Quantcast

Sweden: The final defeat of Socialism and the Welfare State

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
:cheers:


As the Rest of the World Embraces Capitalism...
Ross Kaminsky

For a total of all but one decade in the past nine, the Social Democrats, the main center-left in Sweden, have governed under massive welfare state policies. Sunday, for the first time in 12 years, they lost power to the center-right coalition led by Fredrik Reinfeldt and his Moderate Party which campaigned on cutting taxes and slimming down (though nothing like dismantling) the welfare state.

According to the UK's Independent, "On paper, things have been going well for most Swedes with economic growth higher than 5 per cent and inflation low. But while unemployment is officially 6 per cent, the rate for young people is several times that figure and much joblessness is hidden with huge numbers of people on sickness benefit. The Moderates argue the true unemployment figure is higher than 20 per cent."

Over recent decades, we have witnessed the spectacular collapse of the Soviet Union, the Soviet Bloc, and East Germany, and the large degree of acceptance of capitalism in Communist China. We have seen at least nine countries in Eastern and Central Europe adopt a flat tax. And we have the continuing spectacle of structurally high unemployment in the still socialst France and Germany, with corresponding weak economic performance.

Even Sweden, the left's paradigm of the beauties of socialism and the redistributive welfare state is now moving, albeit in baby steps, toward the economic freedom that countries all around them are demonstrating to be successful.

It is fascinating to see the countries with histories like Estonia, Lithuania, and Georgia, i.e. those with the most personal experiences under full-fledged socialism and communism, those who really know the damage that Marxist thinking does to a people, be the leaders toward economic freedom.

In another fascinating story, there is the "leaked" tape recording of the Socialist Prime Minister of Hungary saying how his party lied to win the last elections. According to the BBC story,

A brief excerpt was played on Hungarian state radio and others appeared on web sites. It is not clear how they were leaked.

In the excerpts, Mr Gyurcsany says harsh economic reforms are needed.

"There is not much choice. There is not, because we screwed up. Not a little, a lot. No European country has done something as boneheaded as we have.

"Evidently, we lied throughout the last year-and-a-half, two years. It was totally clear that what we are saying is not true.

"You cannot quote any significant government measure we can be proud of, other than at the end we managed to bring the government back from the brink. Nothing. If we have to give account to the country about what we did for four years, then what do we say?"

And in a truly fascinating bit of political theater, if true, the BBC story continues:

In a speech sprinkled with obscenities, he says: "We lied in the morning, we lied in the evening."

Some analysts suggest the leak may be with the prime minister's permission as he posted a full transcript on his own web blog.

Mr Gyurcsany may be trying to emphasise the need for tough reforms, they say. Local elections are set for 1 October.

Maybe even true Socialists are seeing the light...just not American socialists. As George Will says, there are more Marxists on the faculty at Harvard than in all of Eastern Europe.

Countries which have a longer history of economic and political freedom, those which should be the paradigms of liberty, sit back pathetically, letting the politics be dominated by unions, idealist idiots, haters of capitalism and freedom, or simply people who don't care or know enough to act for change. Sweden has finally moved out of that category, if just barely.

The tragedy from my perspective, however, is that the United States, the freest country that ever was, history's great example of a nation founded on classical liberal principles which theoretically include capitalism and property rights, has an electorate which might consider handing the reins of government over to people like John Kerry or Al Gore or Nancy Pelosi...people whose economic views are to the left of the voters in Sweden, maybe even to the left of voters in France, and far to the left of voters in Eastern Europe who, I repeat, have experienced what lefist policies really do to a nation and its citizens.

Americans are just barely escaping the unholy alliance between big unions, especially teachers and government workers, and the Democratic Party. These groups work together to reinforce each other and buy votes to keep themselves in power. It is a testament to us that they keep losing the most important elections, but also shameful that they are consistently so close.

Maybe people will not throw the ideas of socialism out of their heads until they suffer under it. As someone once said, a smart man learns from his mistakes and a wise man learns from the mistakes of others. The American voters are sadly unwise, but at least so far they have been just wise enough not to elect either of the last two Democrat candidates for President. Still, it is hard to be optimistic when the Republican Party has abandoned any pretense of standing for liberty or limited government. President Bush's Medicare prescription drug plan instantly added an unfunded liability triple the size of the entire Social Security liability. Spending is out of control and they can't even reform the disgusting earmark process.

Maybe we do need to suffer under a few years of Democrat control of government. While it's tempting to think that to force the GOP to get back to basics, I am so afraid of the damage the Democrats will do to our economy and our national security that I must hope the GOP keeps control of the House and Senate, at least for two years, and wins the next Presidential election. If a Republican wins the Presidency in 2008, I could probably live with them losing at least one house of Congress. The GOP has demonstrated clearly that one-party control is a fiscal disaster, no matter which party it is.

