Nostalgia can be quite expensive. "No rips or tears" and the whole back of the saddle is just about to give up. I'm hoping he meant 30$ not 300$.Wtf is up with the price of seats?
Nostalgia can be quite expensive. "No rips or tears" and the whole back of the saddle is just about to give up. I'm hoping he meant 30$ not 300$.Wtf is up with the price of seats?
I mean those too, but just in general.Nostalgia can be quite expensive. "No rips or tears" and the whole back of the saddle is just about to give up. I'm hoping he meant 30$ not 300$.
Oh man 10 out of 10 (I don't say 100%, cuz it's tackyThe fallacy lies in the assumption an AI is somehow better than humans at picking stuff, when in reality it's heavily dependent on the data it was fed on (usually, too little because preselection takes time and model refining means moar money), the selection criteria (and therefore, the bias) built in by whoever designed it, and finally on the constraints it's presented with.
Because let's be honest, this is far from being intelligent design (even by catholic standards). It's just a poor algorithm trying to find something that pleases its creators to keep their attention.
I was confused for a bit as well. He pulled the sidewall of the tire medically just a bit. Then right by the bead there’s a small bit of black rim visible.i can't what's going on in that picture so....
I will give cred to JK for the Anchorman reference. LMAOi can't what's going on in that picture so....
Will go great with enduro onesies
I feel like they're about 5 years too late, missing the whole goggles with a half shell fad.
I think what you were really thinking was from Team America. Jebus Titty Fucking Chriii....
Genuinely i want to fight someone.
sounds like 15 minutes too muchWorldwide cyclery doing an interview with Srams ceo. Yawn.
-What part of your job do you like best?
-I like it all!
-What do you prefer, road or mountain?
-That's like asking me which of my son's I like better!
15 minutes of pain was enough.
While these look ridiculous and I'm not buying a pair, the concept makes sense to me (I think).
I hate the look, but certainly not the idea. Having ridden with contacts for years, my eyes were (and are, post-Lasik) always super sensitive to any dust, debris, or wind. Sunglasses block 90% of that but I can't say I'm opposed to stopping the extra 10%.While these look ridiculous and I'm not buying a pair, the concept makes sense to me (I think).
I like wearing glasses while riding for eye protection, but it generally takes about 10 minutes during the summer before they're dripping with sweat and I can't see where I'm going. Goggles don't usually have that issue, so if they've managed to make goggles that are more tolerable to wear trail riding it seems like there's some merit there.
I'm just starting it right now. We'll see if he makes me want to buy SRAM parts or continue my irrational boycott.sounds like 15 minutes too much
I imagine for people who wear contacts or something those would be good? I'd rather wear normal goggles with an open face if the conditions merited it.I imagine I'll never see those gloggles in real life. When the Rockbros version comes out for $25 on Amazon, I'll take a look.
I skimmed the article and never saw a description of the goggles' features that make them different from normal. It talked about more air flow but didn't show or describe the vents. All my goggles have as much venting as possible while still covering the vents with foam.I imagine for people who wear contacts or something those would be good? I'd rather wear normal goggles with an open face if the conditions merited it.
I also had Lasik, and for the same reason can't understand why you'd want to wear these instead of proper goggles. I even got the Smith Rhythm ones with a fine screen on top/bottom to help keep out the odd bits of grit that fly up. Even with high coverage glasses (Smith Wildcats, Oakley Flight Jackets), I still get something that sneaks around the lens every handful of rides. Worst was when an actual fly got sucked and hit my eyeball. If I'm wearing a FF (which is most of the time), I'd rather have goggles to help hold the helmet still.I hate the look, but certainly not the idea. Having ridden with contacts for years, my eyes were (and are, post-Lasik) always super sensitive to any dust, debris, or wind. Sunglasses block 90% of that but I can't say I'm opposed to stopping the extra 10%.
Add dust to the list for those of us in dry climates. So much dust...The biggest issue with goggles IME is fogging. The biggest reason you use them is watering with mud being a pretty close secondary. The issue with fogging though is this isn't like motorsports or even skiing, our exertion screws the entire thing up, skiing you are going downhill all the time, as you work harder on mtb, in cooler places, you start getting fog. Unless this somehow magically stops fog, which every single thing that makes that claim doesn't deliver on, I don't see the point.
Plus, these make fuck-all allowance for people that have to wear glasses.