note to female officers: the taser is not a sex toy.which is pretty much a dead give-away
note to female officers: the taser is not a sex toy.which is pretty much a dead give-away
for benefit of doubt, maybe she was tazing her aunt flo:note to female officers: the taser is not a sex toy.
Watered down version? If tasers are not dangerous, why would there be a watered down version?i let my son give me a jolt with one of the watered down civilian version stun guns they sell at the gun show. he had a blast, i was shocked.
Active resistance generally constitutes the threat of bodily harm, so a taser would be justified. If it's a choice between a taser or a choke hold with a out of control suspect, where there is a risk harm to the suspect as well as the officer, the taser is usually going to be safer.reminder: it was designed as a tool for "active resistance" and above, not just as an alternative to deadly force. "active resistance" usually brings a pretty good a$$ whoopin' with it from the man, i'd much rather take a taser jolt than have nice big lumps all over from a baton.
Because an officer requires a fair amount of training before being issued a firearm or a taser, and most civilians require none, or almost none. Also a civilian taser is designed to incompacitate someone for a few (30)seconds, to give you time to escape or get help. A police taser is designed for dealing a potentially dangerous person and actually controlling and stopping them.i let my son give me a jolt with one of the watered down civilian version stun guns they sell at the gun show. he had a blast, i was shocked.
i think i may have been unclear with the intention of telling that story...i wasn't comparing a civilian taser to a law enforcement issue. just telling a funny story about letting my son get back at dad. the civilian one just tickled in comparison...but still was enough to distract me you should have seen his eyes light up when he heard that clicking noiseBecause an officer requires a fair amount of training before being issued a firearm or a taser, and most civilians require none, or almost none. Also a civilian taser is designed to incompacitate someone for a few (30)seconds, to give you time to escape or get help. A police taser is designed for dealing a potentially dangerous person and actually controlling and stopping them.
Imagine a rapist or crook with a ful blown police taser....not pretty.
You should rig the civilian one up to one of these units and play with your co-workersi think i may have been unclear with the intention of telling that story...i wasn't comparing a civilian taser to a law enforcement issue. just telling a funny story about letting my son get back at dad. the civilian one just tickled in comparison...but still was enough to distract me you should have seen his eyes light up when he heard that clicking noise
Because legislators are the same scared ninnies who try to keep guns out of the hands of law-abiding citizens while keeping punishments for violent criminals nice and light? Because they're the same morons who think limiting the legal number of rounds in an honest person's handgun is a serious move to reduce violent crime?Watered down version? If tasers are not dangerous, why would there be a watered down version?
the "watered down" versions are made for personal protection only, not submission and detainment like the LE versions are for. personal "stun guns" are made to "stun" the attacker at close range to allow the victim to get away. Law enforcement tasers are designed to incapacitate the offender so they can be safely apprehended. in case you forgot, it is STILL our job to get the bad guys off the street and we are not expected to be on the defensive side of an altercation.Watered down version? If tasers are not dangerous, why would there be a watered down version?
i think i may have been unclear with the intention of telling that story...i wasn't comparing a civilian taser to a law enforcement issue. just telling a funny story about letting my son get back at dad. the civilian one just tickled in comparison...but still was enough to distract me you should have seen his eyes light up when he heard that clicking noise
Pay attention here mate, the whole thread is about how the taser is not being used as an alternative to shooting but as an easy way to gain compliance. I know you're Canadian now but you should have retained some residual smarts.
couldn't the RCMP have dragged him behind a horse instead?I see in the news the cannuks are getting in on the tase first, tase second, then maybe think about working out what the situation is.
Cop already asking permission to tase as he was entering the hall
And why the **** did the cop feel it was needed to kneel on the guys neck when there are 2 cops on top of him and he has just been tased a few times?
Fire the f*cker I say.
Where's the line between doing your duty and manslaughter just out of curiosity?
You should rig the civilian one up to one of these units and play with your co-workers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Reaction
and just what town did this happen?The 18-year-old girl said her father raped her and her sister for a period of about five years, from when they were in their early teens, said prosecutor Amanda Sammons. The girl said he raped her in the family's mobile home and in the woods, Nelson said.
