Quantcast
  • Come enter the Ridemonkey Secret Santa!

    We're kicking off the 2024 Secret Santa! Exchange gifts with other monkeys - from beer and snacks, to bike gear, to custom machined holiday decorations and tools by our more talented members, there's something for everyone.

    Click here for details and to learn how to participate.

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
Various companies, including standard OEMs and some upstarts from the electric motorcycling world (!) of all things, are gearing up to provide the guts of future electric vehicles. This is probably more relevant for the auto manufacturers planning their 2014 lineups, but these things definitely could be used by a spendthrift hobbyist in converting an existing car or wheeled conveyance of some sort.

MotoCzysz D1g1tal Dr1ve D1 with Remy motors, 75 kW of power, a claimed 1000 N-m of torque <-- no doubt through the gearing, a misleading figure, and a weight under 150 lbs. It's an all in one unit, with the motor, inverter, oil pump, gear reduction, and differential all in that box.



Mission Motors is also pimping its system as part of its MissionEVT program. Specs are few and far between, but supposedly some of its components were used in a hopped up ~200 hp Honda CR-Z shown at SEMA, for whatever that's worth. Here's their motor and controller with fancy "crabon fibre", as BikeSnobNYC would put it.



Getrag is also in the game with their 1eDT240 topping their lineup. 75 and 145 kW motor options, a similarly misleading 1,770 ft-lbs of torque as measured after the reduction gearing (162 ft-lbs at the motor itself), and looking production-ready enough that Volvo signed on for use in their C30 EV program. Add a controller and a big ol' battery and you'd be ready to go.

 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
too bad this isnt coming to the States instead of the Volt. the front end is much nicer than the Volt IMO


General Motors is ready to begin taking orders for the 2011 Opel Ampera, the European cousin of the Chevrolet Volt. The MSRP has been set at €42,900, which equals roughly $58,718 USD based on current exchange rates, or $18,438 more than a Volt here in the States. Sure, the front end is more aggressive and the wheels are better but is the Ampera nearly $20,000 better than the our all-American electric sedan?

The answer lies with Europe's Value Added Tax, otherwise known as VAT – add German's 19 percent VAT, and the final price becomes €42,900. Take away the VAT and the price is €36,050 or about $49,280, which is a bit closer to the cost of the Volt.
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
the Volt looks even less special after hearing the Focus gets 100miles on a charge.
there hasnt been that much press on the Focus EV which is surprising.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776


99 MPG-equivalent combined rating for the Leaf from the EPA, for what that's worth.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776


99 MPG-equivalent combined rating for the Leaf from the EPA, for what that's worth.
… and the confusing corresponding label for the Volt:



As Jalopnik puts it:

…

And the final EPA label shows no sign of the 230-mpg city fuel economy figure that GM played up so vigorously last year. Volt executives said that number - which was roughly the highway cycle performance of the car driving on its batteries alone - was not "overly descriptive of its combined performance."

While the true 60 mpg-e figure ranks the Volt best among compact cars, it's not far removed from the 50 mpg of the Prius hybrid. Even assuming a Volt driver goes without gas for a year, by the EPA's own figures the Volt saves $263 over the Prius annually, a small gap given the Volt costs roughly $10,000 more.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
I just got my first electric bill here in Long Island* and was shocked to find that we're paying a 21 cent/kWh effective rate. Click the link to see the work, as it were.

Seattle's effective rate given our current, low usage would be 5.75 cents/kWh and Portland's would be 13.3 cents/kWh, for comparison. An extra ~10 kWh/day that we'd use if we had a Leaf would bump up all of these effective rates a bit but wouldn't change the conclusions.



How is this transportation related? Well, 21 cents/kWh is so expensive that it almost makes driving an electric car not make economic sense: driving a Nissan Leaf that uses ~300 Wh/mile for the same 45 miles that our Prius travels on 1 gallon of ~$3/gallon gas would cost $2.84 (probably more like $3 counting for charger inefficiency, actually)!

Admittedly, the Prius is a corner case for gasoline-powered vehicles and most people with both lower electric rates and more inefficient gas vehicles would see bigger savings, but it underscores the point that one must be aware of both the cost and the origin of local electric power before springing for that shiny new BEV. Live in Seattle? Hell yeah, buy one. Live in West Virginia? Keep the Prius rather than have the coal miners work overtime.

