Quantcast

eric strt6

Resident Curmudgeon
Sep 8, 2001
24,361
15,113
directly above the center of the earth
The Samsung S10 was released in the spring of 2019, so in terms of the life cycle of what majority of the world thinks about with phones, it's ancient, but it's still being updated from what I can tell.

Though doing any sort of exchange of personal data through an app on any phone is really hard to tell if the transmission is actually secure or not. It's not in your face like in a web browser. I believe some app builders have been exposed for this in the past and/or exploited.

I'd even be leary of using any of the pay for use VPN services out there for anything serious. You're better off just going home and doing your work through a known encrypted/https connection, at least imo.
We don't do anything using the cell phone. I believe she uses the secure network her corporation installed to do the companies North American (Canada, USA, Mexico) financials remotely
 

junkyard

You might feel a little prick.
Sep 1, 2015
2,616
2,347
San Diego
No worries - he still uses checks and deposit slips. :homer:
checks are awesome, no fees, no electronic tomfoolery, it’s also a receipt, someone has to keep the post office going. Deposit slips are dumb though, bank tellers don’t even look at that shit most of the time.
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,140
7,829
SADL
checks are awesome, no fees, no electronic tomfoolery, it’s also a receipt, someone has to keep the post office going. Deposit slips are dumb though, bank tellers don’t even look at that shit most of the time.
Bank tellers?
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,792
5,616
Ottawa, Canada
The Samsung S10 was released in the spring of 2019, so in terms of the life cycle of what majority of the world thinks about with phones, it's ancient, but it's still being updated from what I can tell.

Though doing any sort of exchange of personal data through an app on any phone is really hard to tell if the transmission is actually secure or not. It's not in your face like in a web browser. I believe some app builders have been exposed for this in the past and/or exploited.

I'd even be leary of using any of the pay for use VPN services out there for anything serious. You're better off just going home and doing your work through a known encrypted/https connection, at least imo.
Can you explain that part to me? I'm not particularly tech savvy... I tend to hate apps on my phone because I'm worried about companies collecting data on me, but hadn't thought about security of transactions.

And is there difference between visiting an https site via wifi vs mobile data? In terms of security?
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,140
7,829
SADL
Any time I have walked into a bank these last few years, the tellers are standing around in a group, looking bored AF. Not sure if that an enviable position or not?
I've only used them to withdraw large sum of cash to make shady transactions.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
43,060
15,148
Portland, OR
The Samsung S10 was released in the spring of 2019, so in terms of the life cycle of what majority of the world thinks about with phones, it's ancient, but it's still being updated from what I can tell.

Though doing any sort of exchange of personal data through an app on any phone is really hard to tell if the transmission is actually secure or not. It's not in your face like in a web browser. I believe some app builders have been exposed for this in the past and/or exploited.

I'd even be leary of using any of the pay for use VPN services out there for anything serious. You're better off just going home and doing your work through a known encrypted/https connection, at least imo.
After working at 2 different banks (one regional one national) I won't use banking apps. I will use secure websites, though. I don't use the PayPal app, either. PayPal is the only non bank service I use. Hell, I had an x.com account back in the day. :rofl:
 

canadmos

Cake Tease
May 29, 2011
21,947
21,467
Canaderp
Can you explain that part to me? I'm not particularly tech savvy... I tend to hate apps on my phone because I'm worried about companies collecting data on me, but hadn't thought about security of transactions.
On a phone when using an app, you just see the app and there is generally no information given about how your data is transmitted or where it goes.

Compare that to pulling up a web browser, where you can easily see if the connection is secure or not.

For example in Edge and Chrome, you can click the little icon to the left of the site address and easily view this info:
1677683406054.png


If there is something wrong with the site's certificate, you'll normally get a full page warning and you'll need to click through the warning to continue - in some cases you can't even click through. So as long as you go to the correct site and the certificate is valid, you should be good*.

None of this applies to any website that uses "http", as that protocol is not secure by design.

Of course, there are situations where this can lead to a false sense of security. Like if you go to a website spoofing another one for nefarious reasons, https://facebooks.com for example, it could very well have a valid certificate and not present any warning.

