http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/next/2001779799_nextlimitvote02.html
Ok....only the first paragraph or two of this article has to do with my point.
Election day just passed here in Seattle, and this question has been bugging me for a while. I'm not sure I agree with the whole "initiative" thing.
Basically any ol' someone can get it into his head that...say, all citizens be required to hop on one foot wherever they go. So he can got get a form, have a bunch of people sign a petition that agree that this would be a great idea and then it makes it on the ballot as intiative "I-123". Then everyone gets to vote yay or nay.
This is what happened with I-695 a few years ago. This guy decided that car license fees where too high. So he got I-695 going which said that car tabs should be a flat $30 fee. It made it on the ballot, and sure enough it passed. Now are car tabs are dirt cheap. Hooray!
Of course then the gov't was left struggling to make up for the lost income and was forced to cut other stuff.
But this was a high profile thing. It was on the news every day, and everyone knew what it was.
However there are TONS of other initiatives that people are expected to vote on, and no-one has any idea what they are about. And as a result, I know for a fact that a lot of people don't even bother to vote because they can't be bothered to research each initiative. And really, who would have time for all that? Shouldn't there be people whose job it is to know what all this is about?
Enter the parlimentary system.
We commonwealth folk, elect members of parliment to bring up these "initiatives" and vote on them for us, as our representatives. Now some would argue that this takes away peoples' right to have a voice and all that.
But on the other hand do you really want to know Cletus the circus freak has to say....or letting people randomly vote yes or no on something they aren't completely informed on?
I-695 was a great example. Of course paying $30 for your tabs instead of $600 is attractive. That's as far as most people think..."Uh huhuhuhh....yeah....$30 is better".... but there were consequences that I'm sure many laypersons (lay people?) didn't consider
So, are these things better left to elected representatives? It worked well for the Romans...
Ok....only the first paragraph or two of this article has to do with my point.
Election day just passed here in Seattle, and this question has been bugging me for a while. I'm not sure I agree with the whole "initiative" thing.
Basically any ol' someone can get it into his head that...say, all citizens be required to hop on one foot wherever they go. So he can got get a form, have a bunch of people sign a petition that agree that this would be a great idea and then it makes it on the ballot as intiative "I-123". Then everyone gets to vote yay or nay.
This is what happened with I-695 a few years ago. This guy decided that car license fees where too high. So he got I-695 going which said that car tabs should be a flat $30 fee. It made it on the ballot, and sure enough it passed. Now are car tabs are dirt cheap. Hooray!
Of course then the gov't was left struggling to make up for the lost income and was forced to cut other stuff.
But this was a high profile thing. It was on the news every day, and everyone knew what it was.
However there are TONS of other initiatives that people are expected to vote on, and no-one has any idea what they are about. And as a result, I know for a fact that a lot of people don't even bother to vote because they can't be bothered to research each initiative. And really, who would have time for all that? Shouldn't there be people whose job it is to know what all this is about?
Enter the parlimentary system.
We commonwealth folk, elect members of parliment to bring up these "initiatives" and vote on them for us, as our representatives. Now some would argue that this takes away peoples' right to have a voice and all that.
But on the other hand do you really want to know Cletus the circus freak has to say....or letting people randomly vote yes or no on something they aren't completely informed on?
I-695 was a great example. Of course paying $30 for your tabs instead of $600 is attractive. That's as far as most people think..."Uh huhuhuhh....yeah....$30 is better".... but there were consequences that I'm sure many laypersons (lay people?) didn't consider
So, are these things better left to elected representatives? It worked well for the Romans...