*: the astute reader will note that we've been out on Long Island for just shy of a year and a half. Until Oct 1 of this year we were in an apartment with utilities included, so this is indeed our first Long Island electric bill.
 
Last edited:

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
California, which will surely be one of the big markets for the Leaf, is also one of the markets with the most expensive power:

http://www.pge.com/tariffs/tm2/pdf/ELEC_SCHEDS_E-1.pdf

Note that the rate for residential electricity can go anywhere from 11.9 cents/kWh for baseline usage to over 40 cents/kWh after one exceeds 200% of their defined baseline.

Yikes.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
I want. Industrial porn showing why Nissan is worlds away from an AMP or <shudders> ZAP:

 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
lots of negatives. not too many positives.
The two-seat CR-Z is derived from the Insight, a five-passenger hybrid hatchback that also scored too low to be recommended. To be sure, there are improvements in the CR-Z: the interior isn't so glaringly cheap, and handling is much more nimble than the Insight. The CR-Z's manual transmission is crisp and easy to shift and 35 mpg is nothing to sneeze at.

But compared to a long list of drawbacks, that good news isn't enough to recommend the car.

Handling is short on steering feel, a recent (and unwelcome) Honda trait. Even for a small sports coupe, the ride is stiff and noise levels are high. The stability control intervenes too late when it's needed, so the CR-Z's tail can swing out mid-corner. Lousy rear and over-the-shoulder visibility made changing lanes "like Russian Roulette," according to one tester's logbook comment. A diminutive 400-lb. payload capacity somewhat negates the large cargo hold and speaks to a real limitation in a country where 200-lb. adults are commonplace.

Even the details rankle: The car shuts off when stopped to save fuel -- but unlike most other hybrids, the air conditioner shuts off too, making it a drag on a hot day. The exterior door handles are awkward to grab, and you basically lunge in and out of the low-slung car.

So just because it's a Honda doesn't mean it's a good car. Even if the CR-Z turns out to be reliable, it scores too low for us to recommend it.
http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2010/12/2011-honda-cr-z-hybrid-scores-too-low-for-consumer-reports-to-recommend.html
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
http://blogs.consumerreports.org/cars/2010/12/against-the-current-the-reality-of-the-award-winning-chevrolet-volt.html

Interim conclusion:
The Volt works, but depending on how it is used and where, it may not save you money, especially in the Northeast or California. In those regions especially, the Prius remains a more cost-effective, reliable choice for green motoring.

Of course, money-saving is not the Volt&#8217;s only raison-de-d&#8217;être. This is an electric-drive car that conserves energy in electric mode and does not come with range anxiety. As such, it advances the cause of reducing greenhouse gases and reducing our reliance on foreign oil. According to our recent green-car survey, saving money is not the number one goal for EV intenders, anyway.

It goes without saying that if gasoline prices go up significantly, or if you live in a region where electricity is cheap, then any cost-based energy-use calculation will tip the scales more in the Volt&#8217;s favor&#8212;but there is no getting around the high purchase price and modest fuel economy if straying beyond the EV range.
Consumer Reports saw 30 mpg in charge-sustaining mode.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
43,144
15,222
Portland, OR
There are a few CR-Z's around here, I want to drive one. I liked the way the '08 Fit drove, it was a lot like my CR-X in terms of feel. I still miss the 48mpg that little bastard got, too.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
There are a few CR-Z's around here, I want to drive one. I liked the way the '08 Fit drove, it was a lot like my CR-X in terms of feel. I still miss the 48mpg that little bastard got, too.
If the CR-Z drives at all like the Insight--and, sharing the same platform, I think it would--it won't be like a Fit. The Fit feels spritely despite being slow in absolute terms but the Insight is/was a turd.
 