And is there difference between visiting an https site via wifi vs mobile data? In terms of security?
If you're using secure/encrypted connected to websites, there isn't much of a difference, assuming you mean wifi in a public location.

Personally, I avoid any wifi hotspots, not really for security reasons, but it opens you up to having your information collected in different ways. Even if you use a pay for use VPN connection, your information is being handed off to that service provider and being dumped somewhere else in the world - I don't understand how that is any "safer" than just using your mobile data smartly, despite all the ads for NordVPN and others everywhere.

Best option is still doing anything sensitive at home on your network, that way you generally know what is connected and you are behind your ISP's modem/router.

Those are just my thoughts on the matter, though I'm not a security expert. :nerd: :panic:
 

junkyard

You might feel a little prick.
Sep 1, 2015
2,616
2,347
San Diego
So I guess I was onto something with only doing purchases and banking at home on my laptop with ride monkey and porn on my phone.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,721
8,732
That looks to neither be a 4 nor an S to my not very trained eye. @Nick , assistance to aisle 3 pls
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
43,060
15,148
Portland, OR
Looks like a base Carerra, and a 996. No, thank you.

Now THIS is a beauty...
It's only slightly more, not sure I can justify the increase.

So a base Carrera isn't worth a look? My Vette was as basic a bitch as they come minus Z51 (not a huge deal, but a very nice option to have) and was fun as hell. 6 speed and 350hp with amazing balance. I guess I assumed the Carrera would be the same.
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,122
10,677
AK
IME, Think really hard about any car more than 10 years old. Unless you have a full auto-shop with lifts and diagnostic, theres generally too much old-car shit to deal with.
 

Nick

My name is Nick
Sep 21, 2001
24,898
16,457
where the trails are
It's only slightly more, not sure I can justify the increase.

So a base Carrera isn't worth a look? My Vette was as basic a bitch as they come minus Z51 (not a huge deal, but a very nice option to have) and was fun as hell. 6 speed and 350hp with amazing balance. I guess I assumed the Carrera would be the same.
Base models are definitely worth looking at! And obviously the 993 Turbo is a different class entirely. I would have to check if that year 996 had motor bearing issues, but many/most of the 996 had a motor bearing problem that caused catastrophic failures.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
43,060
15,148
Portland, OR
Base models are definitely worth looking at! And obviously the 993 Turbo is a different class entirely. I would have to check if that year 996 had motor bearing issues, but many/most of the 996 had a motor bearing problem that caused catastrophic failures.
I figured with over 50k miles IMS bearing had been dealt with, but maybe not. I am aware of the issue, but the fix while not cheap does actually fix it if it's been done.
 

6thElement

Schrodinger's Immigrant
Jul 29, 2008
17,214
14,679
Interesting to see that Tesla have retrofitted some supercharger locations with plug adapters to connect to normal EV's - so you can pull up and charge your Kia at such a location etc.
 

Toshi

butthole powerwashing evangelist
Oct 23, 2001
39,721
8,732
Interesting to see that Tesla have retrofitted some supercharger locations with plug adapters to connect to normal EV's - so you can pull up and charge your Kia at such a location etc.
Mandated to to unlock sweet fed funding iirc
 

maxyedor

<b>TOOL PRO</b>
Oct 20, 2005
5,496
3,141
In the bathroom, fighting a battle
The conspiracy theorists are going nuts over that Ford patent. To me it's neither here nor there, probably a positive because it means no more sketchy repo guys and maybe cheaper financing because they cars will be easier to get back damage-free. Ultimately any issues are far outweighed by the Lolz at the expense of the conspiracy crowd.
 

dump

Turbo Monkey
Oct 12, 2001
8,466
5,101
Jamaica is full of japanese mini-bus type and other utilitarian vehicles… things we don’t get in north america. The toyotas are particularly plentiful, but there are hondas, vws and others - all right hand drive of course. I know some of the crew here would make good use of these!

Toyota:
Corolla fielder
Voxy
Alpha
Probox
Hiace
Fortuner
Harriet (lexus)
Noah
Corolla Axio

Vw saveiro (pickup car)

Nissan tiida