That's badass@lobsterCT Bike Fab Supply has some 7005 tubing but not the rest. I don’t know enough about it but I have a bunch of engineers around me that I can ask for you if you’d like.
I made a band saw table out of some scrap with inspiration from @bullcrew ’s double hitch mount moto racks on his Jeep builds. It can be stored directly below the workbench when not in use and is held together with two bolts so it’s easy to take the saw out there if needed. This thing eats through metal so much faster than my old one. Very happy with it! To the right are some new bits for my next build. That piece of 4130 tube for my main pivots was not easy to find and it just ate my 17mm drill bit…. Hard steel and a cheap soft drill bit…..
View attachment 169613
View attachment 169614
Great! Go for it.Hi guys, I enjoyed reading all 7 pages this evening, as I have the same ambition; make my own, steel frame. I just ordered the ideas2cycles fitting kit to start making a frame jig. Lots of learning still to do on tig-welding, but it's all about the journey, not the destination. I hope you don't mind if I drop in from time to time with stupid questions….
Anyway, do continue sharing your projects! It's much appreciate.
Marcel
Jody does some nice videos! Thanks for that.I think Weld Mold is a stainless rod or a mix from what people say. If you watch Welding tips and tricks when he is welding a frame. Jody says it flows like stainless rod.
I have sorta asked this before but I still don't really get how people cream their jeans over a coil sprung fork which has a linear spring rate but a SP bike with a linear rate at the back end is bad, why is that? Surely if you can control the front end well enough using HBO you should be able to do the same in the back, or does compressing the air inside a fork make it somewhat progressive?Without a link on the shock you couldn’t make it too progressive.
@lobsterCT You are way above me on the math part. I used Linkage or worked with engineers and could have things calculated for me. Saying that here’s my take.
2.53 to 2.46 is very linear. If you are starting at 2.5 then I would want to finish at 2. Below 2 can create a deep stroke rebound hang up.
If it were me, I would want a starting leverage ratio anywhere from 2.9 to 3.5 more or less and finishing around 2 to 2.5 more or less. This is for natural terrain DH stuff with a 75mm stroke shock, btw.
I would have troubles with your curve, I suspect with balancing traction and bottom out. I would want to have more rising rate to leave me some room for fine tuning. In my experience, 2.5 isn’t very supple off of the top if you have any compression going on and finishing at 2.4 isn’t enough of a change to prevent bottom out unless you are over sprung (or have a progressive spring extreme hbo circuit)and compromising on beginning stroke sensitivity. Unless you do a shock tunnel on the down tube then I can’t see you getting a lot of progression with out a linkage.
It would be impossible to make your frame too progressive due to the single pivot design so I would go as far as you can because packaging limits you. I think you couldn’t get above 10%. A shock with progressive damping and a nice bottom out bumper will compliment that design too. I’m thinking EXT and Ohlins could work. Maybe a trunion mounted shock could help get more progression because it is shorter i2i. Linkage is really easy for a single pivot.
One reason is that linear coil forks aren't really linear, there is still an air spring ramping up in there.I have sorta asked this before but I still don't really get how people cream their jeans over a coil sprung fork which has a linear spring rate but a SP bike with a linear rate at the back end is bad, why is that? Surely if you can control the front end well enough using HBO you should be able to do the same in the back, or does compressing the air inside a fork make it somewhat progressive?
Sorry for the slight derail.
I have only done a handful of hours on dual sus bikes so I have no real idea what makes a good or bad one.
From what I understand, the tig rod that I am using is not as good as the ER70s-2 because I am not back purging the frame with Argon. It looks like it is a more stable rod regarding contamination and will have better quality welds without back purging. I think it makes it easier to get good welds without holes and contamination if I understood correctly. A framebuilding friend gave me two rods but I forgot to ask what they were. They seem to work nice but I don’t know what I am doing…. I wonder if Ceeway has anything?Nice to see the progress! Also in the design.
I'm still waiting for the jig cones to arrive from Ideas2cycles, but I did receive this set of Stella Bianca files. Once the temperature in my shed get better I'll try mastering the art of coping.
I do have questions about the welding rods. I read that a lot of people use Weldmold 880, Er70s-2 and 312i. I live in the Netherlands and it doesn't look like these are readily available here. And the thinnest rods I can purchase are 1.6 mm, whereas I read most are using 0.035” (0,9 mm). Where do you guys get the “good stuff”? Buying from US gets expensive quite quickly due to shipping. I see buckoW also used different (and thicker) rods, but I'd like to take that compromise out of the equation and start with the correct (?) rods. Any pointers to suppliers in Europe are very welcome.
I will start practicing my welds with slightly thicker tubes and 1.6 rods first, so I'm not in a hurry getting the right ones, but would like to slowly gather all materials over the coming months.