That's pretty cool the way you celebrate the injury of others. Sweet on ya.Originally posted by BurlySurly
Ah hahahahaha!
Hippies....
I could see you believing the injury was justified, but taking pleasure in it? That's pathetic, bro.
That's pretty cool the way you celebrate the injury of others. Sweet on ya.Originally posted by BurlySurly
Ah hahahahaha!
Hippies....
Maybe or maybe not, but she was with a group who has no reguard for the law.Originally posted by -BB-
Yeah... I'm sure she was out there throwing bottles and beating up cops too
Which ones?Originally posted by Brian HCM#1
the law.
Thats not the point, the protesters were ASKED to clear a path for cars/trucks not block, enterances, then abuse was taking on the police force. She was doing something wrong, because when she was asked to leave(as in the whole group) they refused to. That is why force was used and with all the mayhem in San Francisco I sure the police didn't want that BS to happen again. She should have left when she was first asked to. You can't compare this to a stray bullit on a drive by. Unless a car full of gangsters drive up first and ask everyone to leave and say, if they aren't in a gang please leave cause were going to start shooting in a few moments.Originally posted by ohio
edit: and what makes it obvious she took the protesting too far? Because she got shot, she obviously was doing something wrong? That's like saying a victim of a stray bullet in a drive-by obviously deserved what they got, just because they were in a ghetto and knew it was dangerous when they went there.
In this case YES, they were all asked to leave, so apperantly there was a choice to be made.......Get it?Originally posted by ohio
Also, are you implying that guilt by association is alright in your book?
How about being on private property.Originally posted by ohio
Which ones?
I can think of a couple of rights that were being exercised... what laws were being broken?
I believe they were just in front of it. Not on it.Originally posted by Brian HCM#1
How about being on private property.
OK... I'll give you the fact that she was blocking a road and refused to disperse. Do you REALLY think that SHE threw bottles?Originally posted by Damn True
Well let's see.
They were blocking a public road. - illegal
They refused to disperese when told to do so. - illegal
They threw rocks, bottles, bolts and railroad spikes at cops. - illegal
They were blocking delivery of supplies that were headed for our troops. - illegal, morally reprehensible, and tantamount to giving aid and comfor to the enemy
Am I glad this chick took a less-lethal round in the face? No. Was it justified. Yes. Was it by and large her fault? Absolutely.
....hell hath no fury like a woman scornedOriginally posted by Ranger
I have been shot with wax bullets, the baton rounds, the rubber pellets (those REALLY sucked), and been exposed to tear gas and been sprayed with pepper spray.
depending on the size and density of the crowd, leaving may not have been an option. She may not have even been aware of the cops.Originally posted by Damn True
She had the opportunity to leave when the cops told her to do so.
She had the opportunity to leave when the others (if she was not one of them) started assaulting the cops.
She chose none of the above.
The impact on her face is clearly from the front. Which indicates she was not attempting to leave when she got hit. It dosen't take a genius to figure out that she was part of the problem.
Originally posted by Ranger
Servus!
Hate to break it to you but this picture is obviously photoshopped. The shadowing on her cheek is dodged an burned into oblivion and the injuries have serious pixelation around the edges under magnification. To have caused a welt that large would have bruised her severely and easily broken her jaw.
BTW - part of riot control training in the military is having things that you would use against a crowd - used against you.
I have been shot with wax bullets, the baton rounds, the rubber pellets (those REALLY sucked), and been exposed to tear gas and been sprayed with pepper spray.
None of the non-lethal rounds will cause such a wound - I know.
Originally posted by Damn True
Well let's see.
They were blocking a public road. - illegal
They refused to disperese when told to do so. - illegal
They threw rocks, bottles, bolts and railroad spikes at cops. - illegal
They were blocking delivery of supplies that were headed for our troops. - illegal, morally reprehensible, and tantamount to giving aid and comfor to the enemy
Am I glad this chick took a less-lethal round in the face? No. Was it justified. Yes. Was it by and large her fault? Absolutely.
Originally posted by ohio
depending on the size and density of the crowd, leaving may not have been an option. She may not have even been aware of the cops.
The last statement is wrong. The impact is on the side and back of her jowls and neck. Judging from the swelling and scrapes, it glanced the neck, hit on the backside of her jaw, and scraped across the side of it as it ricocheted away. That allows for a multitude of positions, none of which indicate she was facing the police. Much more plausible, she could have been turning to run, or she could have been running and looking back over her shoulder.
edit: I should add I know nothing about ballistics and made all of that up. I just thought it was silly that True thought it was so "clear" that she was facing the cops.
edit 2: PLUS, she's way to cute (minus the unsightly wound) to be "part of the problem." Hot chicks are never part of the problem.
Originally posted by Transcend
Add to that list protesting without a permit.
Originally posted by llkoolkeg
...photoshopped Bush's face onto the original picture, which I just happen to have a copy of:
yes, i am. I have had enough with retarded protestors lately. They deserve everything they get.Originally posted by patconnole
Are you serious?
Originally posted by Transcend
Rubber bullets sound good to me.
Originally posted by N8
...how about Rubber Nipples???
!
oops... Ren & Stimpy flash back...
I feel like some shots could have been fired into the air, or just blank rounds discharged (this may have occured, but I didn't hear anything indicating it). Crowd would have cleared quickly. Civilians puss out and run like scared rabbits at the sound of gunfire. They would have done enough injury to each other, just trampling the crap out of their brethren, that actually shooting them probably would have been redundant.Originally posted by Transcend
Rubber bullets sound good to me.
