no, sorry. Chris King hubs cannot be used with anything but Marwi Ti flat-bladed spokes and carbon fiber rims.are Chris King ISO hubs compatalbe with ZTR flow rims with dt swiss champion spokes?
I am positive, Santa Cruz has been specing the wtb super duty wheelset on the VP free since it came out in 2004, with that hub. I say it's negligible because there is limit to how light things can be before they are too light. I say it isn't significant because, (a) you couldn't remove 20% from every bike part and keep anywhere near the necessary strength and (b) you should be thinking of it as 60g off of the rear unsprung weight which is 4500+ grams for the wheel, triangle, cass, der, brake. In that case it's closer to 1.3% which is insignificant. Rotational wise it is completely insignificant. Nothing against you personally, but that part is just too light for it's application.You sure about that? I feel a weenie like myself would have known about it if that were true.... maybe I'm wrong though! And it's not a negligible amount, it's 60g, which is pretty significant. Hope is 295, AC is 236, roughly 20% lighter. If you took a 36lb DH bike and made every component 20% lighter you'd be left with a 29lb DH bike, so that's definitely not a negligible amount, IMHO.
Anyway, I've still only had mine a month or two, but no issues yet, I'll make sure you guys are the first to know if it dies
how could you forget the purple anodised aluminium nipples?no, sorry. Chris King hubs cannot be used with anything but Marwi Ti flat-bladed spokes and carbon fiber rims.
of course! thanks for that. how careless, I forgot about nipples. don't the nipples have to be lubricated with the urine from a puma?how could you forget the purple anodised aluminium nipples?
Go tell i9 that 60g of rotational weight is insignificant. I have a feeling you may get a lecture.I am positive, Santa Cruz has been specing the wtb super duty wheelset on the VP free since it came out in 2004, with that hub. I say it's negligible because there is limit to how light things can be before they are too light. I say it isn't significant because, (a) you couldn't remove 20% from every bike part and keep anywhere near the necessary strength and (b) you should be thinking of it as 60g off of the rear unsprung weight which is 4500+ grams for the wheel, triangle, cass, der, brake. In that case it's closer to 1.3% which is insignificant. Rotational wise it is completely insignificant. Nothing against you personally, but that part is just too light for it's application.
Maybe you couldn't take 20% from most of the parts you think of as you already use them but nevermind. I don't think you see the point. The little weight gains are what really makes a differance between a solid 37lb build and a 41-44lb build. I've seen many bikes with the big parts quite light that ended quite heavy anyway and the owners had no clue how to lose the weight. You loose by that 60g+ xg+yg on small parts. I was able to ditch around 300-400g of my bike with no significant gear changes.I am positive, Santa Cruz has been specing the wtb super duty wheelset on the VP free since it came out in 2004, with that hub. I say it's negligible because there is limit to how light things can be before they are too light. I say it isn't significant because, (a) you couldn't remove 20% from every bike part and keep anywhere near the necessary strength and (b) you should be thinking of it as 60g off of the rear unsprung weight which is 4500+ grams for the wheel, triangle, cass, der, brake. In that case it's closer to 1.3% which is insignificant. Rotational wise it is completely insignificant. Nothing against you personally, but that part is just too light for it's application.
It's hardly rotational weight. Look at the center of mass of portions of the hub(assume it's not circular, so you can have a lever arm), even if you dissect the hub the only part of it which would make even the slightest difference in acceleration by being lighter is the flanges and outer portion of the cassette body, everything else is so close to the center it becomes insignificant. You would benefit 10x as much with a lighter cassette in terms of rotational weight. the difference is about the same as replacing a nipple or two with alloy nipples instead of brass.Go tell i9 that 60g of rotational weight is insignificant. I have a feeling you may get a lecture.
A 29lb DH bike does sound pretty scary based on my experience tho!! (Mine's 46/overbuilt - bet then Im 245 and 'overbuilt'!)
Take a look at my build(37.4 w/steel spring and 09 boxxer team), I do understand the point. What I'm trying to say is 65g off a part which 290 is already light for, is too much. Take a look at the bearings in the AC and WTB's, they are tiny and don't last for sh1t and the hub engagement system is terrible. The reason AC's aren't more popular is because they are over priced for a substandard part which won't last. instead of 65 on the hub, save yourself 40-50 with an X9sl or something.Maybe you couldn't take 20% from most of the parts you think of as you already use them but nevermind. I don't think you see the point. The little weight gains are what really makes a differance between a solid 37lb build and a 41-44lb build. I've seen many bikes with the big parts quite light that ended quite heavy anyway and the owners had no clue how to lose the weight. You loose by that 60g+ xg+yg on small parts. I was able to ditch around 300-400g of my bike with no significant gear changes.
What tires have You been using? Any sealant? What pressure?
Well our team riders just received their DH whelsets for 2009 and these have to be some of the lightest wheels I have seen for DH.
Specs are Stan's ZTR Flow UST rims, Hope Pro 2 Hubs laced with double butted spokes. Weights include presta vavle and rim strips.
Front- 850 grams Rear-975 grams
We tested these rims late in the season last year and were impressed enough to go ahead and race on them this season.
Transcend Magazine DH Team
Tell me more, what don't I know?altho the recommended spoke tension is off putting at first
Using dual-ply (non-UST) maxxis, set up tubeless with the stans rimstrip. Rimstrip works really well, tyre pretty much becomes one with it - never burped any air, and not surprised, took me quite a while to peel the tyre off even after I'd let all the air out! New tyres mounted pretty easily using a bit of soapy water (VERY tight, I wouldn't recommend trying it dry!), and inflated much more easily than same tyres on 823s, due to the tighter fit.
Had no problems with the AC hubs I'm running either. I've had these wheels all season now, have done 15+ DH races, most on these wheels. I ran them at Vigo, but decided to run the burlier 823s at Fort William. They have their limit I'm sure, at the end of the day it's a light rim, use it wisely!
Your weight seems correct.the weighing scale i used must have been a bit whack since mine turned out lighter than those I9s posted further up. 850g front, 980g rear.
pro2, 20mm front, 150 rear.
dt competition
dt brass nipples
Are you lubing the nipple heads??i know this is a really subjective question, but what kind or spoke tension are you guys running? mine feel quite soft in the rear even though i am close to rounding off brass nipples even with a four sided spoke wrench. maybe due to the rim not having eyelets?
Yep.Your weight seems correct.
The I9 front hub and spokes are SUPER LIGHT (Lighter than Hope hubs and butted with al nipple).
The rear I9 hub is heavier than the hope hub by 50 grams or so.
Tell me more, what don't I know?
Yes, I agree.i did notice when i was truing them, the nipples aren't in line with the spokes. probably because the hole is quite tight, and forces the spoke to bend slightly just after the nipple. made using a four sided spoke wrench a bitch!