Errm, what are you doing reading this thread?Changleen said:Hey did you guys know that other stuff has been happening in the world? And some of it is WAY more important than this?
I'm trying to save you guys from being kept dumb by the media disinformation machine.fluff said:Errm, what are you doing reading this thread?
Too late - anyway PCs make you dumb, it's ofishul:Changleen said:I'm trying to save you guys from being kept dumb by the media disinformation machine.
you do realize you posted the quote in order to not be a 'fisker', right?fluff said:Too late - anyway PCs make you dumb, it's ofishul:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/21/how_dumb_kids/
Quote:
A few grown-ups would benefit from following the recommendations too. For years technology-advocates have made the lazy equation that "information" is "power" - but "information", we're belatedly discovering, doesn't in itself mean anything. As anyone who's watched the quality of online discussions deteriorate over the past ten years, "problem-solving deficit disorder" isn't entirely confined to schoolchildren. Many of today's debaters prefer "Fisking" - line-by-line rebuttals where facts are dropped like radar chaff - to rational debate or building a coherent argument.
During the 2004 Presidential TV debate season, technophiles advocated extending this approach to real-time "fact checking" of the candidates. But not all facts have equal value. And neither do they necessarily supply context - a blizzard of facts obscures the moral choices a voter weighs in making his decision.
For people who consider "facts" are an adequate substitute for knowledge, Google and the internet couldn't get here quickly enough.
I feel that I found multiple levels of irony in that particular frisk. I was so proud.$tinkle said:you do realize you posted the quote in order to not be a 'fisker', right?
what were we talking about??? whatever it was, i'm sure you're full of crap; now let me search the rm forums to back up that claim post haste.
Changleen said:I'm trying to save you guys from being kept dumb by the media disinformation machine.
Oh my god!
You have surpassed your own records for self importance and arrogance.
This is like the day Cal Ripken beat the consecutive games played record or the day that Pete Rose beat the all time hit record!
Brilliant.fluff said:Too late - anyway PCs make you dumb, it's ofishul:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/03/21/how_dumb_kids/
Quote:
A few grown-ups would benefit from following the recommendations too. For years technology-advocates have made the lazy equation that "information" is "power" - but "information", we're belatedly discovering, doesn't in itself mean anything. As anyone who's watched the quality of online discussions deteriorate over the past ten years, "problem-solving deficit disorder" isn't entirely confined to schoolchildren. Many of today's debaters prefer "Fisking" - line-by-line rebuttals where facts are dropped like radar chaff - to rational debate or building a coherent argument.
During the 2004 Presidential TV debate season, technophiles advocated extending this approach to real-time "fact checking" of the candidates. But not all facts have equal value. And neither do they necessarily supply context - a blizzard of facts obscures the moral choices a voter weighs in making his decision.
For people who consider "facts" are an adequate substitute for knowledge, Google and the internet couldn't get here quickly enough.
The whole point of the button is that if you get too effed up, you can't hit it. Plus its on a timer. On know people who have been on them.Westy said:You can't click the morphine button when your brain can't tell what pain is or what the concept of pain is.
Damn True said:Changleen said:I'm trying to save you guys from being kept dumb by the media disinformation machine.
Or maybe it was a joke...Oh my god!
You have surpassed your own records for self importance and arrogance.
This is like the day Cal Ripken beat the consecutive games played record or the day that Pete Rose beat the all time hit record!
I realized the irony of that this morning. A lack of food is what got her into this situation, and now its the "way out."stosh said:The thing that bothers me most is she did this to herself to stay thin.
If she dies without absolution does she not go to purgatory for a while (a bit like a refugee camp in Hell for those yet to be admitted to Heaven)?Just Lookin'... said:her parents, for being self-avowed 'good catholics' - seem to not understand the whole concept of their own religion.
i mean, doG does reward His children AFTER they have passed the 'veil' between life and death, no?
i'm not debating the merits of any religion, but if i were a Geezus-lovin' Catholic, i'd be quite all right with meeting up with Him.
the schindler's [some irony in that name, mebbe, but damnifiknowwhere] apparent fear and loathing of death seems at odds with the prime tenets of Christianity.
i mean, wtf?
She's finding that out right now.....................fluff said:If she dies without absolution does she not go to purgatory for a while (a bit like a refugee camp in Hell for those yet to be admitted to Heaven)?
that's weird how the world knows w/in 15 minutesAndyman_1970 said:She's finding that out right now.....................
"Unfortunately, just 10 or so minutes before she died we were told we had to leave the room because there would be an assessment of her condition and because her husband Michael wanted to be in the room," said Father Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life.
Pavone said Michael Schiavo outright rejected the Schindlers' request to be with their daughter in her final moments.