Although I do agree with you on that one, the point is it isnt a deterrent. Oh they only fired shots into the air, lets go back tomorrow. They have to prove they will use force to get people to understand.Originally posted by ohio
I feel like some shots could have been fired into the air, or just blank rounds discharged (this may have occured, but I didn't hear anything indicating it). Crowd would have cleared quickly. Civilians puss out and run like scared rabbits at the sound of gunfire. They would have done enough injury to each other, just trampling the crap out of their brethren, that actually shooting them probably would have been redundant.
Originally posted by Transcend
Let's be honest, some of those protesters have awful thick heads, and are close to being extremists.
Again... If I were in Critical Mass, and they asked me to go home or get out of the streets, and I didn't, and some guy way in the back threw a bottle, then I deserve to get shot with one of those things?Originally posted by Damn True
Hey, if you don't want to incur the consequences of an action, don't do it or associate yourself with those that do. You are judged by the company you keep. Hence the term "accessory".
Additionaly,
She had the opportunity to not show up that day.
She had the opportunity to leave when the cops told her to do so.
She had the opportunity to leave when the others (if she was not one of them) started assaulting the cops.
She chose none of the above.
The impact on her face is clearly from the front. Which indicates she was not attempting to leave when she got hit. It dosen't take a genius to figure out that she was part of the problem.
In the news-cast they did on this, you see everyone running away from the cops as they continue to pump rounds at them.Originally posted by ohio
depending on the size and density of the crowd, leaving may not have been an option. She may not have even been aware of the cops.
The last statement is wrong. The impact is on the side and back of her jowls and neck. Judging from the swelling and scrapes, it glanced the neck, hit on the backside of her jaw, and scraped across the side of it as it ricocheted away. That allows for a multitude of positions, none of which indicate she was facing the police. Much more plausible, she could have been turning to run, or she could have been running and looking back over her shoulder.
edit: I should add I know nothing about ballistics and made all of that up. I just thought it was silly that True thought it was so "clear" that she was facing the cops.
edit 2: PLUS, she's way to cute (minus the unsightly wound) to be "part of the problem." Hot chicks are never part of the problem.
If you were blocking traffic and important good that needed to be delivered in my city? Hell yes. Critical mass is ILLEGAL. Deal with it.Originally posted by -BB-
Again... If I were in Critical Mass, and they asked me to go home or get out of the streets, and I didn't, and some guy way in the back threw a bottle, then I deserve to get shot with one of those things?
The only reason that you guys are against this girl is because you are against her cause.
You really need to get a clue, she got what she deserved, when you play with fire expect to get burned. She HAD the choice to protest, so in doing that with recent issues with protestors I'm sure she knew the possible concequenses. I'm glad to see your in full support of our troops. I have several friend in law enforcement, and you should see the BS they have to deal with in todays society, it would blow your minds if you heard the non tree hugger news side of the story. They never say what drove them to that point. I'm not saying all police are perfect angles, but you wouldn't believe the BS they have to put up with.Originally posted by scofflaw23
i agree with ohio, regardless of the reason why, it's sick and twisted to revel in someone else's pain. sound like Brian HCM and Burly Surly would fit in real well with the torturers in Saddam Hussein's secret police. you both really make me sick. you cry freedom and then commend the actions of a police state.
ben.
If you were asked to leave and didn't because of your cause? Then yes, you are fair game.Originally posted by -BB-
Again... If I were in Critical Mass, and they asked me to go home or get out of the streets, and I didn't, and some guy way in the back threw a bottle, then I deserve to get shot with one of those things?
:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:Originally posted by pnj
don't look now but I think there is a hippy or two among us.....
Where is our freedom to assemble then?Originally posted by Brian HCM#1
If you were asked to leave and didn't because of your cause? Then yes, you are fair game.
I don't care about the protestors, just please don't stop me or slow me down with the things I'm doing. If a group wants to protest in an orderly fashon, not cause traffic congestion or riot, then who cares. And yes it did piss me off to read that.Originally posted by -BB-
Where is our freedom to assemble then?
Isn't it a constitutional right?
How do you feel about this:
http://www.my-homeschooling-place.com/forums/politics/posts/99.html
Bet it pisses you off, huh?
SO we are free to assemble as long as we are doing it in a PRO-government way? But as soon as you start to critisize, then your rights are gone?
You should change your RM name to "Hippie dude in training"Originally posted by -BB-
Man... I never thought I was a Hippie, but compared to a lot of you, I guess I am!!
Exactly!!Originally posted by Brian HCM#1
I don't care about the protestors, just please don't stop me or slow me down with the things I'm doing. If a group wants to protest in an orderly fashon, not cause traffic congestion or riot, then who cares. And yes it did piss me off to read that.
Do we have a change of heart?Originally posted by -BB-
Exactly!!
Now I believe that Sadam was a VERY bad guy, and that less people (civilians) probably died in this war, than Sadam kills in hte average year...
I believe that a US invasion was probably the only way that sadam could be eliminated...
I am FOR our troops, For the removal of Sadam, For the war... But I am also FOR the right of these people to protest, even if it inconveniences some people... I am also for the arrest of these protestors when they chain themselves and block traffic.
I am NOT for the police using violence against protestors in an indescriminant way. You want to get them away? Fire Tear-gas, and they will RUN. Fire some shots in the air!!
DO NOT shoot people in the back with a wooden bullet as they are trying to run away.
Not at all...Originally posted by Brian HCM#1
Do we have a change of heart?