Quantcast

The worst good component you've purchased

trib

not worthy of a Rux.
Jun 22, 2009
1,478
421
Having been riding mountain bikes for a while I've purchased my fair share of parts which promised superior performance and at the time kind of delivered it, but with hindsight were absolute shite. Getting ready to buy a new bike with all the bells and whistles I can't help but think how time will reflect on what is supposedly the best technology available.

Whilst bikes now are for the first time, actually quite good I thought I'd ask about which parts you guys have saved for and lusted after just to bolt on and find terrible.

My particular favourite was a Magura HS33. The old chameleon didn't have disk mounts and I assumed a bright yellow german hydraulic rim brake would be the next best thing. Unfortunately, a greasy rim is never going to brake well, leading to locked up rear wheels in the wet and only marginally better performance in the dry. Of course I couldn't admit that at the time, only now can I admit how woeful the yellow beast was. I suppose it worked better than any of the front forks I had at the time.

So, let it out, which parts did you buy and suffer through? This is a safe place, no one will judge you for thinking a 100mm flex stem was a suitable purchase.
 

TrumbullHucker

trumbullruxer
Aug 29, 2005
2,284
719
shimzbury, ct
right when i threw my leg over my brand new 26" un-shimmable VPP sunburnt carbon bike i knew i made a big mistake. it crumbled beneath my feet and my friends refused to be seen with me and i was kicked out of the bike park!


in all seriousness, i dont think i have bought an 'instantly shitty' component. alot of personal preference stuff (vivid>rc4.... easton havoc 35mm bars > chromag fubar osx 31.8mm bars) but thankfully nothing that broke/bent on the first or second run..
elixers were fukking terrible though
 

dump

Turbo Monkey
Oct 12, 2001
8,212
4,462
e13 xc crank. After having great success with the e13 DH crank, the XC requires tightening every few rides. shit was expensive too. I have been riding it for a few years this way - it's annoying but I have an XT ready to bolt up. Why did I stray from tried/true shimano? new e13 is not old dw/jp e13.
 

dump

Turbo Monkey
Oct 12, 2001
8,212
4,462
Still running elixir crs from 2009 - they've been solid. Guess I got a good set.
 

trib

not worthy of a Rux.
Jun 22, 2009
1,478
421
in all seriousness, i dont think i have bought an 'instantly shitty' component. alot of personal preference stuff (vivid>rc4.... easton havoc 35mm bars > chromag fubar osx 31.8mm bars) but thankfully nothing that broke/bent on the first or second run..
elixers were fukking terrible though
That's the thing, most of these parts aren't instantly shitty. When I first got a psylo fork I thought it was the bees knees, compared to the Judy and the Pace RC37 it replaced. When the Psylo got replaced I quickly realised it was flexy, dived under braking and had serious damping issues. Damn Psylo.
 

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
85,847
24,433
media blackout
e13 xc crank. After having great success with the e13 DH crank, the XC requires tightening every few rides. shit was expensive too. I have been riding it for a few years this way - it's annoying but I have an XT ready to bolt up. Why did I stray from tried/true shimano? new e13 is not old dw/jp e13.
are you tightening the e13 cranks to the right torque spec? i had that problem once or twice at first but then i found that they weren't as tight as they should have been. once i busted out the torque wrench on them i haven't had to touch them.
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
1,994
716
Giant AC2. After riding it and figuring out that the adjustable travel was a joke, shitty shifting and crooked disc tabs, I named it the F-pos... Fucking piece of shit.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
54,394
20,185
Sleazattle
Hope mono mini's. Most inconsistent POS I have ever touched. Never knew what was going to happen when I pulled the lever. Sometimes super powerfull and grabby, next time I touched the lever could get nothing.
 

FlipSide

Turbo Monkey
Sep 24, 2001
1,384
818
2013 Fox34 Factory Series: Unacceptably shitty damping for such a modern and expensive fork. It should have been considered a recall-worthy issue, but FOX preferred to ask the unhappy customers to give them even more money to fix the forks. My confidence in them was lower than 0 at that time (it still is) so I decided to pay much more money to PUSH the fork with their bling-bling system that replaces the CTD crap with proper HS/LS compression adjustment. The fork has been amazing since this upgrade.

Apart from that, it may be too early to tell, but I recently bought a set of nice Profile Elite BMX hubs with 204 POE...Super nice, but the freehub drag is not acceptable. I've been told it is normal and they will spin better once they get broken in, but I am starting to find the break-in period to be longer than one might expect. We'll see.
 

gemini2k

Turbo Monkey
Jul 31, 2005
3,526
117
San Francisco
Brand new hadley hub. After ~7 rides on my new megatrail the hub literally felt apart in my hand after I took the rear wheel and cassette off last night. Granted it just needed to be cleaned, regreased and tightened. But still really frustrating and ridiculous for a $300+ 'premium, made in the USA' product.
 

big-ted

Danced with A, attacked by C, fired by D.
Sep 27, 2005
1,400
47
Vancouver, BC
Likewise I had a couple of sets of Elixirs on various bikes that were 100% reliable throughout the 4-5 years I had them. However, they are now completely outclassed in power by more modern brakes.

