Is it a coincidence that such a high priced item has a logo that is almost identical to Bugatti's?https://www.pinkbike.com/news/absoluteblack-claim-to-have-created-the-worlds-fastest-and-most-durable-chain-lube.html
$150 for a bottle of lube. Unless it comes with some higly renowned female porn star attached to it, I'd call it BS.
Those guys are full of bullshit. I get blasted all day with adds about how their chainrings will make me faster, scientifically proven, etc. So I ask them what scientific proof they have that their results are valid, they say "well it provides 'up to' this and that % improvement in this and that". I say that "up to" is a red flag, what are the significance of the results, what quantitative methods have been used to determine their validity? They send me to their website which basically just says the same exact thing. No validation of the results. Nothing to indicate that their "up to" numbers are more than outliers or noise. Their claims are grandiose. If you got a 7% increase, you'd obviously smash every TDF course record ever. They are actually claiming some kind of turbo-charging effect, that you don't lose performance with altitude with these things...lol.https://www.pinkbike.com/news/absoluteblack-claim-to-have-created-the-worlds-fastest-and-most-durable-chain-lube.html
$150 for a bottle of lube. Unless it comes with some higly renowned female porn star attached to it, I'd call it BS.
well the half ounce bottle is $15.https://www.pinkbike.com/news/absoluteblack-claim-to-have-created-the-worlds-fastest-and-most-durable-chain-lube.html
$150 for a bottle of lube. Unless it comes with some higly renowned female porn star attached to it, I'd call it BS.
absolute black is more of a reference to the amount of darkness which exists in the pit where they get these "claims".Those guys are full of bullshit. I get blasted all day with adds about how their chainrings will make me faster, scientifically proven, etc. So I ask them what scientific proof they have that their results are valid, they say "well it provides 'up to' this and that % improvement in this and that". I say that "up to" is a red flag, what are the significance of the results, what quantitative methods have been used to determine their validity? They send me to their website which basically just says the same exact thing. No validation of the results. Their claims are grandiose. If you got a 7% increase, you'd obviously smash every TDF course record ever. They are actually claiming some kind of turbo-charging effect, that you don't lose performance with altitude with these things...lol.
also, some of the phrasing they're using is in a training module i'm required to take every few years. it's an example of phrasing to NOT use because it's ambiguous. my industry has very strict requirements on what kind of information can be used in marketing literature.Those guys are full of bullshit. I get blasted all day with adds about how their chainrings will make me faster, scientifically proven, etc. So I ask them what scientific proof they have that their results are valid, they say "well it provides 'up to' this and that % improvement in this and that". I say that "up to" is a red flag, what are the significance of the results, what quantitative methods have been used to determine their validity? They send me to their website which basically just says the same exact thing. No validation of the results. Nothing to indicate that their "up to" numbers are more than outliers or noise. Their claims are grandiose. If you got a 7% increase, you'd obviously smash every TDF course record ever. They are actually claiming some kind of turbo-charging effect, that you don't lose performance with altitude with these things...lol.
He's kind of the road-bike-bottom-bracket version of Craig talking about RS and Fox suspension...Is it a coincidence that such a high priced item has a logo that is almost identical to Bugatti's?
I used to work in pharma, same deal. Bit different than the bike industry.my industry has very strict requirements on what kind of information can be used in marketing literature.
teensy bit.I used to work in pharma, same deal. Bit different than the bike industry.
I have to deal with pharma marketing now. I've worked with some other industries that involve regulated marketing, but pharma by far takes the cake.I used to work in pharma, same deal. Bit different than the bike industry.
Oh yea. Teams of attorneys that review marketing materials long before sales reps even see them and start training on them. Then they spend weeks drilling it into your head military-style to make sure you say exactly what you're supposed to. Legit.I have to deal with pharma marketing now. I've worked with some other industries that involve regulated marketing, but pharma by far takes the cake.
I remember when I was first shopping for oval chainrings, like in 2015 or something. At the time the only two options were Absolute bLack (of substance), and Wolftooth. The sheer level of marketeering wankery spewed by AbsLack even back then was astonishing. Wolftooth in contrast was just like: here's some oval chainrings, what size do you want? I think both companies were roughly the same size back then.Those guys are full of bullshit. I get blasted all day with adds about how their chainrings will make me faster, scientifically proven, etc. So I ask them what scientific proof they have that their results are valid, they say "well it provides 'up to' this and that % improvement in this and that". I say that "up to" is a red flag, what are the significance of the results, what quantitative methods have been used to determine their validity? They send me to their website which basically just says the same exact thing. No validation of the results. Nothing to indicate that their "up to" numbers are more than outliers or noise. Their claims are grandiose. If you got a 7% increase, you'd obviously smash every TDF course record ever. They are actually claiming some kind of turbo-charging effect, that you don't lose performance with altitude with these things...lol.