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
41,875
19,198
Riding the baggage carousel.
Ouch! It really stings to see the curvaceous spectacles that car designers can come up with, only to then find out the resulting electric speedsters are either far too expensive or nowhere near becoming a reality. Latest in this group of four-wheeled objects of desire is Jaguar's C-X75, which roars from 0 to 60mph in 3.4 seconds, cranks out 780bhp courtesy of a quartet of electric motors and a pair of micro gas turbines, and reaches a screaming 205mph at its absolute zenith. You can go for 68 miles just on electric juice or 560 if you let the gasworks recharge the Li-ion battery pack on the go. So it's gorgeous inside and out, it comes with swan doors, high-res LCD screens and an aluminum body, and it has less chance of being on sale than a dodo sandwich. Yep, it's an electric supercar alright.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/29/jaguar-c-x75-is-the-780bhp-electric-supercar-weve-all-been-wait/


:drool:
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
big government protects the stupid yet again
Regardless of whether or not there's an actual need for pedestrian warning systems for hybrid and electric vehicles, the U.S. Senate has voted unanimously to approve a measure that would make the noise-adding setup standard on all vehicles that can operate &#8211; even if just momentarily &#8211; without the burble of an engine.

The measure, called the Pedestrian Safety Enhancement Act of 2010 and backed by Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, aims to establish standards for alerting pedestrians of the possible danger of an approaching vehicle that moves in near silence. With the Senate voting in favor of the bill, it will now head off to the House of Representatives, where it's expected to pass with ease.

http://www.autoblog.com/2010/12/13/senate-unanimously-rules-in-favor-noisy-hybrids-electric-cars/
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
So will they have some kind of device that can put the sound into the pedestrian's blaring ipod?
Use a very low frequency so they can feel it more than hear it or maybe go with a low intensity raytheon pain ray setup instead.

 
Last edited:

skatetokil

Turbo Monkey
Jan 2, 2005
2,383
-1
DC/Bluemont VA
Interesting idea with the turbine though. If all you are doing is charging batteries with the gas engine, you have totally different engine requirements and a turbine might be more appropriate than a reciprocating piston design.

You can always operate it in its peak efficiency range and you don't have to design for a broad torque curve like most street cars.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
Last time we filled up the Prius we calculated 39 mpg. That was kind of disappointing until today, when I calculated all of 21.3 mpg from our Fit. Same kind of driving (stop and go city traffic), same cold weather, and the Fit in theory should benefit from my slower driving style as compared to my wife.

Hybrids do work. Whowouldathoughtit. I'd be surprised if I got above 30 mpg in similar driving in a diesel.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
43,144
15,222
Portland, OR
I saw a scooter with a roof in the rain this weekend. It looked liked a smaller version of yours, but I couldn't see the brand. Looked like it was doing well, though.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776


Honda to lease EV-neo electric scooter in Japan

Honda proclaims that it will start leasing the EV-neo to select customers in Japan beginning on December 24th. The automaker plans to have at least 100 of the battery-powered scooters on the roads by next March – and up to 1,000 attacking the streets by the end of 2011.
While I welcome any EV experiments by major manufacturers, with the support and R&D that that entails, this one looks like a dud besides being restricted to the land of the rising sun: $5k to almost $7k, performance comparable to a 50 cc scooter, and 30 km of range. Hmph.
 

I.van

Monkey
Apr 15, 2007
188
0
Australia
I know its probably already been mentioned, but I am loving the CX-75 concept from jag.

As someone who works in the power industry, this seems like an elegant solution.



 

TheMontashu

Pourly Tatteued Jeu
Mar 15, 2004
5,549
0
I'm homeless
Last time we filled up the Prius we calculated 39 mpg. That was kind of disappointing until today, when I calculated all of 21.3 mpg from our Fit. Same kind of driving (stop and go city traffic), same cold weather, and the Fit in theory should benefit from my slower driving style as compared to my wife.

Hybrids do work. Whowouldathoughtit. I'd be surprised if I got above 30 mpg in similar driving in a diesel.
Just convinced my mom to buy a jetta TDI over a prius. She took her friends out for a few days to try it. She averaged exactly the same as your prius at 39, with no hybrid drive or ignition system to work on. Not to mention the thing looks 100000 times nicer and sounds super cool

There are also dudes who build their diesel trucks for mileage, there is a guy on one of the diesel boards claiming 34 highway in his 3/4 ton
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,798
8,776
Would be far more environmentally friendly to build them in more places than ship them...

