Parliament IS the house of Lords....and thanks, but I already know that...
The First Debate
- Thread starter Straya
- Start date
Except for the power to dismiss parliament.
Thanks for the legislative history of England
by the way, I hold dual citizenship for both the UK, and the U.S, so don't portend to school me on how it works in England.
Why not stick to what we are talking about...McCain whipped your boys ass!!
by the way, I hold dual citizenship for both the UK, and the U.S, so don't portend to school me on how it works in England.
Why not stick to what we are talking about...McCain whipped your boys ass!!
123456
McCain won the debate by an immeasurably large margin imo.
jeesus h christ get a freakin grip!
amazing, amazing
It as if in his mind there exists a black hole from which no reason or logic can escape.
por·tend /pɔrˈtɛnd, poʊr-/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[pawr-tend, pohr-] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–verb (used with object)
1. to indicate in advance; to foreshadow or presage, as an omen does: The street incident may portend a general uprising.
2. to signify; mean.
–verb (used with object)
1. to indicate in advance; to foreshadow or presage, as an omen does: The street incident may portend a general uprising.
2. to signify; mean.
WTF?
Are you daft? Did you **** out the very last of your brain cells after that last bucket of chicken? Jesustittyfvckingchrist. Bring back stinkle...at least he's fun.
Ahmadinejad is about as powerful as the Mayor of Wasilia...sorry hoss.
it isn't used correctly, hth
YEP, thats exactly right, and it has not escaped me that your boy got his ass handed to him....
so much for NObama foreign policy skills...
I hope for your sake, he fairs better next time, because based on this, he has lost. IMNSHO
it certainly was...
hahaha..I suppose your right...my apologies
the black hole also seems to suck up definitions
So pretty much a draw then. Both sides have strong and weak points but no real telling blows
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7638435.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7638435.stm
I agree but I think both of them lacked a little intuition and stepped outside their game plan. Like McCain who kept talking about pork barrel spending when there is clearly more important financial concerns in Washington and Obama not calling him out.
Obama's got a little bit of Kerry in him, in that he is too focused on truth and accuracy (god forbid). He needs to be willing to discard/ignore lies and defamation and just stay on the offensive with the wealth of simple statements he can make that would leave McCain look like a bumbling, flip-flopping, war-maongering, ill-tempered, misguided old fool.
I'd say Obama nailed him on economy, but got beaten (by silly but effective) tactics on foreign policy. Would be a draw, except foreign policy was the second half. McCain may walk away with a slight bump, but not significant enough to worry the Obama campaign yet.
I'd say Obama nailed him on economy, but got beaten (by silly but effective) tactics on foreign policy. Would be a draw, except foreign policy was the second half. McCain may walk away with a slight bump, but not significant enough to worry the Obama campaign yet.
Well there certainly is that, and the fact that he has had to deal with several different administrations directly.....and won't pander to either party if he feels they are wrong.
I suppose it's cool though, to throw some green, wet behind the ears person with highly suspect ties to former domestic terrorists, and American hating pastors, who know how to work the Hollywood cocktail circuit.
Yeah, he should defiently be the next P.O.T.U.S.
Best line of the debate...
"It's hard to reach across the aisle from that far left"-John S McCain
Then you'd be wrong my friend. I say neither got the economy down at all....and both were cautioned by the narrator with the regards to that as neither could give a straight answer.....therefore that was a toss up AFAIC....
so you voted for Kerry last time, eh?
You are kidding right? If not, here is the short answer: HELL NO!
At first I thought you were talking about Palin.
Not that it does any good to ask, but would you please elaborate on these terrorist ties that you claim Obama has ?
And If you cannot back up these comments then please stop posting.
You sure aren't doing anything to dispel the common belief around here that most republicans are idiots.
Since Bush is a stuttering dolt... nevermind.
His middle name is "Hussen," WTF more proof do you need?
His middle name is "Hussen," WTF more proof do you need?
Thanks, but no thanks. I can speak for myself....
two words...William Ayers, former? domestic terrorist.
And if Mr the one did not prove to you he that he is one as well last night, than you need to remove the blinders....
Two words, that's quite an elaboration.
considering that Mr. the one doesn't feel the need to elaborate, why should I. Repeated calls for him to do so have gone un-answered.
I'm asking you to elaborate.
Just back up one of your ridiculous " sound bite " accusations with solid verifiable proof. This should be fairly easy to accomplish if there is the slightest shred of truth and accuracy in your statements.
here then, chew on this...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/25/inside-politics-92282970/
now, will you please elaborate yourself?
That is what you consider a credible news source ?
The Washington Times was founded by the Unification Church, which as you know, was founded by Sun Myung Moon, who is regarded by many people as a cult leader.
This only serves to further illustrate the fact that you are a blind follower and incapable of thinking for yourself.
Although entertaining to a degree, arguing with you is at best just that, mild entertainment. Not only is a rational discussion with you impossible, but no new input or ideas can be gained.
You are capable of nothing more than reiterating the ideologies, comments and false information of others. You are guilty of what you accuse other RM members of.
I can obtain no knowledge from you, good day.