So, back to the point of the day: Next time you hear some leftist arguing for higher taxes, a bigger welfare state, and socialist-leaning policies, ask him what he thinks of Sweden. He probably won't know anything about yesterday's election since liberals rarely deal in the world of facts. Then you can tell him that his idols in that liberal paradise are slowly but surely abandoning their destructive fantasy...and suggest maybe he should do the same.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
:banana:

The end of Sweden’s one-party state
Published: 18th September 2006 15:09 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=4945


The defeat of the Social Democrats could turn Sweden into a normal democracy, where it is common for power to change hands, argues Nima Sanandaji of Swedish think-tank Captus.

Swedish politics changed dramatically on September 17th. With most of the votes counted, the centre-right Alliance is the clear winner of the 2006 general election, receiving around 48 percent of the votes compared to some 46 percent for the left-wing parties combined.

Sweden has often been described as a “one-party state”, since the Social Democrats have been in power for 65 of the last 74 years. The term one-party state is also used by critics to point out that the Social Democratic Party, the big labour unions and the government have merged together in many ways.

Government agencies are often headed by those loyal to the Social Democratic Party. Each year the various agencies spend in total over 2 billion Swedish kronor on forming public opinion and it can be argued that this often occurs from a clear ideological Social Democratic viewpoint.

In most countries it would not have been strange to see a party that has been in power for the last twelve years lose to the opposition. But in Sweden the victory of the center-right has redrawn the political map. The Social Democratic Party only received around 35 percent of the votes, lower than any time since 1914. On the other hand the main center-right party, the Moderates, got 26 percent of the votes, more than any time since 1928.

Surprisingly all of this occurred in a time when the Swedish economy was going strong. So what caused the Social Democrats to lose the election? There are most likely three problems that faced the Swedish labour movement. Firstly, the Social Democratic government has been combating the unemployment statistics rather than unemployment for the past years. Even young people are routinely being classified as disabled or given early retirement in order to remove them from the open unemployment statistics.

Over time the public have realized that the various government programs that are aimed at helping the unemployed do not have a long term benefit for those seeking jobs, but are rather in place mostly to show that the politicians are “doing something” to solve the problem.

Secondly, the Social Democrats are increasingly seen as the political nobility of Sweden. Those who climb to the top of the Social Democratic Party, or the main labour unions for that matter, are rewarded with top paying jobs as heads of government agencies and government companies, although they often have few merits in terms of education or working experience.

Outgoing Prime Minister Göran Persson managed to make his wife the president of Systembolaget, the massive government company that has a monopoly on sale of most alcoholic beverages. Together the couple bought a very expensive estate – not exactly a fit home for the leader of the Swedish labour movement.

And thirdly the many years with welfare policies have drained the traditionally strong working ethics of the Swedish population. More and more people are willing to live off government benefits rather than working. Many ordinary citizens are tired of working hard knowing that their neighbors are choosing to stay home and take advantage of the welfare systems.

The new centre-right Alliance has an ample opportunity to demonstrate that they are worthy of leading the country. Over time Sweden might even translate to a normal democracy where it is common for political power to change hands. At the same time the Social Democrats might seize the chance to reform their party – returning to their traditional roots as a labour party and putting the welfare of the workers over the self-interests of politicians and bureaucrats.
 

Inclag

Turbo Monkey
Sep 9, 2001
2,780
465
MA
I'm suprised that it doesn't irk you that "moderates" and "rights" in most of Europe are typically more liberal than our stateside democrats
 

blue

boob hater
Jan 24, 2004
10,160
2
california
I'm suprised that it doesn't irk you that "moderates" and "rights" in most of Europe are typically more liberal than our stateside democrats
Yeah...no, it's not starting to change. The developed world is polarizing, and the third world is tagging along.
 

rockwool

Turbo Monkey
Apr 19, 2004
2,658
0
Filastin
N8N8N8N8, where the L do you find articles like that first one... Did the republican party buy the rights to Pravda and made it an english speaking paper?

"And we have the continuing spectacle of structurally high unemployment in the still socialst France and Germany, with corresponding weak economic performance."
-Secretary General Javier Solana has argued that a minimum 10% unemployment is a desirable goal and critisized Sweden, a year or so ago, for having too little unemployment.

"Even Sweden, the left's paradigm of the beauties of socialism and the redistributive welfare state is now moving, albeit in baby steps, toward the economic freedom that countries all around them are demonstrating to be successful."
-Since about 8-10 years back the Social Democrats abandoned their social democratic (not socialist) ideas for liberal.

"Countries which have a longer history of economic and political freedom, those which should be the paradigms of liberty, sit back pathetically, letting the politics be dominated by unions, idealist idiots, haters of capitalism and freedom, or simply people who don't care or know enough to act for change. Sweden has finally moved out of that category, if just barely."
-I thought being healthy, educated and well housed were nessesitys for being free.


"John Kerry or Al Gore or Nancy Pelosi...people whose economic views are to the left of the voters in Sweden"
-Now this is a conclusion that you only can come to if you've been a freebaser for several years. The Moderates are a liberal party, but used to be a conservative party upto about 10 years ago. Not even in their wildest days were they to the right of the democratic left.

"He probably won't know anything about yesterday's election since liberals rarely deal in the world of facts."
-This guy must live in a pararell world to ours like in that Jet Li movie "The One".


Second article I can't object to.