how am i bigoted?
exactly?
you know that bigoted *does not* mean: "anyone who disagrees with me", right?
The "I Have Zero Faith In Humanity" Thread
- Thread starter H8R
- Start date
-
- Tags
- avocados are bears
exactly?
you know that bigoted *does not* mean: "anyone who disagrees with me", right?
Give us a break, there's years of posts here to elucidate that.
i'm only asking you; quit hiding behind others
and since there's "years of posts", it should be trivial to produce one that demonstrates i'm bigoted in a manner that's germane to this discussion. i can point to the whole 'explaining religious psychosis' thread as just one set of examples of yours, just in case you lack the ability or willingness to navel-gaze
You've made numerous racist posts, not homophobic ones. Discrimination against gays isn't any more acceptable or legal than discrimination against minorities or women.
And my thread isn't debunking any one faith, you know, discrimination.
You do realize discrimination is single out something, right? Christian nutjobs don't appreciate that, but they're fine if it's some other faith instead.So debunking something is taken as discriminatory?
Last edited:
yes, i have made many posts against white/brown/yellow/orange/chartreuse people, but b/c they're positively crackers, not b/c of the melanin content of their pigment. it's no more bigoted (specifically sexist & racist) to say as a portion of the population, white males are the most highly represented demographic for serial killers, or for corporate raiding, or political corruption.
you are bigoted against anyone who believes in an All Mighty, regardless of faith. your bigotry is far from discerning, and is only matched by your malevolence & condescension for anyone who dares to express their faith, however far from any specific denomination. curiously, you are quiet as a church mouse on the world's 2nd biggest religion.
You've agreed I am not singling out faiths and have several times included polytheism even. As crab notes, debunking is not discriminatory. Nor is it bigoted - science offers the current, best supported, unbiased description of reality - not a judgement based on personal feelings or works of fiction from an age of greater ignorance.
Last edited:
and nor do i single out -- or, discriminate -- against what kinds of men aren't allowed in women's rooms; they ALL are
and what is it you think you debunked (or provided the final word on)? there is no god? or that one cannot both be of sound mind & hold fast to a belief in an all mighty?
so let's put this to rest (like there's really a chance of that!): if you knew only 1 thing about someone, and were considering them for a position of influence (political office, judge, or head of faculty at a public uni or other school system), would it be enough information for you to make a decision solely upon whether or not they held a religious belief? not a trick question; be pleased if you didn't treat it as one.
and what is it you think you debunked (or provided the final word on)? there is no god? or that one cannot both be of sound mind & hold fast to a belief in an all mighty?
so let's put this to rest (like there's really a chance of that!): if you knew only 1 thing about someone, and were considering them for a position of influence (political office, judge, or head of faculty at a public uni or other school system), would it be enough information for you to make a decision solely upon whether or not they held a religious belief? not a trick question; be pleased if you didn't treat it as one.
You've made specific remarks against minorities, I am not talking about white people or men in women's rooms.
You can't make a decision based on their religious status and I noted in the thread I agreed with silver, most are not true believers and there's herd/social reasons.
I also stated early on in that thread it was a beneficial adaptation (especially in the age of ignorance in which they were invented):
http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=243519&p=3656957&viewfull=1#post3656957
You can't make a decision based on their religious status and I noted in the thread I agreed with silver, most are not true believers and there's herd/social reasons.
I also stated early on in that thread it was a beneficial adaptation (especially in the age of ignorance in which they were invented):
http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/showthread.php?t=243519&p=3656957&viewfull=1#post3656957
- From the dictionary on my computer which is probably skewed towards the liberal side since it's a Mac.
And from Wikipedia :
Hmmmmm...
God damn, I still can't get over how creepy that dude was. So relieved that Vader tossed him down the Death Star exhaust port.
http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/03/freedom-after-30-years-on-death-row/284179/
humanity restored? just for one day?
humanity restored? just for one day?
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2014/03/20/rush-limbaugh-childrens-book-selection-causes-a-stir/?hpt=hp_t3
It distresses me to no end that there are parents out there who would inflict this on their children...
It distresses me to no end that there are parents out there who would inflict this on their children...
i'm amazed he can read, yet alone write
Iseriously doubt his oxycontin riddled ass wrote ANY of it...
We have a children's book written by Lynne Cheney somewhere in our house.
Hopefully next time the realize it's him and just leave him to let god sort it out.
http://www.richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2014/3/16/man-saved-from-submerged-car-credits-god-s-grace-for-the-rescue-and-prepares-to-sue-his-first-responders
http://www.richarddawkins.net/news_articles/2014/3/16/man-saved-from-submerged-car-credits-god-s-grace-for-the-rescue-and-prepares-to-sue-his-first-responders
Ironically I hope...
It was a "gift", from whom, I can't rightly recall, but I'm sure it was a jab of some kind. I received a "Duck Dynasty" plastic tumbler last Christmas, that I know was meant that way. I suspect the book might have come from the same people.
I wish I had 2 of Rushs' books...I would sh!t on 1 and cover it up with the other...
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2014/03/22/vandals-targeting-flood-damaged-homes-in-lyons/
1: flood
2: looted
3: vandalized
#learnToSwim
1: flood
2: looted
3: vandalized
#learnToSwim
I saw that yesterday. Seriously fvck that guy, his lawyer, the judge, and everyone else involved. Sounds like another case of "affluenza". Saw this quote in another article:
Can we all agree that this doesn't get to be a thing? Being rich shouldn't excuse you from common decency and morality. It's not the fvcking flu.
Oh but it does.........
And in the same vein
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/4/2/supreme-court-strikesdownaggregatecampaigndonationcaps.html
Day #__ of rome falling.
LOL @ The Montgomery Burns-esque picture of Sheldon Adelson hunched and rubbing his hands together on the sidebar. Coincidence? I think not.
Naw, the old fvck just needs to rest his hands on his cane to do the "Burns"
Must be tiring lugging that wallet around.
Must be tiring lugging that wallet around.
The man has a point, though. I used to bitch to my ex about her not locking up her gun, even after she got a FREE GUN LOCK at the gun show. I have compassion, it's just thin when the stupid gets thick.I have zero faith in humanity because there is no compassion left. No matter the crime, people start calling for heads. Let's execute them!!!
This.
I have no response to that...