[no word on whether or not her marlboros were in a crush-proof box]
I see in the news the cannuks are getting in on the tase first, tase second, then maybe think about working out what the situation is.
Cop already asking permission to tase as he was entering the hall
And why the **** did the cop feel it was needed to kneel on the guys neck when there are 2 cops on top of him and he has just been tased a few times?
Fire the f*cker I say.
Where's the line between doing your duty and manslaughter just out of curiosity?
*edit* can't seem to find the clip I saw on the news last night. It clearly showed the cop already asking to tase as he was entering the room and well before he would have had any idea what was going on.
better off shot in the leg
Couldn't have produced a worse result per se.Plus, do you know what a femoral artery is,
Have you watched the video? A perfect example of a taser being used as a first measure.uh oh...looks like the armchair quarterback syndrome is in effect...D
You missed the point. If you're going to kill someone, what difference is your choice??? The guys is dead.Wrong; try again. Guns aren't non-lethal force instruments. We've been over this a million times. Plus, do you know what a femoral artery is, speaking of those who lack medical training?
Have you thought of a career in law enforcement?I saw a kid get tazed at a party a few weeks back. Kinda funny.
Sounds like he was resisting to me. Sleeping AND showing ID?FBI reviewing Tasering of sleeping man; no charges file
NORTH BRADDOCK, Pa. - Two North Braddock police officers won't face criminal charges for Tasering a man who was asleep at home. But the FBI will review the incident for possible civil rights violations.
Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen Zappala Jr. says county police determined Officers Gerard Kraly and Lukas Laeuricia (loo-REE'-see-uh) didn't commit a crime when they Tasered Shawn Hicks, who was sleeping on his couch.
Police came to Hicks home because they were alerted by a silent security alarm at his home about 2 a.m.
Hicks says the officers Tasered him again after he woke up and showed them ID to prove he lived at the home. Hicks' attorney says he will pursue civil action.
and if he was in the states with the terrorist paranoia going on there he would have been shot....how are they supposed to know who can handle a taser hit and who can't?....and as far as the knee to the head that's pretty much standard procedure...you see it all the time...DHave you watched the video? A perfect example of a taser being used as a first measure.
And that would have been unjustifiable use of force as well. Are these concepts really that difficult?and if he was in the states with the terrorist paranoia going on there he would have been shot....how are they supposed to know who can handle a taser hit and who can't?....and as far as the knee to the head that's pretty much standard procedure...you see it all the time...D
Apparently citizens haven't accepted this policy, hence the fact that it's a news item, and the fact that there is a little bit of outrage that 4 cops tasered an unarmed man to death 30 seconds after walking into the room with him.so I guess cops should show up with a health questionnaire for the person to fill out as well as a psychologist to make sure they can proceed....give me a break...citizens have accepted the policies of the police then complain when they actually implement them.
You think it's unjustifiable force then get out there and do something about it instead of complaining here....D
Flawless victory!Does that get into the little reptilian center in your brain where "thought" occurs?
Alas, this is the entire issue. You can't know....how are they supposed to know who can handle a taser hit and who can't?
Right, and this thread is the VAST minority of cases a tazer is used in. Hell just watch COPS. At least once an episode a guy runs, pulls a knife or pulls a gun and gets tazed. Also not the majority of cases I am sure, but enough to balance out the ones in this thread.I don't think you will find much cases of taser usage in which police lives were endangered in this thread...
Link:Lack of Taser Regulations- Related to management and oversight of taser usage within a department, it
must be noted that no federal regulative body has asserted oversight of current less-than-lethal stun
technology. No regulating body (private or public) has established industry standards, restrictions or guidelines
-- nor for importation from foreign suppliers. As a result, there is minimal guidance for public and private
management.
In addition, due to the fact that law enforcement agencies are managed at the local level, placement of stun
devices on the force continuum may vary amongst organizations. Although some organizations offer
exemplary use of force rules, there are no universally agreed upon matching of tactics (use of force) with
threatening behavior.
Lastly, the Consumer Products Safety Commission conducted the last and only federal regulatory review of
stun device safety in 1976. The technology evaluated at that time was found not likely to be lethal in normal
healthy aduts.