Quantcast

stance good or bad

is the stance any good

  • good forks

    Votes: 11 40.7%
  • bad forks

    Votes: 6 22.2%
  • not sure

    Votes: 10 37.0%

  • Total voters
    27

TheMontashu

Pourly Tatteued Jeu
Mar 15, 2004
5,549
0
I'm homeless
The Kadvang said:
was it necessary to start a new thread for this, with the two available for you to post your comments in

ghettogt said no, jewy
well tell ghetto that he needs to fix his junk(truk) and his junk(bike)
 

mobius

Turbo Monkey
Jan 25, 2003
2,158
0
Around DC
Mine bottoms with me pushing on it. im 150lbs.
my friend sean (castle) his bottoms like no other and it has oil all over the thing and he's used it twice.
 

Sir_Crackien

Turbo Monkey
Feb 7, 2004
2,051
0
alex. va. usa.
i have a kingpin. i have had a problem with the air assist, but if you call them up they have a fix for the problem and they will send you new(and improved) seals for free. one thing you have to remember that anything new is going to have teething problems. as for function that fork feels great and is very controlled.
 

auntesther

Monkey
Oct 15, 2001
293
0
Boston, MA
I have a static 100mm and has worked fir so far. holds air, air makes a noticeable difference, seals havent popped out. A little weeping on the stanchions but nothing bad. with 20 psi in it, it never comes close to bottoming on my 190+ lb carcass
 

TheMontashu

Pourly Tatteued Jeu
Mar 15, 2004
5,549
0
I'm homeless
auntesther said:
I have a static 100mm and has worked fir so far. holds air, air makes a noticeable difference, seals havent popped out. A little weeping on the stanchions but nothing bad. with 20 psi in it, it never comes close to bottoming on my 190+ lb carcass
you want it to bottom jest not off evory hit
 

The Kadvang

I rule
Apr 13, 2004
3,499
0
six five oh
scurban said:
So far my 80mm static has worked fine.
Thats what I wanna hear. And jewy, people running these 3-4 inch forks are generally using them to ride street, and pumpin em up super stiff for that, so they may not bottom at all.
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,205
1,393
NC
Curb Hucker said:
no you want it to use all of its travel not, bottom out
And how, exactly, do you propose to go about using all of your travel without bottoming out?

I mean, is bottoming out not the very definition of "using all of your travel"? With anything less than bottoming, NOT using all of it?

No, you don't want it to bottom out really hard, but if you're bottoming hard, I almost guarantee you're going to be bottoming a lot.
 

auntesther

Monkey
Oct 15, 2001
293
0
Boston, MA
TheMontashu said:
you want it to bottom jest not off evory hit
actually I dont..its on a park jump bike and I would rather have used an 80mm version but to slacken the HA out a bit, I use a 100mm version...I dont really want 100mm of travel so the 3" or so that I get is fine by me. its stiff, doesnt move alot and takes the edge of landings. just what I want
 

bballboy388

Monkey
Dec 4, 2004
812
0
my friend has the blunt it came on his chase 2 and that bottoms out like no other way to much expecially for a park bike
 

Curb Hucker

I am an idiot
Feb 4, 2004
3,661
0
Sleeping in my Kenworth
Ive always used the term bottom out when you feel a nice big clunk, because your fork is poorly tuned for what you are doing. You can go through all of your travel and never feel the clunk or harsh bottom out if you have a properly set up fork.
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,205
1,393
NC
bballboy388 said:
my friend has the blunt it came on his chase 2 and that bottoms out like no other way to much expecially for a park bike
Incorrect spring weight.

Air tuning is no substitute for a correct spring rate.
 

TankerX

Monkey
Aug 20, 2003
729
0
The best place Fo Sho
My opinion, i hate sherman breakouts, flicks or whatever u call them b/c it's not open bath so then u have to get the correct spring rate which sucks. I had my share of owning a breakout and a flick, always had to get a new spring. Marzocchi's mainly needs heavier oil and which saves u time and money.
 

Bicyclist

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2004
10,152
2
SB
FOR THE MONEY it SEEMS like a decent fork... but I will only ride a Zoke or maby a Fox due to reliability.
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,205
1,393
NC
TankerX said:
My opinion, i hate sherman breakouts, flicks or whatever u call them b/c it's not open bath so then u have to get the correct spring rate which sucks. I had my share of owning a breakout and a flick, always had to get a new spring. Marzocchi's mainly needs heavier oil and which saves u time and money.
:rolleyes:

Oil levels and weight is a lousy way of substituting for a good spring rate. All forks and shocks will perform sub-par with an incorrect spring weight, no matter what "band-aid" technique you use to try and compensate.

That's just a poor excuse. I'm not pro-Marz or pro-Manitou, I'll just use what suits my needs best, but saying, "Manitou forks suck because you need the correct spring rate" is just sad...
 

HRDTLBRO

Turbo Monkey
Feb 4, 2004
1,161
0
Apt. 421
binary visions said:
:rolleyes:

Oil levels and weight is a lousy way of substituting for a good spring rate. All forks and shocks will perform sub-par with an incorrect spring weight, no matter what "band-aid" technique you use to try and compensate.

That's just a poor excuse. I'm not pro-Marz or pro-Manitou, I'll just use what suits my needs best, but saying, "Manitou forks suck because you need the correct spring rate" is just sad...
I agree that incorrect spring weight will lead to bad performance, but the ability to change oil height is a fine tuning method, and not a band-aid. Granted, it very well could be when someone dumps too much of a heavy weight oil in a fork with a low spring weight. Used correctly though, i'd say oil height and weight can help provide optimal performance. This would first require the correct springs, as you stated, though. :thumb:
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,205
1,393
NC
HRDTLBRO said:
the ability to change oil height is a fine tuning method<snip>
Used correctly though, i'd say oil height and weight can help provide optimal performance. <snip>
Undoubtedly! The method of adding oil or increasing weight is a great way to fine tune your fork, and it's a very nice side-effect (or designed in? Who knows...) of the open bath design.

In this particular case, though, statements like:
TankerX said:
b/c it's not open bath so then u have to get the correct spring rate which sucks
...drive me up the wall. If you're going to dislike a product, dislike it based on the product's merits or issues, not based on whether or not you're too damn lazy to buy the correct spring for your fork :rolleyes:

Ahh well, can't correct the entire world's ignorance, right?
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,520
11,009
AK
binary visions said:
Oil levels and weight is a lousy way of substituting for a good spring rate
And oversprung forks are a lousy way of substituting for progressiveness. :rolleyes:
 

binary visions

The voice of reason
Jun 13, 2002
22,205
1,393
NC
Jm_ said:
And oversprung forks are a lousy way of substituting for progressiveness. :rolleyes:
Lord, Jm, you make some stupid comments.

We're not talking about fork function, we're not talking about preferences, I simply said that you should not substitute band-aid fixes for actually going out and having a properly sprung fork. That applies to any fork on the market.

Snide comments only serve to damage your own credibility; you make them too often and it becomes impossible to distinguish between your actual helpful information and your blind brand hatred.

:rolleyes: right back at you.
 

Curb Hucker

I am an idiot
Feb 4, 2004
3,661
0
Sleeping in my Kenworth
binary visions said:
Lord, Jm, you make some stupid comments.

Snide comments only serve to damage your own credibility; you make them too often and it becomes impossible to distinguish between your actual helpful information and your blind brand hatred.

:rolleyes: right back at you.
damn, you might as well have bitch slapped him :oink: