OK... after further investigation... definitely cute, but not hot. And yes, I realize the difference is probably lost on most of you.
whats lost? ones individual opinion on whats hot and whats cute?jacksonpt said:And yes, I realize the difference is probably lost on most of you.
lmao.biggins said:maybe even move it around a little...just for her pleasure though.
more that there is a difference between being hot and being cute/pretty/beautiful.biggins said:whats lost? ones individual opinion on whats hot and whats cute?
she's a TV anchor fer krissakes.....show me one w/o gobs of face goo on...johnbryanpeters said:Giesha. Give her a bath, then we can judge.
show me five jackson-appointed 'hotter' women.jacksonpt said:OK... after further investigation... definitely cute, but not hot. And yes, I realize the difference is probably lost on most of you.
Oh jeez, we are in the presence of an expert in the field.jacksonpt said:OK... after further investigation... definitely cute, but not hot. And yes, I realize the difference is probably lost on most of you.
jacksonpt said:OK... after further investigation... definitely cute, but not hot. And yes, I realize the difference is probably lost on most of you.
maybe so but claiming that one is lost becaused their own personal ideas of whats hot and what cute does not compare to your ideas of the same subject is a little off.jacksonpt said:more that there is a difference between being hot and being cute/pretty/beautiful.
My point had nothing to do with what I find hot or pretty or whatever - my point was simply that there is a difference between the two, that someone can be hot without being pretty, and pretty without being hot.biggins said:maybe so but claiming that one is lost becaused their own personal ideas of whats hot and what cute does not compare to your ideas of the same subject is a little off.
BWAHAHAAAAnarlus said:meh...she's about a 4 on the frenchie scale (10 being the newscaster).
Freudian slip?narlus said:she's a TV anchor fer krissakes.....show me one w/o gobs of face goo on...
ok, maybe that was a poor choice of words.
clearly she has a lousy sense of style when it comes to award shows, but go watch The Italian Job.narlus said:
H8R is right: you are high.
jacksonpt said:Pretty, but not hot:
Ashely Judd
Maria Bello
Both hot and pretty
Charlize Theron
Jessica Alba
Hot, but not pretty
Angelina Jolie
see - seems as though the difference is lost on you.BurlyShirley said:Dude, your stupid definitions only have meaning to you. All those women (minus ashley judd) are hot.
No. The word's hot, sexy, pretty, whatever...they're all just subjective, and for the most part...other than "cute" can be used interchangably. Not that they have the EXACT same meaning, but if a chick can be described as ONE of those, usually two or three others willy apply as well. Except maybe to YOU. And of course, your last name isnt Webster or Hacker, so you arent the decider of such things...now are you?jacksonpt said:see - seems as though the difference is lost on you.
I have no desire to bang Maria Bello (especially after seing A History of Violence *shudder* - someone get that girl a razor), but she is a beautiful woman. Jessica Alba, on the other hand... well, I'd sell my soul to the devil.
did you take the on-line, non-ivy version?Jeremy R said:Jessica Alba does not count.
If you do not find her smoking hot, you clearly bat for the other team,
The ole Rump Rangers.
There is a difference between cute/beautiful and hot.
But the lucky few are both. Alba and the Frenchy here are in the "lucky few."
lol... very true about Alba.Jeremy R said:Jessica Alba does not count.
If you do not find her smoking hot, you clearly bat for the other team,
The ole Rump Rangers.
There is a difference between cute/beautiful and hot.
But the lucky few are both. Alba and the Frenchy here are in the "lucky few."
Jeremy R said:There is a difference between cute/beautiful and hot.
But the lucky few are both. Alba and the Frenchy here are in the "lucky few."
I don't think it was a bad choice of words. It was a pretty good description. It's easy to get to responding to the packaging, even if empty...narlus said:she's a TV anchor fer krissakes.....show me one w/o gobs of face goo on...
ok, maybe that was a poor choice of words.
Community College.narlus said:did you take the on-line, non-ivy version?
Fixed it.H8R said:What the hell is going on in this thread?? You're splitting hairs here folks.
As far as men go it should only ever boil down to three things:
Yes - I'd bang her but I'd regret it
Yes - I'd bang her
HELL YES - I'd bang her
bah...I agree w/H8R tooH8R said:What the hell is going on in this thread?? You're splitting hairs here folks.
As far as men go it should only ever boil down to four things:
No - I wouldn't bang her
Yes - I'd bang her but I'd regret it
Yes - I'd bang her
HELL YES - I'd bang her
You have to leave the first one in. Sometimes you really have to say no.loco said:Fixed it.
Yes, they are subjective... which is partially why we are debating this whole point. I don't care if people agree with me in terms of who is hot and who isn't. My point is that someone can be only average looking (i.e. NOT beautiful), but still be damn sexy, and vice versa.BurlyShirley said:No. The word's hot, sexy, pretty, whatever...they're all just subjective, and for the most part...other than "cute" can be used interchangably. Not that they have the EXACT same meaning, but if a chick can be described as ONE of those, usually two or three others willy apply as well. Except maybe to YOU. And of course, your last name isnt Webster or Hacker, so you arent the decider of such things...now are you?
Wrong - you just have to regret it when you didn't.H8R said:You have to leave the first one in. Sometimes you really have to say no.
jacksonpt said:...My point is that someone can be only average looking (i.e. NOT beautiful), but still be damn sexy, and vice versa.
Ahhhhh!!!! My eyes!!!!!douglas said:have fun Loco