Coyotes provide outside cat population control around here.I hate bad cat owners, my neighbours leave their cats outside all day and for much of the night.
One of the little fuckers just killed another bird, hoping that an owl or a snake will take the cats out at some point. There was a carpet python in the creek that could probably swallow a cat, I'll pray to Jeebus that it happens.
I hope whoever decided to put sour cream in squeeze bottles was able to retire on it.
This miracle of innovation also recently entered my life and I can't believe no one thought of it sooner.I hope whoever decided to put sour cream in squeeze bottles was able to retire on it.
This is my entire life story with sour cream until I discovered the squeeze pouch.Amen. Was forced to get it in an old school tub recently and more goes flying across the kitchen trying to shake it off if the spoon.
I'm pretty sure the Mexicans have been doing it for ages, haven't they?This miracle of innovation also recently entered my life and I can't believe no one thought of it sooner.
C'est francais. Singular and plural of 'prize' is prix.1 Grand Prix, 2 Grands Prix? Why not Grand Prixs? Prixies? Not sure but it doesn't sound right.
That’s because it was probably sent in a fast packet, and not in a container ship.Current events makes no sense, Go to store, want to buy X, they say its a supply chain problem overseas, cant get it, ordering will takes weeks, to months, order on my phone from overseas, arrives in 4 days.
That doesn't make it sound any better. 2 Grands prize vs 2 Grand Prizes? It's 2 prizes, not 2 Grands, the prizes are grand, not the other way around.C'est francais. Singular and plural of 'prize' is prix.
'Grand' vs. 'Grands' seems to apply to the start of F1 having a Constructors Championship - much like TDF having King of the Mountains (Polka Dot Jersey), Most Points (Green Jersey), Fastest AM (White Jersey) and Leaders (Yellow Jersey).That doesn't make it sound any better. 2 Grands prize vs 2 Grand Prizes? It's 2 prizes, not 2 Grands, the prizes are grand, not the other way around.
this is how mayonnaise is sold in Chile. Seemed so weird to see squeeze bags of it on the shelf, but it makes so much more sense than the plastic jars we have here. If only from the usage perspective, let alone the reduction in waste.This is my entire life story with sour cream until I discovered the squeeze pouch.
@Pesqueeb upon discovery of the squeeze pouch glory I felt a mixture of joy and confusion for not having considered such a simple and effective method of dispensing sour cream.
That’s just how French grammar works. hrug:That doesn't make it sound any better. 2 Grands prize vs 2 Grand Prizes? It's 2 prizes, not 2 Grands, the prizes are grand, not the other way around.
I am not sure if the squeeze bottle has a distinct advantage over the Jar. You still have to use a knife to spread the mayo on the bread or mix the Tuna.this is how mayonnaise is sold in Chile. Seemed so weird to see squeeze bags of it on the shelf, but it makes so much more sense than the plastic jars we have here. If only from the usage perspective, let alone the reduction in waste.
How many times have you wound up with mayo on your shirt sleeve because you were trying to get that last little bit down in the corner? Me neither. Well, maybe once or twice in my life.I am not sure if the squeeze bottle has a distinct advantage over the Jar. You still have to use a knife to spread the mayo on the bread or mix the Tuna.
The squeeze bottle allows you to get the product out without introducing a foreign object into the product, which avoids potential contamination of the product.I am not sure if the squeeze bottle has a distinct advantage over the Jar. You still have to use a knife to spread the mayo on the bread or mix the Tuna.
I usually don't lick the knife I just lifted from the drawer before I insert it into the container. I think I have mastered washing dishes and cutlery. Not to mention that the top of the squeeze bottle gets nasty after use also. Every time you squeeze product out, it gets contaminated upon exit of the bottle does it not?The squeeze bottle allows you to get the product out without introducing a foreign object into the product, which avoids potential contamination of the product.
Valid points. The real question is how contaminated the knife gets in the drawer and from handling vs. the things growing in the squeeze spout. Big picture, it’s all pretty negligible when you consider the preservatives and the general nature of squeezable food products.I usually don't lick the knife I just lifted from the drawer before I insert it into the container. I think I have mastered washing dishes and cutlery. Not to mention that the top of the squeeze bottle gets nasty after use also. Every time you squeeze product out, it gets contaminated upon exit of the bottle does it not?
There's also the fact that, aside from crap like COVID-19, ingesting some quantity of dirt and gook ain't a bad thing, it keeps our immune defense systems up and working. Practices associated with the 20th century medical myth of asepsis did not make people healthier overall.Valid points. The real question is how contaminated the knife gets in the drawer and from handling vs. the things growing in the squeeze spout. Big picture, it’s all pretty negligible when you consider the preservatives and the general nature of squeezable food products.
I usually don't lick the knife I just lifted from the drawer before I insert it into the container. I think I have mastered washing dishes and cutlery. Not to mention that the top of the squeeze bottle gets nasty after use also. Every time you squeeze product out, it gets contaminated upon exit of the bottle does it not?
and then there's people with kids.Valid points. The real question is how contaminated the knife gets in the drawer and from handling vs. the things growing in the squeeze spout. Big picture, it’s all pretty negligible when you consider the preservatives and the general nature of squeezable food products.
Have you read Sapiens?An argument in various recent readings is that the concept of wilderness is a conflation, that wilderness as an area on the earth unaffected and unaltered by humans does not exist. In general, the argument seems to be applied to the “United” States, and specifically to the belief by invading Europeans that the land they were populating by force was “wild”, had not been altered by humans, whereas, across the continent, large areas had been for millennia been altered by travel, by agriculture, by burning of forest understories, by hunting, and by construction of cities, roadways, artwork, and monuments.
Forest understory, left to itself, often nears impassibility due to vegetation (today, laurel, multiflora rose, dense stands of saplings, fallen boles…). Prior to the evolution of the human species, other moving animals created pathways through such terrain; whether these would have transformed “wilderness” into something else might be pondered. This was happening long, long before anything vaguely similar to humans had evolved.
We could argue that something describable as wilderness in fact has existed prior to the industrial revolution and its effects upon the atmosphere and the oceans. Life as we define it originated four or more billion years ago, terrestrial invertebrates 430 million years ago, forests 370 million years ago, stone tools attributable to upright apes began to appear roughly two and a half million years ago.
Let’s say that the human species became worldwide by about 20,000 years ago, and as a hypothesis, that any true “wilderness” ceased to exist as large mammalian species were driven extinct and pathways became more dominated by bipedal traffic than by “wildlife”. We’ll allow the industrial revolution, triggering global warming, to occur at 1800, which is essentially now. Hence, wilderness in any meaningful sense ceased to exist at the point at which our species had diffused worldwide and begun significant alteration of plants, animals, and the landscape.