dudeI keep clicking on this thread looking for a meter that measures my fucking power but all you dwids just keep blabbing about bikes n shit.
Can you add Puerto Rico or Guam for 100,000 feet?Wife and I spent the last year making most of our indoor rides be an alphabetical tour of each of the 50 states.
Wyoming finished our 50th state today.
Grand totals: 69h10m22s, 1004miles, 96353ft
I'm not the only one.dude
THE FUCKING POWER METER THREAD
here. compare your freakin ftps and heart rates and MAXXXXIMUM WATTAGESSSSSSS and $1000 bougie pedals here, you training-loving nerdz!ridemonkey.bikemag.com
I did consider adding on territories, but then decided I'd rather rest that challenge for a while and ride random places. Plus it's hard to find video rides on some of the smaller locations, e.g. Guam and have them be worthwhile if they do exist.Can you add Puerto Rico or Guam for 100,000 feet?
Hm... kind of intrigued by this. I have an Edge 510 that works perfectly fine to the best of my knowledge... but this is a nice price on a little upgrade.Was somebody looking for a cheap garmin the other day?
Garmin Edge 520 Plus: Black | Accessories | Garmin | PlanetCyclery.com
Garmin Edge 520 Plus: Black This cycling computer features advanced navigation and challenges built right in, not to mention a bright color screen, preloaded Strava Live Segments and the Garmin Cycle Map with turn-by-turn directions. Whether you’re explplanetcyclery.com
Might not be a bad way to go.
Save your avocados and find a deal on a 530.Hm... kind of intrigued by this. I have an Edge 510 that works perfectly fine to the best of my knowledge... but this is a nice price on a little upgrade.
I agree, I really like the 530. Was one of the few items I didn't cheap out on (onyx hubs being another). I don't remember exactly what the upgrades were over the 520, but the rainmaker review had me convinced that this was the way to go.Save your avocados and find a deal on a 530.
See the bullet list for improvements in the 530 over the 520plus, battery life alone would make me go that way. I really like the climbpro feature.
Garmin Edge 530 Cycling GPS In-Depth Review
Today Garmin announced three new products, the Edge 530 (this review), the Edge 830 (that review), and new dual ANT+/Bluetooth Smart Speed and Cadence sensors (that review coming up momentarily). These products effectively complete Garmin's x30 lineup of higher-end cyclingwww.dcrainmaker.com
That seems like an overwhelming number of dataSave your avocados and find a deal on a 530.
See the bullet list for improvements in the 530 over the 520plus, battery life alone would make me go that way. I really like the climbpro feature.
Garmin Edge 530 Cycling GPS In-Depth Review
Today Garmin announced three new products, the Edge 530 (this review), the Edge 830 (that review), and new dual ANT+/Bluetooth Smart Speed and Cadence sensors (that review coming up momentarily). These products effectively complete Garmin's x30 lineup of higher-end cyclingwww.dcrainmaker.com
Do you mean difficult? Because it seems like you meant difficult.That was hard
it was hard for about 45 minutesDo you mean difficult? Because it seems like you meant difficult.
So was it hard or did it not extend?it was hard for about 45 minutes
thankfully did not extend for more than 4 hours
it was a suitable hardness and duration to satisfy my goalsSo was it hard or did it not extend?
That's probably not good. One dude I follow on Twitter used to run like that consistently and now has atherosclerotic disease that he really shouldn't have given age and otherwise fitness.question for you fitb0is
I went for a run yesterday with my HR strap on for the first time basically ever. It was a reasonable run, not fast but I am not a runner. My HR climbed to 180 and then settled at 172 for the duration of the workout. My RHR is like 49 and my max is 188, so this was pretty maxed out. This is the second run I've done in about a year, so my body isn't really accustomed to it. My question is, how bad is it that I was in the threshold HRZ for the duration of my relatively casual 2mi run?
i would say part of it is that your body isn't currently conditioned for running.question for you fitb0is
I went for a run yesterday with my HR strap on for the first time basically ever. It was a reasonable run, not fast but I am not a runner. My HR climbed to 180 and then settled at 172 for the duration of the workout. My RHR is like 49 and my max is 188, so this was pretty maxed out. This is the second run I've done in about a year, so my body isn't really accustomed to it. My question is, how bad is it that I was in the threshold HRZ for the duration of my relatively casual 2mi run?
So @Toshi can I get your opinion on this; shitty day and wash up:
Already tired, I got up, sorted kids and went to work. Had a double espresso and a very small Danish for breakfast (normally have a far healthier one). Worked pretty hard (desk job, mental load, bitty, multithreaded, more stressful than ‘normal’). Was so busy didn’t have lunch. Had to run kids around all evening so sort of missed dinner, had a bowl of crappy 2 min noodles with hard boiled egg and a bit of capsicum. Finally to ‘destress’ had a really hot bath (hotter than intended), with a couple of beers, heart was noticeably pounding. Measured 120 bpm. Hyperventilated a bit, held breath for 2:30, heart went to 116. Expected? Normal resting is around 60. Have always had slightly higher resting heart rate than average even when ‘very fit’. Blood pressure is borderline bottom end of hypertension, but docs say ‘OK’.
Yes to sodium, no to nitrates.Was said bowl of crappy noodles the kind that comes with a bucket of sodium and nitrates?
The Apple Watch is approved for detection of a fib but nothing else, plus is just a single electrode by virtue of its design. There are many other possible things to check for, so I wouldn't rely on just that.Thanks Toshi. Are any of those app or watch based ECG analysis things any good or is this a ‘Leave it to the Pros’ type deal?