have to keep in mind the parts on this fine steed, that's a $500 seatpost for christsake!" It will probably cost the bike manufacturer less than a KS or Reverb, probably not much more than what Giant spends to stick their house branded post on a bike, but it adds perceived value.
Also based on the PB preview, it doesn't work, so there's that....
the bigger joke is that i still have a functioning Crank Bros Joplin dropper post.What a joke.
They intentionally gave the only working units to you and Charlie Sponsel in order to keep the bad rep below bearable limits.the bigger joke is that i still have a functioning Crank Bros Joplin dropper post.
they must have used some serious voodoo then, because i bought mine used no lessThey intentionally gave the only working units to you and Charlie Sponsel in order to keep the bad rep below bearable limits.
Voodooeconomics™they must have used some serious voodoo then, because i bought mine used no less