Thanks, that's what I thought.DRB said:Chanqleen,
Peak oil makes baby Jesus cry.
Sincerely,
DRB
Thanks, that's what I thought.DRB said:Chanqleen,
Peak oil makes baby Jesus cry.
Sincerely,
DRB
fluff said:Oddly I was reading about this yesterday, something about peak production expected in the next 10-50 years and reserves between 1 billion and 1.6 billion, including sand/shale oils.
Seems you get a different story everywhere.
I wonder if baby Jesus made any other babies cry?
ALEXIS_DH said:i read an chart on wikipedia (which comes in turn from a bp report) about the oil peak, and all of north america already had. same with western europe.
iraq looks like its one of the furthest from hitting peak and reserves midpoint.
the same chart speculates iraq will hit its production peak on 2015.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves
And we finally have a winner. Well sort of.... oil is running out. Unless the abiotic insane asylum proves to not be an insane asylum.Changleen said:The truth is we should stop burning oil because it's the right thing to do, and maybe because we're being ripped off for it - Not because it's actually running out.
The analogy I heard was it's like hitting bullet with another bullet. Not so easy if couched in those terms.BurlyShirley said:Anyone else find it strange that THIS is new technology? I mean, we've had shoulder fired stingers for what...20 years now? I cant beleive this is just happening.
A stinger is trying to hit a target moving at less than the speed of sound to an altitude of 12,000 feet or so. From a physics perspective, it's the same problem, but the speeds involved are much higher with a ballistic missle and an interceptor. It's like trying to hit a baseball tossed underhand to you versus a Randy Johnson fastball. One it a lot easier to do.BurlyShirley said:Anyone else find it strange that THIS is new technology? I mean, we've had shoulder fired stingers for what...20 years now? I cant beleive this is just happening.
Are you saying the test was performed on a 1950's technology missle? If so it wouldn't make that much difference than any real missle threat we face but how hard would it be for someone to develop a stealthy missle? Tha would probably be the trump card on our MDS.N8 said:Actually the technology is pretty old...
My dad was a development engineer on the Nike Missile program back in the 50's and 60's as well as the Sidewinder and Stinger missiles at Army's White Sands Missile Range in NM.
The ABM missile was the Nike Zeus.
Westy said:Are you saying the test was performed on a 1950's technology missle? If so it wouldn't make that much difference than any real missle threat we face but how hard would it be for someone to develop a stealthy missle? Tha would probably be the trump card on our MDS.
US won't necessarily shoot down N.Korea missile
(2006-06-22)
By Carol Giacomo and Will Dunham
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - North Korea is far along in its preparations for testing a long-range ballistic missile but the United States would not necessarily use its missile defense system to shoot it down, U.S. officials said on Thursday.
After a week in which unidentified American officials had stoked alarm about activities at a missile site in eastern North Korea, the U.S. government appeared ready to ease tensions somewhat.
nothing says a big STFU than that!BurlyShirley said:LMAO!
I think its pretty hilarious that ONE option we are considering is shooting down their test missiles
That's a pretty good test.BurlyShirley said:LMAO!
I think its pretty hilarious that ONE option we are considering is shooting down their test missiles
blue said:Hooray for upsetting the global balance of power.
Yeah, It'll look great when you miss. Actually that's probably why the US'd never attempt it. They know they'll miss.N8 said:especially in our favor.
You do a good job of living up to your title.N8 said:especially in our favor.
A safer place for us or US is what he meant.valve bouncer said:This being a purely defensive weapon I'm assuming the US will share this technology with all and sundry. After all if everyone has this technology the world will be a safer place without the threat of nuclear war from ballistic missiles. I mean Bush is always going on about how he wants to make the world a safer place.
Is it still Friday where you are?DRB said:A safer place for us or US is what he meant.
Y'all can just suck eggs.
Though maybe since the Japanese helped with this latest test, you're included now..... I'll have to look into that.
Okay I've carefully reviewed Japan and have decided that you can in fact have the technology.DRB said:A safer place for us or US is what he meant.
Y'all can just suck eggs.
Though maybe since the Japanese helped with this latest test, you're included now..... I'll have to look into that.
What, even us lackeys?DRB said:Okay I've carefully reviewed Japan and have decided that you can in fact have the technology.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200945,00.html
But to the rest of the world, get to sucking...
Well, no. But is his perfidiousness reason for me to be left undefended?DaveW said:Never trust a lackey.
Would you trust Blair?
Just remember I'm always watching......fluff said:Well, no. But is his perfidiousness reason for me to be left undefended?
I may have to plot to usurp the KoF.
And I am fluff the unknowable. Touche.DRB said:Just remember I'm always watching......
Umm.....huh??? I'm lost......They launched an unarmed ICBM just for the hell of it....and it was successful that it actually flew??....amazing...groundbreaking even....N8 said:
U.S. Successfully Completes Missile Test
VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE, Calif. (AP) -- The Air Force successfully launched an unarmed intercontinental ballistic missile early Thursday.
The Minuteman III dummy warheads were fired at 3:14 a.m. and traveled about 4,200 miles before hitting a water target in the Marshall Islands.
The launch was delayed by a day because of a power outage at a radar facility that handles flights in and out of Southern California. The purpose is to test the defense system's reliability and accuracy.
Earlier this month, North Korea shook up the world by firing several missiles into the Sea of Japan, including a failed long-range missile.
The North Korean launch raised questions about the readiness of the U.S. missile defense system, which includes interceptors housed in underground silos in California and Alaska.