"His heartless cruelty continued until the end," he said
That surprises you? They made him out to be Hitler Jr. in the media, and then they expect him to be the bigger man? Reaping what you sow...$tinkle said:this part boils my blood:
sorry, i don't follow.Silver said:That surprises you? They made him out to be Hitler Jr. in the media, and then they expect him to be the bigger man? Reaping what you sow...
C'mon, you must have been reading some of the news lately. The **** was pretty much being thrown in one direction.$tinkle said:sorry, i don't follow.
the parents made him out to be "hitler jr."? that seems to be a rather brusque assessment. perhaps you're right (i haven't followed every gory detail), but i can't imagine they acted untowardly given the circumstances.
and that's just it: i've been reading the news, and when it (rather quickly) turned to gossip, i turned away. must say, however, didn't hear a lot of positive responses from the accussee's camp to the various charges levied. air america did have some choice comments, and if they're michael's advocate, then he's screwed.Silver said:C'mon, you must have been reading some of the news lately. The **** was pretty much being thrown in one direction.
Isn't he catholic? Isn't that the point of being a follower of Jesus (which catholics claim to be) to be the bigger man and love those you hate you or talk bad about you?Silver said:That surprises you? They made him out to be Hitler Jr. in the media, and then they expect him to be the bigger man? Reaping what you sow...
whats the old joke?Repack said:I realized the irony of that this morning. A lack of food is what got her into this situation, and now its the "way out."
I with Silver on this one.Silver said:That surprises you? They made him out to be Hitler Jr. in the media, and then they expect him to be the bigger man? Reaping what you sow...
expand on this please.RhinofromWA said:But given the legally appointed choice, Micheal as the gaurdian, I would have wanted that time to be with my wife, sans the circus the parents have made it.
ogrish accounts spiked this month, tooRhinofromWA said:In the larger relm of things this made millions aware and brought discussion of preparations of death. That is a good thing.
After more than 15 year I hope the hell he moved on.$tinkle said:expand on this please.
specifically: what do believe michael's feelings are toward his (now ex-) wife (not his common law wife, by whom he has 2 children, and with whom he lays down each night)?
I am not sure what you are talking about.....ogrish accounts spiked this month, too
see, right there: you & i could never date.RhinofromWA said:After more than 15 year I hope the hell he moved on.
WTF!?!?
What does everyone expect? I say good for him. SHe has been gone for (excuse me for not quoting the exact # of years) over 15 years. What is everyones beef with him finding someone else? Doesn't mean he doesn't love Terry.
I just can't comprehend the questioning of it..... >15yrs! He moved on and her parents never did.
Maybe because he was holding up his end of an agreement regarding her wishes? If that's the case (I don't know) then it could be regarded as an amazing act of loyalty when he could've just completely walked away and left her to a fate of being forever bed-ridden. All I know is that I would only want my wife making decisions for me if I wind up in a position like Terri did. She's the only person I trust to act on my wishes, my family would have no voice in the matter regardless of their good intentions.$tinkle said:why didn't he truly move on & divorce her? have you wondered that yourself?
This has been another ugly media invasion. Her family brought it on, we fed off it, and some fat cats got a few more coins. I agree, it has been disgusting.Jr_Bullit said:I have to say, I just read more about this woman than I really wanted to - and my conclusion reamains the same - this chit should be a private family matter. It's disgusting to see it paraded about like this.
not true.clancy98 said:because he couldn't legally divorce her because of local laws.
1st i've read of it, & even if true, that is irrelevant to marriage vows twix these two legal partners.clancy98 said:as a side note, Terri's parents testified to meeting and approving of his new "Mistress" in an earlier trial, did they not?
if we want to use emotionally manipulative language, this thread will take 15 years to die, tooclancy98 said:How old was Michael when all this happened? Terri was 22. Could you imagine marrying a beautiful young lady and then this happens and you are pinned with this responsibility
not suggesting it, just saying it was a viable alternative, especially given that he was de-facto common law married to whatshernameclancy98 said:By the way, you're all for "til death do us part" and then you suggest divorce? Thats a clear standpoint.
She was "dead" just her organs were still pumping.$tinkle said:see, right there: you & i could never date.
i'm a "hard-liner" w/ the whole till-death-do-us-part thing.
but even so, why didn't he truly move on & divorce her? have you wondered that yourself?
you very well could be right; we're only seeing the last hour unfold - he could have been albert schweitzer for all we know, but he's portrayed as albert desalvodan-o said:Maybe because he was holding up his end of an agreement regarding her wishes? If that's the case (I don't know) then it could be regarded as an amazing act of loyalty when he could've just completely walked away and left her to a fate of being forever bed-ridden.