Quantcast

The Economy (2019?)

Brian HCM#1

MMMMMMMMM BEER!!!!!!!!!!
Sep 7, 2001
32,119
378
Bay Area, California
UofC schools are fixed prices for residents, correct? that's a small break, at least.
I can't understand how anyone gets themselves through college at $25k-$50k per year.
Yes, state tuition is fairly close, university's I believe can be much more. Unfortunately its so competitive, plus it seems like local schools rather get out of state students because of out of state tuition. Easy money for the school. My kid for instance, fucked around until April of his Jr. year in HS with a 2.7 GPA (he did play 4 years of football & track). He was forced to go to summer school before his senior year started to get his grades up before submitting college applications. He ended up graduating with a 3.3, decent grades, but not near good enough to get into any of his preferred CA schools, San Diego St, UCLA & UC Santa Barbara. With his GPA plus doing fairly well on his ACT & SAT got into several out of state schools. Colorado State was his top pick and is part of WUE ( Western Undergraduate Exchange) which could have saved us about $5K-$7K a semester if his GPA was around a 3.4-3.5 when entering :banghead: . Now we're shelling out $45K a year for school & living expenses:banghead:. We told both kids first 4 years are on us, after that they're on your own. That being said, my son is doing really well maintaining a 3.5 GPA through his first 3 semesters plus being involved in his fraternity.
 

stoney

Part of the unwashed, middle-American horde
Jul 26, 2006
21,659
7,331
Colorado
Yes, state tuition is fairly close, university's I believe can be much more. Unfortunately its so competitive, plus it seems like local schools rather get out of state students because of out of state tuition. Easy money for the school. My kid for instance, fucked around until April of his Jr. year in HS with a 2.7 GPA (he did play 4 years of football & track). He was forced to go to summer school before his senior year started to get his grades up before submitting college applications. He ended up graduating with a 3.3, decent grades, but not near good enough to get into any of his preferred CA schools, San Diego St, UCLA & UC Santa Barbara. With his GPA plus doing fairly well on his ACT & SAT got into several out of state schools. Colorado State was his top pick and is part of WUE ( Western Undergraduate Exchange) which could have saved us about $5K-$7K a semester if his GPA was around a 3.4-3.5 when entering :banghead: . Now we're shelling out $45K a year for school & living expenses:banghead:. We told both kids first 4 years are on us, after that they're on your own. That being said, my son is doing really well maintaining a 3.5 GPA through his first 3 semesters plus being involved in his fraternity.
Shit, I didn't get into most of my schools in '98 (which was easier) with a 3.5, 3 sports - one with a state champion, 1500+ on my SAT (800 on one). I got into Cal and UCI with athletic admissions, although we're pretty sure i would have been academically admitted to UCI, Riverside on academics, not UCSB or UCSD. Did you really think a 3.3 would get him into a UC at all? You have some seriously next level optimism there.

This socialism you bitch about is what keeps the cost of school reasonable* for public schools. The caveat is that to take advantage of it, you have to meet levels to do such. A CA resident will be accepted into CA school as long as they meet minimum requirements and there is space. The school will always accept the best students possible (capitalism?), but the state will accept them if you apply to schools that accept at that level.

I'm sure UC Merced or CSU [central valley/secondary] would have taken him with those grades; they might just not be what you want. There are CSU schools that are still good schools where you wouldn't be paying through the nose to get him through school. You could probably be taking advantage of the system everybody pays into and be paying way less if you were realistic about acceptance levels with grades.

I'm not trying to insult your son, because his grades in college are definitely good, but you bitching about school cost is somewhat ironic given you had ways to mitigate those costs because of existing socially friendly policies. And those more socially friendly policies would help keep school cost down in general or even potentially eliminate them with better govt spending or taxation structure. Btw, you don't and never will make enough money to be impacted by effectively every policy being proposed to help make these things more affordable.
 

Brian HCM#1

MMMMMMMMM BEER!!!!!!!!!!
Sep 7, 2001
32,119
378
Bay Area, California
If you're so worried about money, why are you buying his friends?




Thanks folks, here all week!
LOL, funny. He actually went there with some of his HS friends. He's just living the dream
Shit, I didn't get into most of my schools in '98 (which was easier) with a 3.5, 3 sports - one with a state champion, 1500+ on my SAT (800 on one). I got into Cal and UCI with athletic admissions, although we're pretty sure i would have been academically admitted to UCI, Riverside on academics, not UCSB or UCSD. Did you really think a 3.3 would get him into a UC at all? You have some seriously next level optimism there.

This socialism you bitch about is what keeps the cost of school reasonable* for public schools. The caveat is that to take advantage of it, you have to meet levels to do such. A CA resident will be accepted into CA school as long as they meet minimum requirements and there is space. The school will always accept the best students possible (capitalism?), but the state will accept them if you apply to schools that accept at that level.