And yet, when you buy a bike, you can research their price and get what works for you the best.Oh yea. Teams of attorneys that review marketing materials long before sales reps even see them and start training on them. Then they spend weeks drilling it into your head military-style to make sure you say exactly what you're supposed to. Legit.
Then on the other hand we have bike industry marketing (which, ironically now is part of my profession) and it's like a free-for-all. Companies can say whatever they want because people just believe it. Dumbfounding.
Because when consumers are allowed a voice on that subject the first ones that speak up want essential oils instead of vaccinesNot exactly the same experience when you need medical care...
Some of us sweat.fuck gloves unless it's below 40 freedoms
Some of us sweat.
oh, i sweat...i live somewhere sweatier than you. and utility...meh.And value the utility of our hands.
Maybe that's why your bike crackedoh, i sweat...i live somewhere sweatier than you. and utility...meh.
I agree but would like to add that gloves are cool in the rain too.fuck gloves unless it's below 40 freedoms
I actually reckon its the cooler days here where you can run no gloves, not the other way around. It gets bloody hot and sweaty even in winter here.fuck gloves unless it's below 40 freedoms
Maybe quit buying girly gloves more suited to roadys.... buy some motorcycle glovesAre all modern gloves basically throwaways after one ride? I've just bought and returned gloves from Dakine and TLD that both came apart at the stitching within a few rides (one ride for the TLDs). I get that modern, thinner gloves are gonna be less durable in a crash, but these things came unstitched without a crash. And its not like they're cheap these days. My old TLD Airs are going strong after ages, but the new version sucks. Trying some Fasthouse ones now.
That's been my recent experience. I used to wear Fox, but local LBSs started stocking only roadie gloves. I have had some luck buying moto gloves instead.Are all modern gloves basically throwaways after one ride? I've just bought and returned gloves from Dakine and TLD that both came apart at the stitching within a few rides (one ride for the TLDs). I get that modern, thinner gloves are gonna be less durable in a crash, but these things came unstitched without a crash. And its not like they're cheap these days. My old TLD Airs are going strong after ages, but the new version sucks. Trying some Fasthouse ones now.
Check out Handup gloves. Granted I have only one pair, but they seem decent.
HANDUP | Mountain Bike Gloves, Golf Gloves & Ski Gloves
Home of the original bold, Minimalist Mountain bike gloves, Golf Gloves, Skiing Gloves, and Snowboarding Gloves with affordable Outdoor Apparel to match!handupgloves.com
I still use some older fox gloves that I have stockpiled from when I worked there. They do seem better than a lot of newer paper thin gloves.
The fucking AB adds are getting out of hand. They were ridiculous before, but jesus.https://www.pinkbike.com/news/absoluteblack-claim-to-have-created-the-worlds-fastest-and-most-durable-chain-lube.html
$150 for a bottle of lube. Unless it comes with some higly renowned female porn star attached to it, I'd call it BS.
I went back to glass and using my pedals. Then I put on a glove to insulate the bottle.Also, are you guys opening cans of beer while wearing your gloves?
This is critical info, as the tab on the can will for sure deteriorate the glove a lot faster. Moar beer, moar wear.
Bottles are fine for end of the ride, but for out on the trail I think cans are the safer option.I went back to glass and using my pedals. Then I put on a glove to insulate the bottle.
BRB pitching an on-trail beer transportation systems roundup.Bottles are fine for end of the ride, but for out on the trail I think cans are the safer option.
Why hasn't this been the subject of a website test yet?
You need a brewery to be the sponsor of this test?BRB pitching an on-trail beer transportation systems roundup.
We've got:
Criteria:
- 12oz bottles
- large format bottles
- 12oz cans
- 16oz cans
- larger crowler style cans
- trailer with a keg in it
- Breakability
- Weight per volume of beer
- Safety
- Ease of transport
- Availability of beer options
- Insulation
Am I missing anything?