That's common sense, but common sense doesn't account for the massive scale of these ships. Even if they were built in more places there'd still be a long truck ride at the end of the journey. I'd wager that truck ride has a large (larger?) contribution to the transporation "costs".
Just convinced my mom to buy a jetta TDI over a prius. She took her friends out for a few days to try it. She averaged exactly the same as your prius at 39, with no hybrid drive or ignition system to work on. Not to mention the thing looks 100000 times nicer and sounds super cool

There are also dudes who build their diesel trucks for mileage, there is a guy on one of the diesel boards claiming 34 highway in his 3/4 ton
jimmydean will attest that that mileage figure is suspect.

With regard to the TDI 39 is the WORST tank we've ever gotten. I'm going to go ahead and guess that your mom's 39 mpg (which, in terms of CO2 emissions equates to 34 mpg on gasoline, source: http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/420f05001.htm ) wasn't in frigid winter weather and stop and go New York-area city traffic.
 

syadasti

i heart mac
Apr 15, 2002
12,690
290
VT
That's common sense, but common sense doesn't account for the massive scale of these ships. Even if they were built in more places there'd still be a long truck ride at the end of the journey. I'd wager that truck ride has a large (larger?) contribution to the transporation "costs".
All vehicles use truck transportation even in the country they are made, they don't drive the leaf from the factory in Japan to dealerships in Japan. Automakers also ship some vehicles by rail which is about 70% more efficient than truck but not as good as boat (large boat is about 60% better than rail but is more limited by ports which can handle large shipping vessels). They also have hybrid and/or electric cargo rail and truck in production, they don't have hybrid cargo vessels which do better than average (see below).

Regardless with only a single factory they will be wasting more resources than having multiple factories around the world.

Average Use
Barge - .002 gallons diesel/Ton Mile
Rail - .005 gallons diesel/Ton Mile
Truck - .017 gallons diesel/Ton Mile

Here is a relatively new comparison test:

MotorWeek and Cars.com took six cars with the highest government fuel economy ratings to the mountains of Western Maryland for a typical weekend family outing. The gas sippers tested were the 2010 Toyota Prius, 2010 Honda Insight, 2010 Ford Fusion Hybrid, 2009 Volkswagen Jetta TDI, 2010 Audi A3 TDI, and the 2009 Smart ForTwo.

Each car was equipped with a data recorder for monitoring driving and engine performance. The cars were put through the paces, covering 500 miles of extremely challenging terrain over three days, with one car reigning supreme in terms of overall comfort, performance, handling and of course, fuel economy.

"We found the Prius, in the end, offered a really top-notch interior, a peppy ride and great mileage," said Patrick Olsen, editor-in-chief of Cars.com. "There were several close competitors, but the Prius's new look and frugal ways won us over."

The full report airs on MotorWeek episode 2902. Here are the results of the MotorWeek and Cars.com Power & Economy Drive by the numbers:

Car Type Drive mpg /EPA mpg
--- ---- --------- -------
1. 2010 Toyota Prius hybrid 49.2 /50.0
2. 2010 Honda Insight hybrid 40.5 /41.0
3. 2010 Audi A3 TDI diesel 38.2 /34.0
4. 2009 VW Jetta TDI diesel 36.2 /34.0
5. 2009 Smart ForTwo gasoline 35.3/ 36.0
6. 2010 Ford Fusion hybrid 32.9 /39.0
 
Last edited:

TheMontashu

Pourly Tatteued Jeu
Mar 15, 2004
5,549
0
I'm homeless
jimmydean will attest that that mileage figure is suspect.

With regard to the TDI 39 is the WORST tank we've ever gotten. I'm going to go ahead and guess that your mom's 39 mpg (which, in terms of CO2 emissions equates to 34 mpg on gasoline, source: http://www.epa.gov/oms/climate/420f05001.htm ) wasn't in frigid winter weather and stop and go New York-area city traffic.
It was on a newer common rail one, they are damn efficient. That may be, but imagine the emissions if some one was producing a diesel competitor to a prius, it would kick the crap out of it.


I could also care less about emissions, I have an old diesel truck with no form of emissions controllers and a newly shortened exhaust, and a few mills off the fuel plate. In short, I get a nice cloud of smoke.