Echo said:And that's kind of my point. We're looking at an extremely rare case where it appears that jail really did rehabilitate someone. And we're ignoring it. It's not like he's looking to rejoin society. Keeping him in jail the rest of his life, and the notoriety he has achieved for his turning his life around, could actually benefit other prisoners.
if someone is sentenced to death row....there is no attempt at rehabilitation. a non-life term is where the rehabilitation can work...why bother if the person is never to leave the walls of the prison? if you commit a crime that is heinous enough for society to condemn you to death then why would it suddenly be less offensive after 20 years and allow for a lesser penalty? humanistic forgiveness can be given by the family of the victim and even society, but that does not take away from the fact that consequences must be dealt. what message does it send to our already weak criminal justice system when we just bluff with the death penalty. if we're going to use it and the person is deserving of it at the time then use it....20 years on death row doesn't make them less deserving of it.