lol beat me to it, ahahaCool story bro ^^
Its a carbon Demo !
Lazy big-S engineers. Must be the trend these days with the trek taking just about the exact same design of the session and dipping it into a carbon mold. Carbon for the sake of carbon-ness!
Guess they have to have something for the 2013 Demogive them some time to get familiar with the material. They know the frame shape works...once they understand the various effects of the carbon material, and what better way than in an already understoof frame shape, Im sure we will see more radical design changes. Plus, theres always next years frames to sell us
Spec has been building Carbon bikes for a while now, they should know how the material works and how it feels in various tube profiles.give them some time to get familiar with the material. They know the frame shape works...once they understand the various effects of the carbon material, and what better way than in an already understoof frame shape, Im sure we will see more radical design changes. Plus, theres always next years frames to sell us
I hope soNow a Glory carbon and then the biggest three companies have carbon DH rigs
.....Hey lets all be like Trek I mean Santa Cruz I mean GT I really meant Lahar...I really meant BCD and I'm sure others before...
Ya, It'd be better if they took a proven design, chucked it out the window, took a new material, new production techniques and completely redesigned the product, and took a big risk with it not working. Incremental improvements are only for legitimate, experienced engineer. Stupid risks and changes leading to spectacular failures of products are what the bike industry is made of.Lazy big-S engineers. Must be the trend these days with the trek taking just about the exact same design of the session and dipping it into a carbon mold. Carbon for the sake of carbon-ness!
I think you just answered your own question here... the alu version was designed and assumed the form it took for a reason... I can relate to your passion for new, creative, aesthetically pleasing designs, but just because a company decides to make a new carbon version of an existing alu platform doesn't necessarily mean that new design should look radically different for the sake of appearances.Haha. It's a normal Demo 8, in CARBON. LITERALLY. It looks like they made it carbon just for the sake of making it carbon. Are they just lazy or by coincedence the aluminum front triangle design just so happens to also be optimal for carbon?
I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but there is MUCH more going on with frame tubing than just diameter. One of the keys to structural rigidity is not just diameter but also wall thickness. This is true for either carbon or alu applications. In a DH bike design, you want the DT to be as large and robust as possible - dw is a strong proponent of this ideology and it makes sense. However, SC chose to go with a smaller carbon tube set. In order to accomplish this, the wall thickness of the DT for example is incredibly thick.That big downtube, in carbon, looks scary. Didn't they make the tubes on the V10c smaller for a good reason?
I will actually break my silence on this...I interviewed for a helmet developer position up at Specialized a few months ago (they actually flew me up there which was pretty cool..nice people) and there were McLaren F1 engineers there while I was interviewing and I was told that's what they were working on. With McLaren involved, I wouldn't have any worries with strength...they're a serious bunch.I think you just answered your own question here... the alu version was designed and assumed the form it took for a reason... I can relate to your passion for new, creative, aesthetically pleasing designs, but just because a company decides to make a new carbon version of an existing alu platform doesn't necessarily mean that new design should look radically different for the sake of appearances.
I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but there is MUCH more going on with frame tubing than just diameter. One of the keys to structural rigidity is not just diameter but also wall thickness. This is true for either carbon or alu applications. In a DH bike design, you want the DT to be as large and robust as possible - dw is a strong proponent of this ideology and it makes sense. However, SC chose to go with a smaller carbon tube set. In order to accomplish this, the wall thickness of the DT for example is incredibly thick.
Carbon is a very interesting media to work with b/c the designer has the freedom to manipulate it in a multitude of ways. If you look at GT's approach to the Fury, it would seem like an alu monocoque was the design model it was based on. Similarly, Cro-Mo tubing resembles the strategy SC employed.
I have NO idea what the DT wall thickness is on the new Demo, but rest assured Spesh's partnership with McLaren will produce more than reasonable results.
...yeah, but what really matters - did you get a job?...I interviewed for a helmet developer position up at Specialized a few months ago (.
unfortunately no the interview went awesome but I think they went with a local candidate as they would have had to pay for my moving expenses and the penalty on my lease....yeah, but what really matters - did you get a job?
They hired away most of the Bell sports engineers actually....yeah, but what really matters - did you get a job?
Specialized R&D ride everything. Last year during Crankworx they had a Revolt, Glory, 88 and a few more that I've forgot. Pounding out the laps, changing shocks etc.
Speci and McLaren have already workeded togehther on the new S-works Tarmarc Road Bike, which was seen at this years Tour the France.......I will actually break my silence on this...I interviewed for a helmet developer position up at Specialized a few months ago (they actually flew me up there which was pretty cool..nice people) and there were McLaren F1 engineers there while I was interviewing and I was told that's what they were working on. With McLaren involved, I wouldn't have any worries with strength...they're a serious bunch.
If they ride so many bikes why haven't they realized by now that the Demo doesn't need two chainstays?Specialized R&D ride everything. Last year during Crankworx they had a Revolt, Glory, 88 and a few more that I've forgot. Pounding out the laps, changing shocks etc.
I think it's fair to say they know what's up.
Yup, they had a whole fleet of high end rentals going on this week trying them all out, seeing what's what. They had just about the entire marketing and engineering program up there. From FSR frames, to tires.Specialized R&D ride everything. Last year during Crankworx they had a Revolt, Glory, 88 and a few more that I've forgot. Pounding out the laps, changing shocks etc.
I think it's fair to say they know what's up.
Do you ever actually think or do you simply **** out of your mouth?marketing.Looks deece.