Quit taking my explanations as "MY" argument. I understand fully (or as much as the next guy who has half paid attention) how useful stemcell research can/could be. Im all for it. Im just saying that it's not consistent with his "moral" platform and there's no way to win.
The IVF argument isnt necessarily a slam dunk becuase you have to examin who you're talking to, and what they're more concerned with is purpose than practicality. Or rather, that "creating" babies is different than experimenting on them.
Seeing as how this is the first bill that Bush has vetoed, does that mean that he did flip-flop every other time he threatened a veto and didn't follow through?
Yes, 22, but some of those are basically useless. I thought I read somewhere that there were really only 11 that were still useful, but I can't back that up.
Actually, N8, I can back that up now. All the 22 cells lines grown on mouse feeder cells, which makes them useless for many experiments.
Also, on pg. 191 of Chris Mooney's book, he reports that during an interview with Evan Snyder, the director of the Burnham Stem Cell Institute, that Snyder says that only 6 or 7 of the 22 lines are still considered useful to researchers.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.