For me it has to be DT 440 hubs. They're expensive, heavy, don't have spectacular engagement, especially with the 'standard' ring drive pieces, and my goodness they're a royal PITA to rebuild.
 

dump

Turbo Monkey
Oct 12, 2001
8,212
4,462
are you tightening the e13 cranks to the right torque spec? i had that problem once or twice at first but then i found that they weren't as tight as they should have been. once i busted out the torque wrench on them i haven't had to touch them.
Definitely. Have been using a torque wrench from the beginning. They also give a god-aweful creak every now and then. Have emails w/ e13 going back to the first time I had issues with them back in 2012. Same issues continue to today. I've tried everything. Measured my bb shell, adjusted the # of spacers repeatedly, etc. The only recourse is to go through a shop and file a warranty claim. I can't give these things any more of my time. XT is waiting on the shelf. These will go in the bin and save the bb for the other bike.
 

HAB

Chelsea from Seattle
Apr 28, 2007
11,580
2,006
Seattle
For me it has to be DT 440 hubs. They're expensive, heavy, don't have spectacular engagement, especially with the 'standard' ring drive pieces, and my goodness they're a royal PITA to rebuild.
Interesting. I've only owned 240s, but they're light, have held up great, and are easy to work on. What was bad about the 440s?

The engagement isn't anything special, I'll give you that.
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,061
5,970
borcester rhymes
Hmm, recently...

A king hub. Great hub, light, spun well, but even with the fancy engagement and the 72POE, it didn't feel like a significant improvement over the 32pt hub I had before. I guess in the future, anything over 32/36 is fine. I got an onyx hub coming so we'll see if it's the bees knees. There's no doubt that it's a good product, but it was just kind of all hype and not a lot of substance after such a long wait.

Further back...Magura gustavs. They had plenty of power, but the modulation of a light switch. Trying to ride them in the grease was insane, I had to go so slow just to not lock both front and rear wheels and slide into a tree over and over again.
 

trib

not worthy of a Rux.
Jun 22, 2009
1,478
421
i've had a few components over the years that were so bad i straight threw them out, but enough trips to the bong shed have erased them from memory
how many bongs have you bought and then realised that performance didn't match the hype?
 

kickstand

Turbo Monkey
Sep 18, 2009
3,441
392
Fenton, MI
Hmm, recently...

A king hub. Great hub, light, spun well, but even with the fancy engagement and the 72POE, it didn't feel like a significant improvement over the 32pt hub I had before. I guess in the future, anything over 32/36 is fine. I got an onyx hub coming so we'll see if it's the bees knees. There's no doubt that it's a good product, but it was just kind of all hype and not a lot of substance after such a long wait.
what did you not like about it?

what spacing is it?

i have come to really like higher engagement hubs, mostly for the cool sounds and pretty colors.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
54,394
20,185
Sleazattle
Hmm, recently...

A king hub. Great hub, light, spun well, but even with the fancy engagement and the 72POE, it didn't feel like a significant improvement over the 32pt hub I had before. I guess in the future, anything over 32/36 is fine. I got an onyx hub coming so we'll see if it's the bees knees. There's no doubt that it's a good product, but it was just kind of all hype and not a lot of substance after such a long wait.

Further back...Magura gustavs. They had plenty of power, but the modulation of a light switch. Trying to ride them in the grease was insane, I had to go so slow just to not lock both front and rear wheels and slide into a tree over and over again.

The nice thing about King's is that they just last for fucking ever.

I am pretty disappointed in my I9 torch hubs. Freewheel bearing exploded after 6 months. The rest of the bearings are getting crunchy and loose.
 

HAB

Chelsea from Seattle
Apr 28, 2007
11,580
2,006
Seattle
Hans Damph tires. I demoed a bike with them and jesus fucking christ are those things terrible. Maybe if you always ride perfectly perpendicular to the trail they're okay, but at any kind of lean the stupid transition knobs and flimsy side knobs just leave them a squirmy, horrible mess.
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,061
5,970
borcester rhymes
It's not that I didn't like it, it's that it wasn't as impressive as I had made it out to be. It was a decent hub, forreals, but it wasn't like the extra POE allowed me to fly through the clouds and impress kidwoo with geometry numbers.

I've since sold it, and moved on!
 

IH8Rice

I'm Mr. Negative! I Fail!
Aug 2, 2008
24,524
494
Im over here now
How soon before you realised that the Evil was a POS?
one month. it worked great in Morzine for two weeks despite not knowing squat about setting up the RC4 World Cup to the bike. then came the broken flip chip axles that caused me to totally eat shit, then realizing that the frame was aligned by this guy
when trying to install the "revised" flip chips
 

big-ted

Danced with A, attacked by C, fired by D.
Sep 27, 2005
1,400
47
Vancouver, BC
Interesting. I've only owned 240s, but they're light, have held up great, and are easy to work on. What was bad about the 440s?

The engagement isn't anything special, I'll give you that.
You haven't tried to replace the drive-side hub bearing yet, have you?
 

Da Peach

Outwitted by a rodent
Jul 2, 2002
13,683
4,912
North Van
spank spike pedals.

although, it seems they've tweaked the design to allow access to the axle nut now, but they're still running on bushings.
 

kickstand

Turbo Monkey
Sep 18, 2009
3,441
392
Fenton, MI
spank spike pedals.

although, it seems they've tweaked the design to allow access to the axle nut now, but they're still running on bushings.
never owned a set, but the only friend I have who did bent the axle in pretty short order, I've been hesitant on any of their stuff since...