I'm sure UC Merced or CSU [central valley/secondary] would have taken him with those grades; they might just not be what you want. There are CSU schools that are still good schools where you wouldn't be paying through the nose to get him through school. You could probably be taking advantage of the system everybody pays into and be paying way less if you were realistic about acceptance levels with grades.

I'm not trying to insult your son, because his grades in college are definitely good, but you bitching about school cost is somewhat ironic given you had ways to mitigate those costs because of existing socially friendly policies. And those more socially friendly policies would help keep school cost down in general or even potentially eliminate them with better govt spending or taxation structure. Btw, you don't and never will make enough money to be impacted by effectively every policy being proposed to help make these things more affordable.
We his grades were no where good enough as did he, we didn't even want to apply. Yes he could have probably got into San Jose State and easily walk into Cal State East Bay. However, he wanted to go away and not do the commuter school. That being said one of his good friends graduated with a 4.6 and a near perfect ACT and was denied into UCLA which was his dream school. He's now at UC Davis which is still a great school, just the location sucks compared to SoCal. He's studying to be a Dr. He wanted to go to a D1 school, do the fraternity thing, go to football games etc. Just embrace to whole college life. I dropped out of college and my with was the only one in her family to ever graduate college. My wife had no money growing up, and had to put herself through school, JC first then Cal State East Bay. Yep, cheap but she always dreamed about going to UCSD but didn't. She didn't want our son to miss of the whole college experience that she missed. Looking back and hanging out with him at school has me kicking myself for not continuing on and graduating. Just got sucked into the construction gig making a ton of money in the late 80's early 90's, bought cool toys, started investing in the stock market during the dot.com boom etc.

Where would the money come from for these schools? Tax people who already went to college or kids are out of college, on top of free medical? want to fix it? Have the schools responsible for the loans. Borrow from the school, not a private entity. If they had some skin in the game, I think tuition would go way down, as they'd have to eat the loan if there was a default. Anyways, yep I'm bitching about the cost but I'm paying it not asking for a handout from taxpayers.
 

Toshi

Harbinger of Doom
Oct 23, 2001
38,420
7,804
Who do you think will pay for the $2.3T shortfall over 10 years that the Trump tax cuts have brought about? It’s a handout to you (and me) from future generations. It’s just disguised a tiny bit so that you buy its lie, hook, line, and sinker.

Source of $2.3T figure, assuming the non-corporate cuts are made permanent: https://www.thebalance.com/cost-of-trump-tax-cuts-4586645
 

stoney

Part of the unwashed, middle-American horde
Jul 26, 2006
21,659
7,331
Colorado
Who do you think will pay for the $2.3T shortfall over 10 years that the Trump tax cuts have brought about? It’s a handout to you (and me) from future generations. It’s just disguised a tiny bit so that you buy its lie, hook, line, and sinker.

Source of $2.3T figure, assuming the non-corporate cuts are made permanent: https://www.thebalance.com/cost-of-trump-tax-cuts-4586645
It's not even that. It's still a draw by the boomers it'll benefit us slightly, but it'll really benefit them. And of course really wealthy people and corporations which are one in the same.
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,351
5,100
Ottawa, Canada

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,351
5,100
Ottawa, Canada
You jest, but type 2 DM and obesity are more prevalent in the poor. Fasting would actually do their metabolisms a favor.
The only reason I brought it up is because of the studies you posted in your thread (which I need to take the time to read properly, because I am very intrigued).

But it all seriousness, I also wondered what your thoughts were on this study. It seems clear to me that this is a "correlation" study, and since correlation /= causation, much more research is needed to determine any causal factors. But i have to imagine that stress brought on by economic precarity has to play a huge role in lifestyle choices and mortality.
 

Toshi

Harbinger of Doom
Oct 23, 2001
38,420
7,804
The only reason I brought it up is because of the studies you posted in your thread (which I need to take the time to read properly, because I am very intrigued).

But it all seriousness, I also wondered what your thoughts were on this study. It seems clear to me that this is a "correlation" study, and since correlation /= causation, much more research is needed to determine any causal factors. But i have to imagine that stress brought on by economic precarity has to play a huge role in lifestyle choices and mortality.
Looking at etable 4 from the JAMA paper on mortality, many of those causes are likely related to smoking or diabetes.
 

stoney

Part of the unwashed, middle-American horde
Jul 26, 2006
21,659
7,331
Colorado
I just had somebody tell me that they they think the Trump will audit and nationalize the Fed, then revoke the US dollar as a fiat currency going back to the gold standard.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
54,511
20,306
Sleazattle

Pesqueeb

bicycle in airplane hangar
Feb 2, 2007
40,381
16,870
Riding the baggage carousel.
Look at that stock market!!!


What do you think a map of that study might look like? Think there might be some correlation to this one?