This weeks edition of "It's not about race".
- Thread starter Pesqueeb
- Start date
Yet again "pro-lifers" enthusiastically endorse actual murder
like the kennedys never had a lawn jockey in their yard...
and you know as well as i do that white people have no business trying to do reggae...
unless it's dread zeppelin.
and it sounds like sonny needs to have a gun cleaning accident.
Last edited:
I think I've said this before, but I think Cornel West might be Silver.
he's a self loathing canadian who happens to be white... just like the rest of us....
Last edited:
So he claims on the internet.
Last edited:
With such strong support from the right on the Zimmerman verdict this must mean women in Texas can use the castle doctrine since pregnancy potentially carries serious risk and they may stand their ground if they feel threatened by their reproductive system.
This also means children can beat or kill each other with no consequences if they feel threatened on the playground. Principals can't deny their legal rights.
This also means children can beat or kill each other with no consequences if they feel threatened on the playground. Principals can't deny their legal rights.
Last edited:
or johne might let a guy beat his brains out on the pavement but will shoot a dog if feeling threatened?
You funny Steve...still sore about the Phlyers losing the Cup to my Hawks? 
The real tragedy here is that two lives have been destroyed...I wonder if all the people protesting would feel the same way if the races were reversed or different. This is not about gun control, race relations or how stupid Floridians are. This is about one man and his actions one fateful night and the aftermath of said actions. I bet if he could do it again, Zimmerman would have followed the dispatchers advice and stayed in his car.
It is over and done with...what have we learned as a society?
The real tragedy here is that two lives have been destroyed...I wonder if all the people protesting would feel the same way if the races were reversed or different. This is not about gun control, race relations or how stupid Floridians are. This is about one man and his actions one fateful night and the aftermath of said actions. I bet if he could do it again, Zimmerman would have followed the dispatchers advice and stayed in his car.
It is over and done with...what have we learned as a society?
that our media 'system' sucks balls.
We already knew Florida was stupid - vigilantism is illegal for good reason. Castle doctrine at best should only apply to your own property.
more from those fun loving gun toting Floridians
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/man-shoots-teen-loud-music-article-1.1209345
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/man-shoots-teen-loud-music-article-1.1209345
we have...ahem...another goalie.You funny Steve...still sore about the Phlyers losing the Cup to my Hawks?
and i only ever kid....smilie or no smilie.
sh|t just got realYou funny Steve...still sore about the Phlyers losing the Cup to my Hawks?
Real cliched?
Last edited:
Nods head in agreement...
Even then, you want my tv? Take the fvcking thing.
Come near my family and you will have a whole new problem set. But to take a life over a material object? Just cant see it. I will go get a newer, cooler model, install new locks and get a bigger dog.
Now touch my bikes, thats another story...
that justice for a dead black man is only a concern when race is a factor....
i think more people of color have died from gun violence in chicago this year.
Last edited:
I think more people of color have died from gun violence in various parts of Africa this year, that still doesn't make crime in FL (or elsewhere) acceptable. You have no argument if that is your rebuttal.
As JBP noted yesterday, take a look at this cracker: http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/trayvon-martin-and-the-irony-of-american-justice/277782/
Last edited:
Hmmmm...
"In deciding whether Trayvon Martin was justified in the use of deadly force, you must judge him by the circumstances by which he was surrounded at the time the force was used. The danger facing Trayvon Martin need not have been actual; however, to justify the use of deadly force, the appearance of danger must have been so real that a reasonably cautious and prudent person under the same circumstances would have believed that the danger could be avoided only through the use of that force. Based upon appearances, Trayvon Martin must have actually believed that the danger was real.
If Trayvon Martin was not engaged in an unlawful activity and was attacked in any place where he had a right to be, he had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand his ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he reasonably believed that it was necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony."
What if?
"In deciding whether Trayvon Martin was justified in the use of deadly force, you must judge him by the circumstances by which he was surrounded at the time the force was used. The danger facing Trayvon Martin need not have been actual; however, to justify the use of deadly force, the appearance of danger must have been so real that a reasonably cautious and prudent person under the same circumstances would have believed that the danger could be avoided only through the use of that force. Based upon appearances, Trayvon Martin must have actually believed that the danger was real.
If Trayvon Martin was not engaged in an unlawful activity and was attacked in any place where he had a right to be, he had no duty to retreat and had the right to stand his ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he reasonably believed that it was necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony."
What if?
Last edited:
This society will never be able to move forward when so many of us spend so much time looking back.
also, #florida: http://www.npr.org/2013/07/16/202566705/zimmerman-case-prompts-massive-responses-to-race-card-project
Last edited:
Apparently, if you're going to witness you're friend getting shot, you should sound as educated and white as possible.
http://gawker.com/juror-b37-george-zimmermans-heart-was-in-the-right-p-796086979
http://gawker.com/juror-b37-george-zimmermans-heart-was-in-the-right-p-796086979
mistrial!
so... he was playing vigilante?
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/piers-morgan-conducts-riveting-interview-with-trayvon-martins-friend-witness-rachel-jeantel/
time to update urban dictionary?
What if......
etymology yo
'what if' what? what if the media constantly showed a pic of a happy little white kid taken yrs before his death as compared to a seemingly angry black guy in a prison jumpsuit?
they'd *still* be guilty of whipping up race hatred
new law: all conflicts settled by pistols at dawn
fired sideways from the weaver stance
well, then the shooting would be no more accurate than during the days of yore when pistol accuracy was poor and this kind of conflict resolution was en vogue
Serious question - If Trayvon had been a blue-eyed blond-haired white kid and Zimmerman had been a black guy, do you honestly think that the situation (the initial confrontation, as well as the resulting trial) would have played out *exactly* as it did?
My gut feeling is "no", but that might be why I'm upset over the verdict.